• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Hansen

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
259 Posts 60 Posters 9.4k Views
Hansen
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    replied to SynicBast on last edited by
    #103

    @SynicBast said in Hansen:

    @shark said in Hansen:

    Oh and by the way, this post 2015 team just isn't a patch on the previous side stacked with all-time greats. No-one could have done any better with the cattle available. Losing convincingly to a very good England side shouldn't be a major surprise to anyone given the patchy form shown throughout the 2016-19 era and the lesser standard of players available in general.

    Given that we lost the best ever centre pairing, the GOAT, and two other all time greats after 2015, the level of expectation in terms of dominance was unfounded. I think it is time for a complete change now in AB management, but I will always rate Hansen - He's still one of the classiest people around in the way he thinks about the good of the game at a world level and also the way he has represented the ABs during some very major disruptive events.

    Very well said.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #104

    @Bones said in Hansen:

    @shark think we'll be fine at 8 with Savea being backed up by the various young guns shining through in super rugby.

    So our best openside flanker and essentially the incumbent 6 now needs to switch to 8? No thanks.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #105

    @Bones said in Hansen:

    @shark said in Hansen:

    @Bones said in Hansen:

    @shark @sparky

    Laughable. What exactly would they have offered? Franks can usually hold up a scrum on his teams ball...whoop de do. That's about it, he's a spent force at test level.

    What exactly did Laulala, Ofa and Angus offer today? Penalties and at-best stable scrum ball.

    Hah you've just perfectly described Franks' last half a dozen tests.

    Edit: at least with the others there's a chance they might do something more.

    But they didn't. At all. Franks adds experience and mana.

    broughieB SnowyS 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    junior
    wrote on last edited by
    #106

    This thread has given me some serious PTSD and I’m having flashbacks to 2003!

    But seriously, and putting aside the hyperbole (eg Hansen = Satan / Hansen = Jesus), I will look very favourably upon the Hansen era and I do think he has taken the All Blacks to another level, enhanced the legacy and all that other jazz. Simply put, the rugby we played between 2012 to Chicago 2016 was revolutionary and we may never see any team play with such skill consistently ever again. Yes, he’s had the cattle to do it, but his time steering the ship made much better use of the cattle, IMO, than anyone before him (I still think Henry didn’t get as much out of his team as he should have).

    That being said, I think Hansen held on too long - he should have gone after the Lions as planned. Since we won in 2015, we’ve obviously had a lot of bad milestones - losses to Ireland, drawn Lions series etc - but we’ve also seen a drop off in skill levels, consistency, muddled selections, poor game plans, lack of calm under pressure and - more worrying than anything - a resignation or “c’est la vie” attitude in defeat. To me, it just looked like Shag had lost that absolute hunger to win and it seems to have rubbed off on his players.

    Similarly, I’d argue he’s become a bit bored and overconfident with all the easy wins and has fallen into the habit of tinkering unnecessarily.

    Every team at this Cup has a very clear style of how they play. Except for last week, we on the other hand have looked confused and unclear about which plan or style we are playing with in any given match.

    I know this isn’t the match thread, but I’d like to make a couple of observations about the match today, which are demonstrative of the issues since 2016 that can be firmly directed at the coaching:

    1. We looked completely surprised that England started so well and made life very difficult for us - this was evident in the poor decision making and option taking from the start to the end of the match.
    2. We played with a game plan last week that would have beaten any team in the world if executed well. Yet, we shelved it completely today and went with the side to side shit from the opening whistle, together with stupid options like putting up bombs in their 22. The only time we put together some pods and ran at their forwards, Reece had acres of space, ran into the corner and we scored an easy try from the ensuing lineout. In short, we played into their hands, throughout that match.
    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    17
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    junior
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #107

    @sparky said in Hansen:

    We got smashed up front today.

    Leaving Owen Franks and Karl T out of the 31 look to have been massive mistakes.

    Did we? I mean we didn’t even really take them on there, really challenge their fatties in the way we did last week. As I said above, the game plan (whatever it was) was absolutely fucked today. We belted the shit out of the Irish forwards last week and they’ve been the worlds best for 3 out of the last 4 years. Why the reluctance to try and do the same to the Poms? We totally could have made them work so much harder than they had to today, but instead tried to go around them without ever sucking in any of their defensive players.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • BerniesCornerB Offline
    BerniesCornerB Offline
    BerniesCorner
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #108

    @sparky I very much doubt anyone in NZ rugby would have made much difference today, that England forward pack was in a different league. It feels like an ambush, keeping their powder dry

    sparkyS 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #109

    @shark said in Hansen:

    @Bones said in Hansen:

    @shark think we'll be fine at 8 with Savea being backed up by the various young guns shining through in super rugby.

    So our best openside flanker and essentially the incumbent 6 now needs to switch to 8? No thanks.

    Yeah true not like Savea gets much time at 8, I mean the ABs only shifted our best 8 in the last decade so Savea could run off the scrum. Cane is our best 7.

    Experience and mana doesn't count for much when you can't keep up with play so just give away penalties instead.

    sharkS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #110

    @Bones so you'd have Savea play 6 and 8? Because we have issues at both spots. I'd play him at 7 with Cane off the bench. He's serviceable at 6 and 8 but not a long term answer in either position.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to junior on last edited by
    #111

    @junior yeah it was so weird and so frustrating. Like they were deliberately ignoring the space they were making in order to set something up later. That was the only way I could figure for why they were cutting back in, deliberately running down the sideline with no out. But no, guess they just were bottling it.

    WingerW 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #112

    @shark said in Hansen:

    @Bones so you'd have Savea play 6 and 8? Because we have issues at both spots. I'd play him at 7 with Cane off the bench. He's serviceable at 6 and 8 but not a long term answer in either position.

    I'd go with big bopper 6, probably Frizell. Ardie and Cane.

    Start to develop someone like Benn-Nicholas. Etc.

    BartManB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to BerniesCorner on last edited by
    #113

    @BerniesCorner said in Hansen:

    @sparky I very much doubt anyone in NZ rugby would have made much difference today, that England forward pack was in a different league. It feels like an ambush, keeping their powder dry

    I think that Richie McCaw at the top of his game would have made a difference. We would have been more competitive at the breakdown. We wouldn't have given away 18 turnovers. He would have rallied and focused his troops in the last 15 minutes.

    Never saw the pack overrun as it was last night when the GOAT was on the park.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Jailbreak7J Offline
    Jailbreak7J Offline
    Jailbreak7
    wrote on last edited by
    #114

    Well mostly been said above. Absolutely gutted.
    Can only hope for a cleanout and a better showing in 2020.
    The sun will still rise tomorrow.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • broughieB Offline
    broughieB Offline
    broughie
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #115

    @Bones As long as that interim does not turn in permanently fair enough.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to broughie on last edited by
    #116

    @broughie said in Hansen:

    @Bones As long as that interim does not turn in permanently fair enough.

    Nah, that's just a heck of a lot of top level coaching nous that can be passed on over a year or two.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • broughieB Offline
    broughieB Offline
    broughie
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #117

    @shark Franks was done. He was a liability and wouldn’t have helped at all yesterday. Probably should have been culled over a year ago instead we just realized we wanted bigger more mobile props about 6 months ago.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #118

    @shark

    Bridge was poor. Its a bit pointless arguing who was more poor. And really Bridge and Reece only made the starting team because of who they play for

    Coaches naturally have preferences for the team they support. But a good coach has the maturity to put his preferences to one side and pick the best team. They must do this and also make it seem as they doing this otherwise its likely to create a strange atmosphere in the team. When Hansen picked Barrett over Cane it was obvious what was going on. Then what followed was a dreadful performance

    Hansen failed the maturity test. As Wylie, Hart and Deans did before him. Henry and Smith didn't.

    The next coach can't be Robertson. He's not ready yet. Go overseas and coach for a few years to prove he can coach outside the safe Crusaders environment. I just like the look of Joseph and Brown. Greta combination and Joseph is a perfect front person

    sharkS D 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    wrote on last edited by
    #119

    Wow, what a dirty asterisk next to one of the greatest coaching reigns ever.

    There'll be " monkey brain" condemnation and slagging for sure, but Shag has been an outstanding coach in many different ways and has been extremely valuable to NZ rugby.

    Poor ol fozzie sees his whole career path get bulldozed in the space of 80 minutes.

    New broom and let's go

    broughieB WingerW 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    wrote on last edited by
    #120

    Used to be a huge fan of Hansen but the non selection of Cane, dropping BFA for a flaky asf Jordie and the decision to pick weak reserve scrummaging props have seriously made him look like an amateur. Unfortunately he will be remembered for this and in hindsight should have bowed out at the end of 2017 as originally planned.

    Billy TellB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    replied to akan004 on last edited by
    #121

    @akan004 said in Hansen:

    Used to be a huge fan of Hansen but the non selection of Cane, dropping BFA for a flaky asf Jordie and the decision to pick weak reserve scrummaging props have seriously made him look like an amateur. Unfortunately he will be remembered for this and in hindsight should have bowed out at the end of 2017 as originally planned.

    To be replaced by who though?? Like who was actually available and proven in 2017?? All the good coaches were contracted elsewhere, you’d have basically been left with foster.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • broughieB Offline
    broughieB Offline
    broughie
    replied to Siam on last edited by
    #122

    @Siam Agree except I don’t feel sorry for Fozzie because as a head coach he did nothing and should not be in the run for the AB job.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3

Hansen
Sports Talk
allblacks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.