• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
1.3k Posts 89 Posters 104.9k Views
TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98)
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to gt12 on last edited by Chris B.
    #1087

    @gt12 said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
    The kicking has and will be a problem, and may be the losing of a game, but I don’t see how we’ll beat teams kicking penalties anyway.

    That's dangerously close to what Robbie Deans said in 2003. I think his words were, "Goal kicking won't be a point of difference".

    I thought at the time that wasn't his sharpest observation. 🙂

    Lots of scenarios where kicking the extra goal can prove crucial.

    Chester DrawsC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • pukunuiP Offline
    pukunuiP Offline
    pukunui
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #1088

    @gt12 said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    I think we miss Dmac.

    Him at 15 kicking goals, BB at 10, and RM off the bench, and we’d be far more dangerous (or any other combination that doesn’t involve Dmac starting at 10 as well).

    Given the cattle we’ve got, I think we should start Barrett at 10, get Smith back to 15, and go full out attack. Bring Richie (and probably ALB, although it would be Laumape or Ennor in my team) off the bench with 20 to go, and try to run wild. The kicking has and will be a problem, and may be the losing of a game, but I don’t see how we’ll beat teams kicking penalties anyway.

    If we do want to play Barrett at FB, then Smith’s position has to be under threat ala Mils in 2011. Luckily for Smith, Bridge was lost on defense, which may be his savior.

    Hmm I don’t know. Dmac was a big part of the team last year and we sucked then too. If anything the loss of Dmac will force them to dial back the attack at all costs helter skelter style they looked to be going for last year. That style isn’t going to help stop all the handling errors that have been killing our attack.
    RM-BB is a step in the right direction to a style that can win a RWC IMO. But it needs time to bed in because we wasted last season on BB-Dmac which was too far to one extreme and provided no variation.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    wrote on last edited by
    #1089

    Interestingly and for some weird reason BB doesn't seem to have a problem when kicking in the second half of the season. He's been at or near 100% the past three tours I think. Maybe it won't be an issue but I obviously wouldn't bet the house on that.

    BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    DMX
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #1090

    @gt12

    I don't think its some kind of a choice that we are not scoring tries. Lets look at the last 4 test quality games we have played, SA, Argentina, Ireland and England, off the top of my head I don't even know if we managed a try a game. 2015 I think we had a much more coherent attack but Carter's boot was still critical in the semi and final. My biggest dissapoinment with Bender is he looked like no chance to beat his man on the outside but I would still want him in the team a WC knockout match. 1st 3 names on backs teamsheet BB, Mounga and Bender.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester Draws
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #1091

    @Chris-B said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @gt12 said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
    The kicking has and will be a problem, and may be the losing of a game, but I don’t see how we’ll beat teams kicking penalties anyway.

    That's dangerously close to what Robbie Deans said in 2003. I think his words were, "Goal kicking won't be a point of difference".

    I thought at the time that wasn't his sharpest observation. 🙂

    > Lots of scenarios where kicking the extra goal can prove crucial.

    Every tight final, ever.

    Two finals have been decided on drop-kicks. Last time it was only a drop kick got us home over the Boks in the semis.

    The second last Cup it was a long range penalty by Beaver that won it for us.

    Any team without an accurate goal-kicker and some drop goal ability is just waiting to be beaten in a tight game.

    RapidoR taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
    6
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to Chester Draws on last edited by
    #1092

    @Chester-Draws said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Chris-B said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @gt12 said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
    The kicking has and will be a problem, and may be the losing of a game, but I don’t see how we’ll beat teams kicking penalties anyway.

    That's dangerously close to what Robbie Deans said in 2003. I think his words were, "Goal kicking won't be a point of difference".

    I thought at the time that wasn't his sharpest observation. 🙂

    Lots of scenarios where kicking the extra goal can prove crucial.

    Every tight final, ever.

    Two finals have been decided on drop-kicks. Last time it was only a drop kick got us home over the Boks in the semis.

    The second last Cup it was a long range penalty by Beaver that won it for us.

    Any team without an accurate goal-kicker and some drop goal ability is just waiting to be beaten in a tight game.

    The part I have bolded. It could be said of that the 2011 final - a partial reason it was so close was that Weepu left 8 points on the table in the first half - with his poor goalkicking that night. Not a criticism, we were down to like 4th choice 10s (6th choice if you count the self-exiled like Nick Evans and Luke McAllister) and an emergency goalkicker.

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #1093

    The concerning thing is that BB as the senior player apparently decides who is going to kick, he or RM. I read early this morning that the only reason that BB asked RM to take over the kicking duties in the test against the Boks was because BB had cramp in his calf. What if he hadn't asked?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Chester Draws on last edited by
    #1094

    @Chester-Draws Donald misses that kick, game restarts at 22, not half way...so you dont know what happens after that...maybe they restart, Read takes ball on full runs 30m to score...maybe they catch on full run 75m and score...

    Chester DrawsC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
    #1095

    while our defence has been very good in the past 2 games, on reflection v SA we gave up alot down the left wing, when both Ioane and Bridge were there, so I did wonder if it points more to whatever structure they are trying to play than both players finding themselves out of position a number of times?

    I dont recall it being an issue v Argentina, but then we did play slightly differently again, either that or Rassie saw a weakness in our defensive structure there from that game?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    dejo
    replied to Rapido on last edited by
    #1096

    @Rapido

    YES a criticism. Weepu had a corked hammy and they a) still played him and b) still had him taking kicks even though the brains trust and himself knew he wasn’t 100% fit.

    WTF!!!!

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    wrote on last edited by
    #1097

    I think in 2015 bb played that impact player coming off the bench better than what we saw from dmac,

    I think bb is still as good now as he was then , it’s a matter of utilising it,

    I suspect and I might be wrong, starting rm might be a ploy of giving him extra minutes to get him ready, but they will revert back to bb starting at 10, rm to come on with bb to go back to 15 to change up the shape and style of attack

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to dejo on last edited by
    #1098

    @dejo said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Rapido

    YES a criticism. Weepu had a corked hammy and they a) still played him and b) still had him taking kicks even though the brains trust and himself knew he wasn’t 100% fit.

    WTF!!!!

    My recollection was Weepu tweaked his hammy in warmups but didn't tell anyone. Had someone else taken those kicks, the French would've been out of the game and you wouldn't have the retards continuing to protest that they were robbed.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester Draws
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by Chester Draws
    #1099

    @taniwharugby said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    Donald misses that kick, game restarts at 22, not half way...so you dont know what happens after that...maybe they restart, Read takes ball on full runs 30m passes to a winger, it is intercepted and they score at the other end ...

    Man, that's dark.

    I prefer my version where our good kicker scores the three points though.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #1100

    Two things:

    (1) The commentators said that BB's goal kicking success rate during super rugby was 79%. RM's was 77%.
    (2) Gilbert rugby balls will be used at the RWC not Adidas balls. I remember Carter had a preference for one over the other.

    StargazerS gt12G 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #1101

    @Bovidae RM changed his kicking routine during the season, which significantly increased his success rate. During the finals, his kicking success rate was 100%.

    R gt12G ChrisC 3 Replies Last reply
    2
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #1102

    @Bovidae said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    Two things:

    (1) The commentators said that BB's goal kicking success rate during super rugby was 79%. RM's was 77%.
    (2) Gilbert rugby balls will be used at the RWC not Adidas balls. I remember Carter had a preference for one over the other.

    Good point. Rugby pass has discussed this (link below).

    Richie has kicked well for the ABs so far (87% but only 15 attempts), but this season, Barrett was kicking better (81% according to rugbypass in comparison to 77%). Dmac was better than that though, with 86% (only 35 attempts, due to injury, but he was kicking very well). That percentage would make him up with the very best.

    An inconvenient truth - The astounding difference in Beauden Barrett's goal kicking percentage based on ball brand

    An inconvenient truth - The astounding difference in Beauden Barrett's goal kicking percentage based on ball brand

    In exploring a left-field explanation for his up-and-down results, we looked at his goal-kicking statistics when considering the type of ball used and found an astounding difference.

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to gt12 on last edited by Stargazer
    #1103

    @gt12 Rugbypass' stats are unreliable. Moreover, stats over a longer period of time don't take into account changes I was referring to in my previous post.

    gt12G BovidaeB 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #1104

    @Stargazer said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Bovidae RM changed his kicking routine during the season, which significantly increased his success rate. During the finals, his kicking success rate was 100%.

    Yeah Richie was crap early, then 24/25 to finish up this season. Better last year too. He's the more reliable kicker.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #1105

    @Stargazer said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Bovidae RM changed his kicking routine during the season, which significantly increased his success rate. During the finals, his kicking success rate was 100%.

    Another good point!

    One interesting thing for me is that Richie kicks ridiculously well at home 85%, but not so well away (60%). Barrett is the opposite at about 85%.

    That could be due to where tries are scored though! Also, the Saders take less penalty kicks too.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #1106

    @Stargazer said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @gt12 Rugbypass' stats are unreliable. Moreover, stats over a longer period of time don't take into account changes I was referring to in my previous post.

    Rugbypass kick stats are the same - we're not talking tackles made here. But, to satisfy you, I've used other stats in my next post.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98)
Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.