• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Crusaders v Hurricanes

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusadershurricanes
263 Posts 41 Posters 4.2k Views
Crusaders v Hurricanes
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by
    #230

    @canes4life said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @chris it’s frustrating as a supporter seeing two mediocre players get picked time and time again. Nothings going to change until they do a complete clean out of the organisation.

    Yeah I think you are right some strange selections and recruitment at the Canes recently.
    The Crusaders have put a lot of work into their academies and are signing players straight out of them
    Newell,Williams,Punivai Isi,Fhiyaki and Darry For the Blues they have some serious talent to pick from next year.
    If I Was recruiting for another SR team I would be raiding the Crusaders Academies.
    Finlay Brewis Prop,Zach Gallagher Lock/no6,Luke Donaldson Hb,Campbell Parata First five,Taine Robinson FB/mf,Timoci Tavatavanawai wing,Will Tucker lock, all good talent.
    Will be in SR next season somewhere I would think.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #231

    @stargazer I go along with Flanders getting on at 8, but not sure what we do at 6, Prinsep to me is a good journeyman mitre 10 cup player and not a lot more. If I had to pick I would try and work Kirifi in just because he is from the region. I not into us using journeyman from outside!

    HigginsH NepiaN 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #232

    @stargazer said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    I agree with other comments about Flanders.

    Thats a surprise. But I would like to see him at 6. To replace Prinsep who was poor. Unless say Fifita starts at 6

    HigginsH 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    wrote on last edited by Billy Tell
    #233

    Screenshot 2021-03-07 at 08.11.11.jpg

    Laumape needs to go and play league. His whole match summed up at the end, where the Hurricane replacement wing sets Laumape free with a 2 on 1. Instead of draw and pass...he cuts back infield...to take contact. As poor as he was, Dallas McLeod had a more than decent game.

    Lineout: The player throwing in the ball stands on the mark of touch with both feet outside the field of play. The thrower must not step into the field of play until the ball has been thrown.

    Field of play: The area between the goal lines and the touch lines. Those lines are not part of the field of play.

    Are we saying that heels touching the touchline means the player is outside the field of play, and therefore the lineout is OK?

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by
    #234

    I know it is affected by the YC, but one key issue - that can be addressed - was a lack of balance in the loosies and Ardie not being as effective at 8. Ardie made all of 5 tackles today and was OK with the ball (he got 23 metres and beat three defenders) but got no help. Prinsep made 11 tackles and ran for 2 metres - that’s not enough from a 6 at this level and in his short stint Flanders was busy on both sides of the ball.

    I know this won’t make them a team to be feared (the front five are the problem there) but if they can get the loosie balance right, they may be able to make up for it. IWL had a quiet game, they’ll need heaps from him to improve. I’d even be tempted to put Fifita at lock with him or Fifita off the bench if they must start Blackwell. If they bring Coles back and have healthy props and Aumua back, they’ll beat the Chiefs and give the Landers a good go.

    ToddyT BonesB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote on last edited by sparky
    #235

    Shambolic 2nd quarter from the Hurricanes. Played okay in the other three, but lack the players to be competitive against top teams this year. The problem has been the recruitment policy for the past five or six years, not enough ambition or forward-thinking. Ardie must play 7, Flanders should start. But the real problem is the roster.

    Congratulations to the Crusaders, again. I thought Mo'unga controlled the game well.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ToddyT Offline
    ToddyT Offline
    Toddy
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #236

    @gt12 said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    I know it is affected by the YC, but one key issue - that can be addressed - was a lack of balance in the loosies and Ardie not being as effective at 8. Ardie made all of 5 tackles today and was OK with the ball (he got 23 metres and beat three defenders) but got no help. Prinsep made 11 tackles and ran for 2 metres - that’s not enough from a 6 at this level and in his short stint Flanders was busy on both sides of the ball.

    Ardie ran 50-60m down the field in one of his runs. Does that mean he had a sh*tload of carries that made negative metres to bring it back to 23m?

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Toddy on last edited by
    #237

    @toddy said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @gt12 said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    I know it is affected by the YC, but one key issue - that can be addressed - was a lack of balance in the loosies and Ardie not being as effective at 8. Ardie made all of 5 tackles today and was OK with the ball (he got 23 metres and beat three defenders) but got no help. Prinsep made 11 tackles and ran for 2 metres - that’s not enough from a 6 at this level and in his short stint Flanders was busy on both sides of the ball.

    Ardie ran 50-60m down the field in one of his runs. Does that mean he had a sh*tload of carries that made negative metres to bring it back to 23m?

    Possibly:

    https://www.espn.com/rugby/playerstats?gameId=593054&league=289271

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #238

    Nice to see a ref actually pull up the correct scrum for wheeling

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • O Offline
    O Offline
    Old Samurai Jack
    wrote on last edited by
    #239

    Blackadder was really good. Like Tom Robinson, I wonder the way he plays makes it inevitable he'll get injured at some stage. Cullen Grace, Christie, and Blackadder are going to be a formidable force in the years to come. But did you see Grace run into Ardie and Ardie gave him a bit of a rough up? The old bull just saying, "don't get ahead of yourself young fella".
    Can't wait for the Crusaders vs Blues match. The clash of the loosies will be fascinating.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #240

    @stargazer said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    JGB always looks like he is carrying a spare tire. Hooker masquerading as a 10.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to gt12 on last edited by Bones
    #241

    @gt12 said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    he got 23 metres

    Ok that smells a bit fishy... didn't he make a near 50m run in one go?

    All his other runs were backwards?

    Oh hashtag booboo

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Billy Tell on last edited by
    #242

    @billy-tell what happens if you stand on the touchline with the ball?

    I'm intrigued this seems a new occurrence to you though! Is Riccitelli the only one that does it? I wonder if the crusaders hooker was also doing it...

    Billy TellB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #243

    @bones said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @billy-tell what happens if you stand on the touchline with the ball?

    I'm intrigued this seems a new occurrence to you though! Is Riccitelli the only one that does it? I wonder if the crusaders hooker was also doing it...

    Not a new occurrence no. It's de rigueur with every hooker. I've no doubt Taylor did it too. Not that I was trying to single our RR (who was nevertheless fairl diabolical), but I remember Grant Fox having a try ruled out for the hooker having his foot in the field of the play.

    Since you ask, if you stand on the touchline with the ball, you are in touch.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to akan004 on last edited by pakman
    #244

    @akan004 said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    I don't see why the referees have to always agree with the TMO's explanation.

    The ball clearly went forward. The hands did not clearly go back.

    Once upon a time that was called a forward pass.

    TMOs now seem to have a different book of laws?

    BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to Steven Harris on last edited by
    #245

    @steven-harris said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @yeetyaah problem is not Laumape ..the forwards Ardie aside are just not getting over the gain line

    IWL made some yards.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #246

    @pakman said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @akan004 said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    I don't see why the referees have to always agree with the TMO's explanation.

    The ball clearly went forward. The hands did not clearly go back.

    Once upon a time that was called a knock on.

    TMOs now seem to have a different book of laws?

    It was Pickerill, who is so average as a ref, and now seems to aspire to be like Skeen as a TMO.

    HigginsH 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • HigginsH Offline
    HigginsH Offline
    Higgins
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #247

    @chris said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @canes4life said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @chris there seems to be one twit in the crowd.

    There is in every crowd I have been to the cake tin

    Excuse me, I have not been to a Hurricanes game in the Cake Tin for a couple of years now!

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • HigginsH Offline
    HigginsH Offline
    Higgins
    replied to Dan54 on last edited by
    #248

    @dan54 said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @stargazer I go along with Flanders getting on at 8, but not sure what we do at 6, Prinsep to me is a good journeyman mitre 10 cup player and not a lot more. If I had to pick I would try and work Kirifi in just because he is from the region. I not into us using journeyman from outside!

    Kirifi is from Taranaki so he can bugger off to the Chiefs.

    Dan54D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • HigginsH Offline
    HigginsH Offline
    Higgins
    replied to Winger on last edited by Higgins
    #249

    @winger said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @stargazer said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    I agree with other comments about Flanders.

    Thats a surprise. But I would like to see him at 6. To replace Prinsep who was poor. Unless say Fifita starts at 6

    The type of game they are asking Fifita to play is miles away from the wide ranging style of play where he scored a good number of tries out wide when he was first selected under Chris Boyd's stewardship (for the Lions and the Hurricanes). They have since tried to turn him into more of a battering ram hit it up one or two off the ruck ball carrier where he is only moderately successful compared to what he used to be.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2

Crusaders v Hurricanes
Rugby Matches
crusadershurricanes
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.