Crusaders v Hurricanes
-
Interesting decision. No problem with it but they won't be consistent from game to game. Seen players carded for similar.
-
-
@taniwharugby said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:
probably give Sam a card for his contact too
First thing I thought too, both shoulder to chest/shoulder/chin
-
@steven-harris Worrying thing is even last year the Canes won this game. This year I didn't bother watching it because it was a foregone conclusion.
-
-
Canes loose trio running a lot in that passage to rest an arm on each subsequent ruck. Not much else.
-
@crazy-horse have to say no attempt to wrap arm which is the first thing they say. An inconsistent decision.
-
-
Get Flanders on, fuck Holland must seriously have a hard on for Prinsep.
-
@chris there seems to be one twit in the crowd.
-
@crucial said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:
These referrals are pissing me off. They seem against the spirit of the game somehow.
Park players more likely to argue with the ref as a result. It's a dumb idea only a moran could come up with.
-
-
-
-
@crucial said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:
These referrals are pissing me off. They seem against the spirit of the game somehow.
I can see that, rugby always at least kind of image of this 110kg 2m bloke going “sorry sir”...where this is a straight up, “you got that wrong”
-
@canes4life said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:
@chris there seems to be one twit in the crowd.
There is in every crowd I have been to the cake tin
-
-
@gt12 said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:
@gt12 said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:
Ardie in trouble here I assume.
Pretty clear that I shouldn’t be a TMO.
I wonder what the TMO was actually going to say. The fact he says 'yep' doesn't prove much, they very rarely disagree with one another.
-
