• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusaderschiefs
256 Posts 51 Posters 9.4k Views
SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    replied to Hooroo on last edited by
    #199

    @hooroo Nah, I think the Reds and the Brumbies will be very competitive.

    H 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to Hooroo on last edited by
    #200

    @hooroo said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @kiwimurph so hopefully it is done away with.

    Problem is in last 5 then Barrett has nothing yo lose using it

    Why? If the referee gives a shit penalty, why shouldn't it be challenged? Barrett had a go, as he is entitled to but the referees made the right decision.

    Because that’s the game we have loved for decades. Sometimes you get a shitter of a decision but that’s rugby.

    These referrals fucking suck. That chiefs one earlier was fucking dross. Kind of embarrassing

    You mean the one where the referees missed a penalty? We don't except a wrong decision made leading up to a try, so why would we accept a wrong penalty decision deciding a game?

    HoorooH ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to akan004 on last edited by
    #201

    @akan004 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @hooroo Nah, I think the Reds and the Brumbies will be very competitive.

    I think so. Especially over there. The other teams should get done though.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    wrote on last edited by
    #202

    Just realised the Crusaders jerseys say Cockram on them 😂

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Mattasaurus on last edited by
    #203

    @mattasaurus said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @bones yeah those blues did real well last night.

    Clearly second best team in the comp

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #204

    @anonymous said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    Just realised the Crusaders jerseys say Cockram on them 😂

    No fucken way! With that logo too? You couldn't write this stuff....

    Oh grow up.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #205

    @bones But then I might cut myself shaving!

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #206

    @anonymous said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @bones But then I might cut myself shaving!

    You're welcome.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • YeetyaahY Online
    YeetyaahY Online
    Yeetyaah
    wrote on last edited by
    #207

    Never in doubt. Up the fucking Chiefs.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #208

    @hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @hooroo said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @kiwimurph so hopefully it is done away with.

    Problem is in last 5 then Barrett has nothing yo lose using it

    Why? If the referee gives a shit penalty, why shouldn't it be challenged? Barrett had a go, as he is entitled to but the referees made the right decision.

    Because that’s the game we have loved for decades. Sometimes you get a shitter of a decision but that’s rugby.

    These referrals fucking suck. That chiefs one earlier was fucking dross. Kind of embarrassing

    You mean the one where the referees missed a penalty? We don't except a wrong decision made leading up to a try, so why would we accept a wrong penalty decision deciding a game?

    Because that’s rugby.

    Glad to hear Aussie aren’t doing it.

    On a side note, is JK growing a vagina under his chin???Dmac was sensational tonight.

    H 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Yeetyaah on last edited by
    #209

    @yeetyaah said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    Never in doubt. Up the fucking Chiefs.

    I hate to think of the mess at your house right now.

    alt text

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #210

    @hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @hooroo said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @kiwimurph so hopefully it is done away with.

    Problem is in last 5 then Barrett has nothing yo lose using it

    Why? If the referee gives a shit penalty, why shouldn't it be challenged? Barrett had a go, as he is entitled to but the referees made the right decision.

    Because that’s the game we have loved for decades. Sometimes you get a shitter of a decision but that’s rugby.

    These referrals fucking suck. That chiefs one earlier was fucking dross. Kind of embarrassing

    You mean the one where the referees missed a penalty? We don't except a wrong decision made leading up to a try, so why would we accept a wrong penalty decision deciding a game?

    Waratahs, give us back our Super Rugby Title. Richie made a legal play and Joubert got it wrong!

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to Hooroo on last edited by
    #211

    @hooroo said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @hooroo said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @kiwimurph so hopefully it is done away with.

    Problem is in last 5 then Barrett has nothing yo lose using it

    Why? If the referee gives a shit penalty, why shouldn't it be challenged? Barrett had a go, as he is entitled to but the referees made the right decision.

    Because that’s the game we have loved for decades. Sometimes you get a shitter of a decision but that’s rugby.

    These referrals fucking suck. That chiefs one earlier was fucking dross. Kind of embarrassing

    You mean the one where the referees missed a penalty? We don't except a wrong decision made leading up to a try, so why would we accept a wrong penalty decision deciding a game?

    Because that’s rugby.

    Glad to hear Aussie aren’t doing it.

    On a side note, is JK growing a vagina under his chin???Dmac was sensational tonight.

    And it used to be rugby for clearly incorrect tries to be awarded and now both of us would be outraged if that happened.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #212

    Man our halfbacks are in poor form. Whenever Drummond is on and we maul, we always seem to lose momentum or results in a turnover. Has been going on for ages now. Are they even communicating to our forwards?

    N 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • N Online
    N Online
    Nevorian
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #213

    @act-crusader said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    Man our halfbacks are in poor form. Whenever Drummond is on and we maul, we always seem to lose momentum or results in a turnover. Has been going on for ages now. Are they even communicating to our forwards?

    And Bryn Hall, I am sure he is a few sandwiches short of a picnic

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • N Online
    N Online
    Nevorian
    wrote on last edited by
    #214

    Any thoughts on Barrett as a captain? I am not completely sold on him just yet

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • C Online
    C Online
    cliff
    wrote on last edited by
    #215

    Taukeiaho has alot of potential just needs to sort out his throwing

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    wrote on last edited by
    #216

    I thought at HT that the Crusaders would run away with it. So esp well done to the Chiefs. For this win and 4 in a row. Do they want Gatland back?

    HoorooH YeetyaahY 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    replied to Winger on last edited by
    #217
    This post is deleted!
    WingerW 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Nevorian on last edited by
    #218

    @nevorian said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    Any thoughts on Barrett as a captain? I am not completely sold on him just yet

    Still early days, only his second season.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders
Rugby Matches
crusaderschiefs
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.