SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders
-
-
@taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@kiwimurph so hopefully it is done away with.
Problem is in last 5 then Barrett has nothing yo lose using it
Why? If the referee gives a shit penalty, why shouldn't it be challenged? Barrett had a go, as he is entitled to but the referees made the right decision.
-
@hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@gt12 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
I bang on about this but that poor exit by the Chiefs really sums up the difference between these teams. Those 20 metres make a huge difference
Not really. Chiefs got back into the game through a poor exit by Reece.
Key moment in the game. That and Richies missed kick. Great game though.
-
@toddy said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
Great win by the Chiefs. They look a better team without the AB captain.
That'sbait.gif
-
@hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@kiwimurph so hopefully it is done away with.
Problem is in last 5 then Barrett has nothing yo lose using it
Why? If the referee gives a shit penalty, why shouldn't it be challenged? Barrett had a go, as he is entitled to but the referees made the right decision.
My only concern with it there, was the chiefs wouldn't have been able to use their referral for a hit and hope against the saders that may have happened before the breakdown (e.g. the borderline obstruction by the player in front of the ball carrier).
-
@bones yeah those blues did real well last night.
-
@hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@kiwimurph so hopefully it is done away with.
Problem is in last 5 then Barrett has nothing yo lose using it
Why? If the referee gives a shit penalty, why shouldn't it be challenged? Barrett had a go, as he is entitled to but the referees made the right decision.
Because that’s the game we have loved for decades. Sometimes you get a shitter of a decision but that’s rugby.
These referrals fucking suck. That chiefs one earlier was fucking dross. Kind of embarrassing
-
@hooroo said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@kiwimurph so hopefully it is done away with.
Problem is in last 5 then Barrett has nothing yo lose using it
Why? If the referee gives a shit penalty, why shouldn't it be challenged? Barrett had a go, as he is entitled to but the referees made the right decision.
Because that’s the game we have loved for decades. Sometimes you get a shitter of a decision but that’s rugby.
These referrals fucking suck. That chiefs one earlier was fucking dross. Kind of embarrassing
You mean the one where the referees missed a penalty? We don't except a wrong decision made leading up to a try, so why would we accept a wrong penalty decision deciding a game?
-
-
@mattasaurus said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@bones yeah those blues did real well last night.
Clearly second best team in the comp
-
@anonymous said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
Just realised the Crusaders jerseys say Cockram on them
No fucken way! With that logo too? You couldn't write this stuff....
Oh grow up.
-
-
@anonymous said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@bones But then I might cut myself shaving!
You're welcome.
