SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders
-
Crusaders are no better at game management than any other Super Rugby team in New Zealand. They beat teams by having better players. Their decision making is just as poor, IMO.
-
-
@taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@kiwimurph so hopefully it is done away with.
Problem is in last 5 then Barrett has nothing yo lose using it
Why? If the referee gives a shit penalty, why shouldn't it be challenged? Barrett had a go, as he is entitled to but the referees made the right decision.
-
@hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@gt12 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
I bang on about this but that poor exit by the Chiefs really sums up the difference between these teams. Those 20 metres make a huge difference
Not really. Chiefs got back into the game through a poor exit by Reece.
Key moment in the game. That and Richies missed kick. Great game though.
-
@toddy said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
Great win by the Chiefs. They look a better team without the AB captain.
That'sbait.gif
-
@hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@kiwimurph so hopefully it is done away with.
Problem is in last 5 then Barrett has nothing yo lose using it
Why? If the referee gives a shit penalty, why shouldn't it be challenged? Barrett had a go, as he is entitled to but the referees made the right decision.
My only concern with it there, was the chiefs wouldn't have been able to use their referral for a hit and hope against the saders that may have happened before the breakdown (e.g. the borderline obstruction by the player in front of the ball carrier).
-
@bones yeah those blues did real well last night.
-
@hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@kiwimurph so hopefully it is done away with.
Problem is in last 5 then Barrett has nothing yo lose using it
Why? If the referee gives a shit penalty, why shouldn't it be challenged? Barrett had a go, as he is entitled to but the referees made the right decision.
Because that’s the game we have loved for decades. Sometimes you get a shitter of a decision but that’s rugby.
These referrals fucking suck. That chiefs one earlier was fucking dross. Kind of embarrassing
-
@hooroo said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@kiwimurph so hopefully it is done away with.
Problem is in last 5 then Barrett has nothing yo lose using it
Why? If the referee gives a shit penalty, why shouldn't it be challenged? Barrett had a go, as he is entitled to but the referees made the right decision.
Because that’s the game we have loved for decades. Sometimes you get a shitter of a decision but that’s rugby.
These referrals fucking suck. That chiefs one earlier was fucking dross. Kind of embarrassing
You mean the one where the referees missed a penalty? We don't except a wrong decision made leading up to a try, so why would we accept a wrong penalty decision deciding a game?
-
-
@mattasaurus said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@bones yeah those blues did real well last night.
Clearly second best team in the comp
-
@anonymous said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
Just realised the Crusaders jerseys say Cockram on them
No fucken way! With that logo too? You couldn't write this stuff....
Oh grow up.
