• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusaderschiefs
256 Posts 51 Posters 9.4k Views
SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #190

    @taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @kiwimurph so hopefully it is done away with.

    Problem is in last 5 then Barrett has nothing yo lose using it

    Why? If the referee gives a shit penalty, why shouldn't it be challenged? Barrett had a go, as he is entitled to but the referees made the right decision.

    BonesB HoorooH 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #191

    @hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @gt12 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    I bang on about this but that poor exit by the Chiefs really sums up the difference between these teams. Those 20 metres make a huge difference

    Not really. Chiefs got back into the game through a poor exit by Reece.

    Key moment in the game. That and Richies missed kick. Great game though.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Toddy on last edited by
    #192

    @toddy said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    Great win by the Chiefs. They look a better team without the AB captain.

    That'sbait.gif

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #193

    @hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @kiwimurph so hopefully it is done away with.

    Problem is in last 5 then Barrett has nothing yo lose using it

    Why? If the referee gives a shit penalty, why shouldn't it be challenged? Barrett had a go, as he is entitled to but the referees made the right decision.

    My only concern with it there, was the chiefs wouldn't have been able to use their referral for a hit and hope against the saders that may have happened before the breakdown (e.g. the borderline obstruction by the player in front of the ball carrier).

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    wrote on last edited by
    #194

    What a comp though. Crusaders still the class above but the rest of the pack are just about there

    I think the Aussies are going to get a fucking hiding in the comp that starts after this finishes. What are the calling the comp?

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #195

    Ahem.

    Blues and Crusaders clearly the best two teams in the comp by a country mile.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mattasaurus
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #196

    @bones yeah those blues did real well last night.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #197

    Chiefs likely to make the final now.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #198

    @hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @kiwimurph so hopefully it is done away with.

    Problem is in last 5 then Barrett has nothing yo lose using it

    Why? If the referee gives a shit penalty, why shouldn't it be challenged? Barrett had a go, as he is entitled to but the referees made the right decision.

    Because that’s the game we have loved for decades. Sometimes you get a shitter of a decision but that’s rugby.

    These referrals fucking suck. That chiefs one earlier was fucking dross. Kind of embarrassing

    H 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    replied to Hooroo on last edited by
    #199

    @hooroo Nah, I think the Reds and the Brumbies will be very competitive.

    H 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to Hooroo on last edited by
    #200

    @hooroo said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @kiwimurph so hopefully it is done away with.

    Problem is in last 5 then Barrett has nothing yo lose using it

    Why? If the referee gives a shit penalty, why shouldn't it be challenged? Barrett had a go, as he is entitled to but the referees made the right decision.

    Because that’s the game we have loved for decades. Sometimes you get a shitter of a decision but that’s rugby.

    These referrals fucking suck. That chiefs one earlier was fucking dross. Kind of embarrassing

    You mean the one where the referees missed a penalty? We don't except a wrong decision made leading up to a try, so why would we accept a wrong penalty decision deciding a game?

    HoorooH ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to akan004 on last edited by
    #201

    @akan004 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @hooroo Nah, I think the Reds and the Brumbies will be very competitive.

    I think so. Especially over there. The other teams should get done though.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    wrote on last edited by
    #202

    Just realised the Crusaders jerseys say Cockram on them 😂

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to Mattasaurus on last edited by
    #203

    @mattasaurus said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @bones yeah those blues did real well last night.

    Clearly second best team in the comp

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #204

    @anonymous said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    Just realised the Crusaders jerseys say Cockram on them 😂

    No fucken way! With that logo too? You couldn't write this stuff....

    Oh grow up.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #205

    @bones But then I might cut myself shaving!

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #206

    @anonymous said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @bones But then I might cut myself shaving!

    You're welcome.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • YeetyaahY Offline
    YeetyaahY Offline
    Yeetyaah
    wrote on last edited by
    #207

    Never in doubt. Up the fucking Chiefs.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #208

    @hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @hooroo said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    @kiwimurph so hopefully it is done away with.

    Problem is in last 5 then Barrett has nothing yo lose using it

    Why? If the referee gives a shit penalty, why shouldn't it be challenged? Barrett had a go, as he is entitled to but the referees made the right decision.

    Because that’s the game we have loved for decades. Sometimes you get a shitter of a decision but that’s rugby.

    These referrals fucking suck. That chiefs one earlier was fucking dross. Kind of embarrassing

    You mean the one where the referees missed a penalty? We don't except a wrong decision made leading up to a try, so why would we accept a wrong penalty decision deciding a game?

    Because that’s rugby.

    Glad to hear Aussie aren’t doing it.

    On a side note, is JK growing a vagina under his chin???Dmac was sensational tonight.

    H 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to Yeetyaah on last edited by
    #209

    @yeetyaah said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:

    Never in doubt. Up the fucking Chiefs.

    I hate to think of the mess at your house right now.

    alt text

    1 Reply Last reply
    2

SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders
Rugby Matches
crusaderschiefs
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.