All Blacks vs Springboks II
-
@act-crusader said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:
@pakman said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:
Interesting thing that there were four distinct periods.
First 15: to and fro
Second 20 ABs on top.
Third 25 Boks dominated (14 unanswered points)
Last 20 ABs on top.
Big impact from bench. From 35 to 60 where Boks were best, and we were at our worst.
Will be focus of my rewatch.No thanks….😉
The only test match I have missed in the last 25 years is the 99 semi and to this day I have not watched it. I have seen the odd highlight here or there but I refuse to sit down and put myself through it.
The first half is worth a watch 😎
-
@bones lesson learned after 2007 was to take the ref out of the equation. ABs did enough to win today, especially from 25-20 down. Boks also did enough, especially from 20-11 down.
Tight game, small margins. ABs wind the clock down and I'm sure it would South African fans bemoaning the calls not going their way.
-
@stodders said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:
@bones lesson learned after 2007 was to take the ref out of the equation. ABs did enough to win today, especially from 25-20 down. Boks also did enough, especially from 20-11 down.
Tight game, small margins. ABs wind the clock down and I'm sure it would South African fans bemoaning the calls not going their way.
It wouldn't be the first time they were wrong.
Might have been nice to see some new armbands though.
-
As an aside that SA medic is lovely. If I were a bok I’d be sure to have a permanent groin niggle that needed attending to before the big match.
-
@billy-tell said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:
As an aside that SA medic is lovely. If I were a bok I’d be sure to have a permanent groin niggle that needed attending to before the big match.
What's his name?
-
@bones said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:
@billy-tell said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:
As an aside that SA medic is lovely. If I were a bok I’d be sure to have a permanent groin niggle that needed attending to before the big match.
What's his name?
Bones. Keep up the good work mate. I’m a fan.
-
@act-crusader said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:
@pakman said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:
Interesting thing that there were four distinct periods.
First 15: to and fro
Second 20 ABs on top.
Third 25 Boks dominated (14 unanswered points)
Last 20 ABs on top.
Big impact from bench. From 35 to 60 where Boks were best, and we were at our worst.
Will be focus of my rewatch.No thanks….😉
The only test match I have missed in the last 25 years is the 99 semi and to this day I have not watched it. I have seen the odd highlight here or there but I refuse to sit down and put myself through it.
It's the '19 semi for me. I'm still angry....
-
@billy-tell said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:
@bones said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:
@billy-tell said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:
As an aside that SA medic is lovely. If I were a bok I’d be sure to have a permanent groin niggle that needed attending to before the big match.
What's his name?
Bones. Keep up the good work mate. I’m a fan.
I'm no South African medic tho eh
-
@stodders said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:
@bones lesson learned after 2007 was to take the ref out of the equation. ABs did enough to win today, especially from 25-20 down. Boks also did enough, especially from 20-11 down.
Tight game, small margins. ABs wind the clock down and I'm sure it would South African fans bemoaning the calls not going their way.
I would hate to think what the scores would've been if jordie hasn't been available these two matches, we'd have lost both by a big margin
-
@gt12 said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:
@tim said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:
Worst ref I've seen in ages.
I think its really hard to be good in a game like this.
I often wonder if non-neutral refs would be better for SA-NZ games. They'd be less phased by the occasion and would be under so much scrutiny and weight of tradition to be impartial that we'd get better reffing.
-
Just watched the 2nd half again. Richie made a blunder in the 73rd minute unfortunately, had an overlap with Sevu, Rieko and ALB outside of him on the South African 22, and there was a good chance that a try would have been scored as there was so much of space but he chose to take it up himself. Wasn't catastrophic as we got a penalty from the next ruck but a 7 pointer then would have meant that the Boks would have had to score a try to win it.
-
@victor-meldrew said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:
@machpants said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:
Foster's team with no ability too deal with this shit.
Been there long before Foster took over. Thought there were signs of improvement but the last 2 games have exposed that thought
Thus late Hansen/foster, as I said. Hansen should have retired post lions as originally planned, foster would have had his go at RWC 19, this would now be second year of a decent, innovative set up. But this cycle is a wash out
-
Cant get away from the fact the Bok forwards were just better They deserved to win Regrettably some of our forwards dont have a McCaw motor
-
@berniescorner said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:
Cant get away from the fact the Bok forwards were just better They deserved to win Regrettably some of our forwards dont have a McCaw motor
I think the selections of Bower and Aumua were a mistake. Karl T is easily our second best scrumaging loosehad and Samisoni Taukei'aho is our form hooker atm, and is a better lineout thrower than Aumua.
We had to know that our weaker props were going to come up against their strongest front row in the 2nd half and the gap in class was evident between the two front rows during that period. Should have selected the best players available, last night was not a time for experimentation and we have paid the price for it.
-
@billy-tell said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:
I don't like having a go at the match officials, and fair play to Carling for having the guts to whistle penalties at the end, but there bad calls both ways. The worst for mine though was Mpimpi being a good few metres offside on the kick chase, not spotted by anyone.
I was yelling at the TV then. It wasn't even close and the AR was right there.
-
@pakman said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:
Rewatch 36 to 66.
ABs lineout better than Boks's in period!!!! Only miss Aumua throwing directly to Kitshoff and not to Patty T. BBBR jumping forced Bok miss at 36. Akira pressure another at 48. Akira took several in meantime (and beautiful one for Savea try).
Scrum slightly moving forward except first of H2, following Jordie (non-) forward pass. Bok TH twisted, which ref ruled Moody infringement. Wrong side for camera. Props looked bemused.
Ref's inconsisitency on tackle release directly caused the result. Not just BB at 38 (Faf never released), but also at 54:30 followng a period of AB pressure, when Etzebeth held on to Jordie and Marx given penalty. Huge swing.
Even worse, in next minute Kitshoff was about to be turned over 5m out from AB line and ABs penalised for... 'no clear release'!!! Led to penalty dead in front and 3.
At 50 Steyn 50/22 MASSIVE. Good LO/maul/momentum. Poor short side defence and Boks over. Also huge Steyn kick gain at 58.
Perhaps most damning, though, from 46 to 48 ABs hot on attack. Several recyclings but pattern of ball to BB and then Havili not aligned for backline move. BBBR couple of time gets pass with nowhere to go.
BUT NO OTHER TIGHTIES TO BE SEEN. FFS LJ and BB trying to bind and defend counter ruck???
Also at 66 RM gets ball but Bok fish hook cuts him off from rest of backline. Shepherded into pod of e.g. Marx/Kwagga/a lock.
Our backline alignment/interplay with forwards was non-existent?! And Boks had done homework.
Forwards always in wrong place and unavailable for cleanout. Was there no plan?
TBC...
That no clear release made me lose my shit. He'd suddenly discovered that law after just ignoring it minutes before.
-
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:
@pakman said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:
Rewatch 36 to 66.
ABs lineout better than Boks's in period!!!! Only miss Aumua throwing directly to Kitshoff and not to Patty T. BBBR jumping forced Bok miss at 36. Akira pressure another at 48. Akira took several in meantime (and beautiful one for Savea try).
Scrum slightly moving forward except first of H2, following Jordie (non-) forward pass. Bok TH twisted, which ref ruled Moody infringement. Wrong side for camera. Props looked bemused.
Ref's inconsisitency on tackle release directly caused the result. Not just BB at 38 (Faf never released), but also at 54:30 followng a period of AB pressure, when Etzebeth held on to Jordie and Marx given penalty. Huge swing.
Even worse, in next minute Kitshoff was about to be turned over 5m out from AB line and ABs penalised for... 'no clear release'!!! Led to penalty dead in front and 3.
At 50 Steyn 50/22 MASSIVE. Good LO/maul/momentum. Poor short side defence and Boks over. Also huge Steyn kick gain at 58.
Perhaps most damning, though, from 46 to 48 ABs hot on attack. Several recyclings but pattern of ball to BB and then Havili not aligned for backline move. BBBR couple of time gets pass with nowhere to go.
BUT NO OTHER TIGHTIES TO BE SEEN. FFS LJ and BB trying to bind and defend counter ruck???
Also at 66 RM gets ball but Bok fish hook cuts him off from rest of backline. Shepherded into pod of e.g. Marx/Kwagga/a lock.
Our backline alignment/interplay with forwards was non-existent?! And Boks had done homework.
Forwards always in wrong place and unavailable for cleanout. Was there no plan?
TBC...
That no clear release made me lose my shit. He'd suddenly discovered that law after just ignoring it minutes before.
Me, too!
-
@billy-tell said in All Blacks vs Springboks II:
As an aside that SA medic is lovely. If I were a bok I’d be sure to have a permanent groin niggle that needed attending to
beforeduring the big match.What is this before you speak of?
