• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks v France Test #2

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksfrance
830 Posts 75 Posters 74.1k Views
All Blacks v France Test #2
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by Nepia
    #632

    @taniwharugby Hansen basically echoed all my thoughts - including my scenario of the same team players taking out each other and the fact that the outcome shouldn't determine the sanction of the action.

    Since we're so in sync (Tongan Frizell aside) he might take my selectorial advice for next weekend.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by ACT Crusader
    #633

    From my armchair view Cane looked spent early in the test. Not sure what the deal is, but he looked noticeably off the pace.

    Squire was pretty good last week and put in the grunt work, but we are going to have to live with some inconsistency given the lack of experience. Look at the loosies in previous years that had up and down form - Vito, Thomson, Luatua, Messam (before he became a starter)

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #634

    @booboo said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

    @pakman said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

    Forgive me for intimating we might take a leaf out of AFL books, but surely those crazies have a rule to reduce the carnage which might otherwise result from their marking antics?

    Like thou shalt not tackle below the waist?

    2017 Laws of the Game - Protection of the Ball Player

    2017 Laws of the Game - Protection of the Ball Player
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #635

    Now rewatched first half, where ABs weren't too bad. Four takeaways:

    1. In early play ABs were leaving a big gap about two out from rucks. French really excellent at exploiting that. One try that ought to have been scored and another dangerous break by Bellau;

    2. Moody/Barrett (S) combo seemed off. It seemed that in second and third scrums power from Barrett not coming through well. After missed try the LH hit was poor and scrum struggling from there. Next scrum Moody won the hit, but power seemed to stutter and his knee went to ground, after which French scrum mullered us;

    3. DMac was hopeless when we got scrums close to French line. Instead of manipulating things to exploit extra man he tried to do too much. But in broken play his ability to find space is superb;

    4. French made maybe four turnovers, at least three close to flanks. Abs guilty of mot having support players clean out after e.g. Taylor went to ground. Sloppy.

    NepiaN Chester DrawsC P 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #636

    @pakman Moody is worrying. What has happened to his form? In general play he's nearly as bad as Franks.

    TBH, it's worrying how bad Franks has got in general play, he's never been great but now he's terrible, he's just there for scrummaging now.

    It will be interesting to see how much our pack transforms when BBBR is back though.

    ACT CrusaderA Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #637

    @nepia if it's anything like he's been playing for the Chiefs this year then I don't think Retallick will add too much. His form has been well below his best and he's caught the penalty bug too.

    NepiaN Billy TellB ShadowTrooperS 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #638

    @act-crusader said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

    @nepia if it's anything like he's been playing for the Chiefs this year then I don't think Retallick will add too much. His form has been well below his best and he's caught the penalty bug too.

    Seriously, WTF have you been smoking in the ACT or Canterbury this year? He's singlehandedly kept the Chiefs in games and without him (and Cane) they wouldn't be in spitting distance of making the finals.

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #639

    @act-crusader said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

    @nepia if it's anything like he's been playing for the Chiefs this year then I don't think Retallick will add too much. His form has been well below his best and he's caught the penalty bug too.

    I can only conclude you know absolutely nothing about rugby.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester Draws
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #640

    @pakman

    There was very little to be gained by the ABs practicing against a short backline.

    We gained more by pretending there wasn't an overlap and playing our normal game. So DMac wasn't necessarily wrong to do what he would normally do.

    We need to work out how to beat rush defences, not how to trash sides short a man.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #641

    @pakman said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

    Now rewatched first half, where ABs weren't too bad. Four takeaways:

    1. In early play ABs were leaving a big gap about two out from rucks. French really excellent at exploiting that. One try that ought to have been scored and another dangerous break by Bellau;

    2. Moody/Barrett (S) combo seemed off. It seemed that in second and third scrums power from Barrett not coming through well. After missed try the LH hit was poor and scrum struggling from there. Next scrum Moody won the hit, but power seemed to stutter and his knee went to ground, after which French scrum mullered us;

    3. DMac was hopeless when we got scrums close to French line. Instead of manipulating things to exploit extra man he tried to do too much. But in broken play his ability to find space is superb;

    4. French made maybe four turnovers, at least three close to flanks. Abs guilty of mot having support players clean out after e.g. Taylor went to ground. Sloppy.

    Now watched second. Third quarter OK, but fourth abysmal. On the above:

    1. Some gaps still close to ruck, and which French worked by passing back close in; and

    2. Moody's knee on ground again at first scrum and replaced. Hard to judge Karl T, as French props swapped out after his first scrum. But replacement AB front row right on top of replacement French one.

    Thought ALB was very collected and played well. I'd have subbed Crotty instead of him.

    I thought Ardie was quite good.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ShadowTrooperS Offline
    ShadowTrooperS Offline
    ShadowTrooper
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #642

    @act-crusader Seriosly bro, BBBR has been consistently the Chiefs best on the paddock, and as said above has kept us in games where without him we would have lost by a country mile. I imagine he will do the same for the ABs i.e. shore up the loose defence around the ruck, empower the scrum, give us another option in the LOs and generally tackle anything that moves.

    MiketheSnowM W 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to ShadowTrooper on last edited by
    #643

    @shadowtrooper said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

    @act-crusader Seriosly bro, BBBR has been consistently the Chiefs best on the paddock, and as said above has kept us in games where without him we would have lost by a country mile. I imagine he will do the same for the ABs i.e. shore up the loose defence around the ruck, empower the scrum, give us another option in the LOs and generally tackle anything that moves.

    Which is great and most probably accurate.

    But without him, the ABs are emminently beatable.

    A very precarious situation non?

    ShadowTrooperS nzzpN 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • ShadowTrooperS Offline
    ShadowTrooperS Offline
    ShadowTrooper
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #644

    @mikethesnow From time to time all teams get beaten - yes even Wales and the ABs.
    However, it's more about getting our collective shit together and improving the focus for this week.

    MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #645

    @mikethesnow said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

    @shadowtrooper said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

    @act-crusader Seriosly bro, BBBR has been consistently the Chiefs best on the paddock, and as said above has kept us in games where without him we would have lost by a country mile. I imagine he will do the same for the ABs i.e. shore up the loose defence around the ruck, empower the scrum, give us another option in the LOs and generally tackle anything that moves.

    Which is great and most probably accurate.

    But without him, the ABs are emminently beatable.

    A very precarious situation non?

    Well, yes. We're at it lowest ebb for some time having lost six hundred cap players after the last world cup, and still having some injury issues combined with losing reasonably got players up north.

    So, yeah he's important to us. But give us another year or so and see who gets thrown up by the talent pyramid. We've just gone from very very hard to beat, to hard to beat. Given the current crop, I'll take that.

    BonesB MiketheSnowM 2 Replies Last reply
    4
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #646

    @nzzp said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

    @mikethesnow said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

    @shadowtrooper said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

    @act-crusader Seriosly bro, BBBR has been consistently the Chiefs best on the paddock, and as said above has kept us in games where without him we would have lost by a country mile. I imagine he will do the same for the ABs i.e. shore up the loose defence around the ruck, empower the scrum, give us another option in the LOs and generally tackle anything that moves.

    Which is great and most probably accurate.

    But without him, the ABs are emminently beatable.

    A very precarious situation non?

    Well, yes. We're at it lowest ebb for some time having lost six hundred cap players after the last world cup, and still having some injury issues combined with losing reasonably got players up North.

    So, yeah he's important to us. But give us another year or so and see who gets thrown up by the talent pyramid. We've just gone from very very hard to beat, to hard to beat. Given the current crop, I'll take that.

    I thinking making the N uppercase gives this a whole different meaning when talking to a Welshman.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to ShadowTrooper on last edited by
    #647

    @shadowtrooper said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

    @mikethesnow From time to time all teams get beaten - yes even Wales and the ABs.
    However, it's more about getting our collective shit together and improving the focus for this week.

    Too kind mentioning Wales in the same sentence as NZ. We're some way off that.

    Just surprised that Shag & Co haven't got plan B, C, D, E, F and G for BBBR as they appear to have for other positions

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #648

    @mikethesnow said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

    @shadowtrooper said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

    @mikethesnow From time to time all teams get beaten - yes even Wales and the ABs.
    However, it's more about getting our collective shit together and improving the focus for this week.

    Too kind mentioning Wales in the same sentence as NZ. We're some way off that.

    Just surprised that Shag & Co haven't got plan B, C, D, E, F and G for BBBR as they appear to have for other positions

    My plan is to pray for another generational talent to appear from nowhere.

    I have had beers, but so far it appears a good plan.

    1 Reply Last reply
    9
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #649

    @nzzp said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

    But give us another year or so and see who gets thrown up by the talent pyramid. We've just gone from very very hard to beat, to hard to beat. Given the current crop, I'll take that.

    Like that (in bold) and will take it along a step

    The NZ Talent Volcano
    The brighest and hardest explode on to the scene and leave a lasting legacy

    Had a few Gin & Sodas myself

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • W Offline
    W Offline
    Wreck Diver
    replied to ShadowTrooper on last edited by
    #650

    @shadowtrooper you forgot strong ball carrier that makes it over the advantage line.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    replied to broughie on last edited by
    #651

    @broughie said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

    @hooroo Ok. I guess it is over. Time to go to bed.

    I have missed something here but I don't get the context of this post?

    broughieB 1 Reply Last reply
    0

All Blacks v France Test #2
Rugby Matches
allblacksfrance
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.