• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

AB "What could have been" XV

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
300 Posts 65 Posters 11.7k Views
AB "What could have been" XV
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #245

    @sparky said in AB "What could have been" XV:

    @Catogrande Maitland's yet another poach from Tokoroa.

    Yes. I see I’m going to have to up my sarcasm game.

    sparkyS mofitzy_M 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    replied to Frank on last edited by
    #246

    @shark said in AB "What could have been" XV:

    I know EXACTLY how your mate feels, although thankfully it wasn't Caleb Ralph who shagged my wife before we met, but another Canterbury / Crusaders AB of dubious qualification. This made cheering for Canterbury in particular a little odd at times.

    ...

    @Frank said in AB "What could have been" XV:

    @shark
    Cheers.
    What was wrong with his style of play?
    I can't remember why he was dropped.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #247

    @sparky Agree re Brett Iti. He'd have played 20 tests in the current environment.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #248

    @Nepia Yeah, probably one of the biggest indictments on Mains' career was not being able to recognise Bachop as the best 9. In fact he selected Ant Strachan, Jon Preston, Stu Forster and I'm sure at least one other ahead of Bachop, although I seem to recall Bachop wasn't actually available for each of Mains' seasons?

    ACT CrusaderA dogmeatD 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by sparky
    #249

    @Catogrande said in AB "What could have been" XV:

    @sparky said in AB "What could have been" XV:

    @Catogrande Maitland's yet another poach from Tokoroa.

    Yes. I see I’m going to have to up my sarcasm game.

    You were being sarcastic. Wow, never guessed that for one second. 😉

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by
    #250

    @Catogrande
    Tokoroa poaching is a joke harking back to when Stephen Jones claimed Mealamu (?) was poached from the island of Tokoroa. Tokoroa is a small town in NZ.

    CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #251

    @shark said in AB "What could have been" XV:

    @Nepia Yeah, probably one of the biggest indictments on Mains' career was not being able to recognise Bachop as the best 9. In fact he selected Ant Strachan, Jon Preston, Stu Forster and I'm sure at least one other ahead of Bachop, although I seem to recall Bachop wasn't actually available for each of Mains' seasons?

    Man I’m having terrible flashbacks to the Forster/Ellis and Forster/Mannix AB combinations in 93 and 94...

    Bachop did come back into the team for that 94 Boks home series.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #252

    Why do I have faint memories of Bachop being unavailable because he was playing in Japan or Italy or something?

    sharkS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #253

    @Bones Yeah i think for one season. Maybe 1993?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    wrote on last edited by
    #254

    Billy Tell

    What could have been.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #255

    @shark Grim played for Mains in 92 but wasn't in the best of form and was dropped. He was unavailable in 93 . He then moved from Linwood to Old Boys because he was in his own words, Jaded. He played with a young Mehrts outside him and forced his way back into the AB's in 94. Mains wasn't the greatest selector but I don't think he was to blame for Bachops time away from the test side.

    Post 91 RWC there was the need for a clean out and also a number of players who seemed to lose their enthusiasm for the game. Even Foxy

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    wrote on last edited by
    #256

    Uncle Lozza was just an out and out terrible selector. A real experimentalist. Not helped by having Peter Thorburn alongside him, of course.

    When he started stamping his mark in 1992 - initially in a trial - he showed his hand immediately. Bernie McCahill was selected at 10 (albeit pretty much as a way to show him the door), and then he selected the likes of Pod Turner in his World XV series squad and tried Walter Little at 10 also. It took Mains until 1994 to recognise Zinny's value as well.

    That initial squad included an influx of Otago players in Paul Henderson, Jamie Joseph, Arran Pene, Marc Ellis and Greg Cooper.

    The third test was when he dropped Bachop for Strachan.

    Mains was all over the show. Luckily, Mehrts, Kronfeld, Jonah and Osborne emerged in 1994 and by 1995 he had sensibly settled on the experienced Auckland core of his pack in Brown, Fitzy, Dowd, R Brooke, Jones and Zinny.

    DuluthD dogmeatD boobooB 3 Replies Last reply
    2
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #257

    @shark said in AB "What could have been" XV:

    Uncle Lozza was just an out and out terrible selector. A real experimentalist. Not helped by having Peter Thorburn alongside him, of course.

    ..and Earle Kirton. He thought Marc Ellis was a ten and Wilson could take the goalkicking

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #258

    @Duluth said in AB "What could have been" XV:

    @shark said in AB "What could have been" XV:

    Uncle Lozza was just an out and out terrible selector. A real experimentalist. Not helped by having Peter Thorburn alongside him, of course.

    ..and Earle Kirton. He thought Marc Ellis was a ten and Wilson could take the goalkicking

    ......and they all thought Liam Barry was an All Black

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #259

    Matthew Cooper out of position at 12 was another face palm.

    boobooB sharkS 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #260

    @shark I agree Mains was a poor selector but its BS to say he didn't realise Zinny's value. Brooke played in all the tests against Oz in 92 and against SA and was an ever present under Mains. Pene did start in a Lions Test in 93 and against England that year (Zinnie was at 6) but Pene was Player of the years that season so Mains wasn't alone in thinking he had the goods.

    The Auckland tight 5 was pretty much locked in for all of Mains tenure although Loe when available was preferred to Dowd. It was Wyllie who failed to see how good Brown and R Brooke were not Mains.

    Mains was the forwards coach and usually had us going well. It was Thorburn in the backs who tried all the crazy shit.

    @MN5 In 96 Hart said Liam Barry was the unluckiest player in NZ not to make the squad to go to SA. If you're talking overrated AB open sides it's Hart who had the hard on for Mark Carter....

    Most coaches have made some dubious selection calls but it certainly wasn't Lauries strength

    MN5M sharkS 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by MN5
    #261

    @dogmeat said in AB "What could have been" XV:

    @shark I agree Mains was a poor selector but its BS to say he didn't realise Zinny's value. Brooke played in all the tests against Oz in 92 and against SA and was an ever present under Mains. Pene did start in a Lions Test in 93 and against England that year (Zinnie was at 6) but Pene was Player of the years that season so Mains wasn't alone in thinking he had the goods.

    The Auckland tight 5 was pretty much locked in for all of Mains tenure although Loe when available was preferred to Dowd. It was Wyllie who failed to see how good Brown and R Brooke were not Mains.

    Mains was the forwards coach and usually had us going well. It was Thorburn in the backs who tried all the crazy shit.

    @MN5 In 96 Hart said Liam Barry was the unluckiest player in NZ not to make the squad to go to SA. If you're talking overrated AB open sides it's Hart who had the hard on for Mark Carter....

    Most coaches have made some dubious selection calls but it certainly wasn't Lauries strength

    Carter at the very least had one outstanding game against Oz. He got a lot of unjustified hatred when he was playing.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    replied to mofitzy_ on last edited by
    #262

    @mofitzy_ said in AB "What could have been" XV:

    @Catogrande
    Tokoroa poaching is a joke harking back to when Stephen Jones claimed Mealamu (?) was poached from the island of Tokoroa. Tokoroa is a small town in NZ.

    Yes. Thank you. Was aware.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #263

    @shark said in AB "What could have been" XV:

    Uncle Lozza was just an out and out terrible selector. A real experimentalist. Not helped by having Peter Thorburn alongside him, of course.

    When he started stamping his mark in 1992 - initially in a trial - he showed his hand immediately. Bernie McCahill was selected at 10 (albeit pretty much as a way to show him the door), and then he selected the likes of Pod Turner in his World XV series squad and tried Walter Little at 10 also. It took Mains until 1994 to recognise Zinny's value as well.

    That initial squad included an influx of Otago players in Paul Henderson, Jamie Joseph, Arran Pene, Marc Ellis and Greg Cooper.

    The third test was when he dropped Bachop for Strachan.

    Mains was all over the show. Luckily, Mehrts, Kronfeld, Jonah and Osborne emerged in 1994 and by 1995 he had sensibly settled on the experienced Auckland core of his pack in Brown, Fitzy, Dowd, R Brooke, Jones and Zinny.

    Pod Turner was quite a good player. I recall watching him in a HB v Akl Ranfurly Shield match and he was just everywhere. Became a fanboi but he never really lived up to that level again. Pne for 'the what could have been' thread .

    Little was a 10 all through age group and in his initial first class footy. Hardly surprising he was looked at as a 10 first up. ( Bernie McCahill though ... )

    Those Otago players were all pretty deserving, at least of squad places (with perhaps the exception of Pene).

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #264

    @Tim said in AB "What could have been" XV:

    Matthew Cooper out of position at 12 was another face palm.

    Played Cooper at 12 (Putaruru v Hamilton Marist).

    Didn't seem out of position.

    Seemed kind very fucking big. And fast. And likely to injure me just by moving in my direction.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0

AB "What could have been" XV
Sports Talk
allblacks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.