• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Hurricanes v Chiefs

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
hurricaneschiefs
326 Posts 40 Posters 8.6k Views
Hurricanes v Chiefs
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #9

    @tim said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

    @nepia said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

    Prinsep

    Signed for another year, I think.

    I know, that's why I said contract extension. 😉

    I'm just wondering if any Ferners rate him highly.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frank
    wrote on last edited by
    #10

    Chiefs for the win. I think their forward pack is better.
    Fifita can't even make the starting line-up.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • PaekakboyzP Offline
    PaekakboyzP Offline
    Paekakboyz
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    Hoping home ground game goes our way. Don't have much else going for us, def need our forwards to all hit form to match that chiefs pack. BB v DMac will be fucking awesome though.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #12

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/105597608/Hurricanes-captain-Brad-Shields-declares-himself-fit-for-Fridays-quarterfinal

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ShadowTrooperS Offline
    ShadowTrooperS Offline
    ShadowTrooper
    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    I would love a Chiefs win

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    wrote on last edited by Winger
    #14

    Looking at these sides and recent form I don't believe the Canes have a hope of winning. The Canes forward pack is one of the worst they have put out esp in recent years. Individually all are OK but there are no impact or top level AB forwards to provide any punch or moments of brilliance. We are missing two AB hookers and Fidow and Savea who can provide some impact are both out. So its an unbalanced pack with two locks that don't work well together and two props that were ordinary in recent matches. The best the Canes can hope for from the forwards is to hold on throughout the match

    And Plumtree use to be able to work magic with these types of forward packs but recently this has gone. The backs have wonderful players but they are ineptly coached by a dreadful attack coach. Ive said before the only attacking plan is smash through with Laumape or kick up and under's and hope for the best.

    The only hope for the Canes is for the backs to totally ignore this limited game plan and throw the ball around. except when hard on defense. then clear the f+++ing ball. Not play around on the touch line. And hope luck (and a lot of it) is on their side

    canefanC ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to Winger on last edited by
    #15

    @winger said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

    Looking at these sides and recent form I don't believe the Canes have a hope of winning. The Canes forward pack is one of the worst they have put out esp in recent years. Individually all are OK but there are no impact or top level AB forwards to provide any punch or moments of brilliance. We are missing two AB hookers and Fidow and Savea who can provide some impact are both out. So its an unbalanced pack with two locks that don't work well together and two props that were ordinary in recent matches. The best the Canes can hope for from the forwards is to hold on throughout the match

    And Plumtree use to be able to work magic with these types of forward packs but recently this has gone. The backs have wonderful players but they are ineptly coached by a dreadful attack coach. Ive said before the only attacking plan is smash through with Laumape or kick up and under's and hope for the best.

    The only hope for the Canes is for the backs to totally ignore this limited game plan and throw the ball around. except when hard on defense. then clear the f+++ing ball. Not play around on the touch line. And hope luck (and a lot of it) is on their side

    Inciteful. We will lose the battle up front, don't have the razzle dazzle in the backs of previous years, and the Chiefs have some big guns coming back. I can't see the Canes winning this, sadly.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #16

    @canefan I think you have nailed it the Chiefs will win this, they seem to want it more looking from the outside

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Winger on last edited by
    #17

    @winger Canes capacity to clear the ball wont be helped with Skudder playing fullback. He has a limited long kicking game. He’s one of the better chip/grubber and chase guys going around but in terms of clearances he has rugby league-esque type range.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #18

    I may be relying on some TSF game commentary for this one. Have just checked into a decent hotel in Switzerland with strong wifi but Sky UK are pretty good at the whack-a-mole game of blocking VPN IP addresses. Have a few lined up and hopefully one works but if not I may be calling on here.

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #19

    @Winger @Chris @canefan look at all the Canes fans scrambling for underdog status.

    Face it guys it's yours to lose. 10 in a row. Most lethal backline in the comp.

    Imagine if you lost it from here ...

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #20

    The more relevant than '10 in a row' is lost last 4 out of 5, icluding against a weakened next-up opponent

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #21

    @booboo Haha mate I am a Crusaders fan just calling like I see it Chiefs to win

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #22

    Chiefs have firm claim to being underdogs..
    Don’t forget that the Canes ditched the Chiefs coach years ago.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #23

    @crucial said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

    Chiefs have firm claim to being underdogs..
    Don’t forget that the Canes ditched the Chiefs coach years ago.

    They did ditch him for the Hammetuer so it evens out a bit. But Canes are definitely favourites, home town advantage and they can't keep playing as shit as they have been so far. The Chiefs have played above themselves this year but the Canes should be a class above.

    KiwiMurphK Chester DrawsC 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #24

    @nepia said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

    @crucial said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

    Chiefs have firm claim to being underdogs..
    Don’t forget that the Canes ditched the Chiefs coach years ago.

    The Chiefs have played above themselves this year but the Canes should be a class above.

    Not in the forwards. On paper Chiefs forwards look stronger.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #25

    @kiwimurph said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

    @nepia said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

    @crucial said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

    Chiefs have firm claim to being underdogs..
    Don’t forget that the Canes ditched the Chiefs coach years ago.

    The Chiefs have played above themselves this year but the Canes should be a class above.

    Not in the forwards. On paper Chiefs forwards look stronger.

    Shhhhhhhhh.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester Draws
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #26

    @nepia said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

    @crucial said in Hurricanes v Chiefs:

    Chiefs have firm claim to being underdogs..
    Don’t forget that the Canes ditched the Chiefs coach years ago.

    They did ditch him for the Hammetuer so it evens out a bit. But Canes are definitely favourites, home town advantage and they can't keep playing as shit as they have been so far. The Chiefs have played above themselves this year but the Canes should be a class above.

    "Can't keep playing shit" is one of the more ludicrous reasons to think your team will win.

    My college team has been shit all year. The good money is that they will continue to be shit, at least till next season. Teams playing badly don't, as a whole, suddenly find their mojo.

    Unless you think the Hurricanes will go "how stupid of us. We should find our form now."It's It's probably under the bed.

    If the Hurricanes win, it'll be Barrett magic, rather than suddenly getting good again.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Chester Draws on last edited by
    #27

    @chester-draws I think you missed the point of my post (and my team is the other one - you clearly weren't here in the dark days of the endless Hammetuer thread?).

    Chester DrawsC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester Draws
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #28

    @nepia I caught some of the Hammeteur era, but I've been off the Fern more than on for the last 15 years.

    Still don't get it though.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Hurricanes v Chiefs
Rugby Matches
hurricaneschiefs
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.