• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksaustralia
1.2k Posts 84 Posters 233.4k Views
All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaio
    wrote on last edited by
    #526

    18!!!!!!!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #527

    Well the score blew out, but for the vast majority of that Test I'd say the better team wore canary yellow. With that team, playing like that, they could get a Grand Slam in Nov.

    NTAN broughieB 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #528

    @NTA said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

    @rotated said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

    Port Elizabeth 2011 is a good one to look at for your conspiracy theories.

    I'll give it a look. Pretty sure there are some YouTube clips labelled "WORLD RUGBY CONSPIRES AGAINST ALL BLACKS!" for around that time?

    Copyright Green and Gold? 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    wrote on last edited by
    #529

    Nobody covered themselves in glory after that, particularly Mr Owens.

    Weird how you can be so unsatisfied with a 27 point win. Didn't enjoy that at all.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • UncoU Offline
    UncoU Offline
    Unco
    wrote on last edited by
    #530

    Final score 37-10 to the good guys. Disappointing game, the forwards were rubbish for the first 50 odd minutes. All the subs seemed to make some great impact.

    Looking forward to Chieka whinging about one try being disallowed, even though they lost by 27 points (and would've lost by more if Barrett could kick worth a damn).

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #531

    Also I don't know what the TMO was thinking.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaio
    wrote on last edited by
    #532

    It's amazing how something as simple as a forward pass totally befuddles the entire rugby world every few test matches

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    wrote on last edited by
    #533

    Kearns claiming that the disallowed try destroyed the game. Dick head.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    dingo
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #534

    @Donsteppa said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

    @dingo said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

    @Donsteppa said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

    Imagine if we had... oh, I don't know... say someone like Aaron Smith in the match day 23.

    Why? So he could have been rag dolled on defense because his forwards were shit?

    You don't think he'd have been a handy bench option about now?

    My apologies. I thought you meant instead of TJP who I thought had being having a big match on defense just when it needed it..as a replacement, yes,agreed. A Smith running on would be awesome.

    DonsteppaD UncoU 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to dingo on last edited by
    #535

    @dingo said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

    @Donsteppa said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

    @dingo said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

    @Donsteppa said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

    Imagine if we had... oh, I don't know... say someone like Aaron Smith in the match day 23.

    Why? So he could have been rag dolled on defense because his forwards were shit?

    You don't think he'd have been a handy bench option about now?

    My apologies. I thought you meant instead of TJP who I thought had being having a big match on defense just when it needed it..as a replacement, yes,agreed. A Smith running on would be awesome.

    I was deliberately vague with my matchday 23 wording 🙂

    Was thinking he'd have been a handy option to run on at the time!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #536

    Well, there's my 38-point margin gone. Slackers.

    @antipodean said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

    Well the score blew out, but for the vast majority of that Test I'd say the better team wore canary yellow. With that team, playing like that, they could get a Grand Slam in Nov.

    The number of errors on attack gave the ABs every chance to counter, and our transition to defence wasn't good enough.

    Fortunately, not a lot of the NH teams we're facing have the same skillset that this AB team has. The number of offloads that just stuck when they needed them to is uncanny, and down (no doubt) to the sheer number of errors we made through passing too early or too slow... man... It is pretty to watch, when I can take my eyepatch off for the replays.

    @antipodean said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

    Also I don't know what the TMO was thinking.

    Actually, what burns me more at this point was Nige's reffing of the mauls. It was very harsh to start, and then just plain weird to finish.

    ABs had one come to ground, and before they even got it moving, he's calling them "ONCE!" which is weird, because they hadn't even had time to set.

    Then at the end, when the game was gone, he let the Wallabies stop at least three times before calling "ONCE!", and then gave us a ruck penalty we probably didn't deserve in the same couple of minutes.

    Was Coles MOTM?

    Thought we aimed up, and played the way anyone SHOULD play against the ABs: pound them in close. Our deftness out wide was pretty nice, though again a couple of those early/late offloads just don't stick for us because our speed of thought - probably down to fitness - just isn't there.

    It was good to at least see our pigs hammering home some good work. But we gave away a couple of tries with sloppy work out wide, and you're going to pay for that anywhere in NZ or against NZ.

    Cheika's presser is going to be interesting.

    1 Reply Last reply
    11
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by Rapido
    #537

    I enjoyed that.

    And then will move on to list the negatives .....

    Our defence was as soft as custard it seemed. Around the rucks especially.

    Worst ive seen our 2 locks play. BBBR especially ineffective in defence.

    Gods knows how that ends up a 27 point margin.

    Best I've seen Folau in ages.

    Niggly game again, midway first half Whitelock and TJP seemed too distracted by the niggle.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #538

    There was something about 18 and not losing to Oz at Eden Park since 1986 that made that first 60 minutes more excruciating than normal.

    After every game I make a resolution not to live post until the end of the game, and each week I'm dumb enough to forget...

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • UncoU Offline
    UncoU Offline
    Unco
    replied to dingo on last edited by
    #539

    @dingo said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

    @Donsteppa said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

    @dingo said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

    @Donsteppa said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

    Imagine if we had... oh, I don't know... say someone like Aaron Smith in the match day 23.

    Why? So he could have been rag dolled on defense because his forwards were shit?

    You don't think he'd have been a handy bench option about now?

    My apologies. I thought you meant instead of TJP who I thought had being having a big match on defense just when it needed it..as a replacement, yes,agreed. A Smith running on would be awesome.

    Eh, TJP's defence was good but I thought his clearance was pretty weak. He ended up throwing quite a few hospital passes that just put the backs under more pressure.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Rapido on last edited by
    #540

    @Rapido said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

    Our defence was as soft as custard it seemed. Around the rucks especially.

    I think that was down to three things:

    1. Phipps was passing off the ground a lot. Take out that step-and-a-half, and the line speed defence of the ABs wasn't quite as effective

    2. Our forwards did a lot more carrying in close. Inside ball from Foley especially was paying dividends.

    3. Quade and Foley as dual playmakers tends to leave you with 2 guys marshalling 4 runners in the previous games we played. Foley as the lone playmaker is 1 guy marshalling 5 runners. Our lines on attack were a lot better and held up the defence a bit as they had to think about which options they needed to call.

    That said, the silly little offloads and some great cover defence by TJP were the difference between us getting clean breaks, and us getting clear. Contrast that to our lack of pace in taking the ball carrier to deck, and the ABs getting offloads away off the deck or as they're going down.

    Skill level still a big chasm.

    SynicBastS Rancid SchnitzelR 2 Replies Last reply
    5
  • SynicBastS Offline
    SynicBastS Offline
    SynicBast
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #541

    @NTA said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

    @Rapido said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

    Our defence was as soft as custard it seemed. Around the rucks especially.

    I think that was down to three things:

    1. Phipps was passing off the ground a lot. Take out that step-and-a-half, and the line speed defence of the ABs wasn't quite as effective

    2. Our forwards did a lot more carrying in close. Inside ball from Foley especially was paying dividends.

    3. Quade and Foley as dual playmakers tends to leave you with 2 guys marshalling 4 runners in the previous games we played. Foley as the lone playmaker is 1 guy marshalling 5 runners. Our lines on attack were a lot better and held up the defence a bit as they had to think about which options they needed to call.

    That said, the silly little offloads and some great cover defence by TJP were the difference between us getting clean breaks, and us getting clear. Contrast that to our lack of pace in taking the ball carrier to deck, and the ABs getting offloads away off the deck or as they're going down.

    Skill level still a big chasm.

    The first two points were how the Argies smacked us around in that first game as well. Nicely spotted, Nick.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Godder
    wrote on last edited by
    #542

    That was looking close for a bit there, but then we took the cane out of the cupboard and gave them a damn good thrashing...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #543

    @NTA said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

    @Rapido said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

    Our defence was as soft as custard it seemed. Around the rucks especially.

    I think that was down to three things:

    1. Phipps was passing off the ground a lot. Take out that step-and-a-half, and the line speed defence of the ABs wasn't quite as effective

    2. Our forwards did a lot more carrying in close. Inside ball from Foley especially was paying dividends.

    3. Quade and Foley as dual playmakers tends to leave you with 2 guys marshalling 4 runners in the previous games we played. Foley as the lone playmaker is 1 guy marshalling 5 runners. Our lines on attack were a lot better and held up the defence a bit as they had to think about which options they needed to call.

    That said, the silly little offloads and some great cover defence by TJP were the difference between us getting clean breaks, and us getting clear. Contrast that to our lack of pace in taking the ball carrier to deck, and the ABs getting offloads away off the deck or as they're going down.

    Skill level still a big chasm.

    Reckon you would have smacked any other team with that performance Nick. The big guys made heaps of metres (including Moore), Phipps was accurate and Foley had an excellent game (he has to stay at 10. Fuck Cooper off). But your kingdom for a 12!

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    wrote on last edited by
    #544

    That should have been a try to Aussie. Dhp - his line could be a perfect run to the outside of the ball carrier. It's shit, it's a try.
    Matt Todd. Shit hot. Arguably best game by an AB 7 this year.
    Perenara - good player can't pass.
    Cruden always tries to get a bit too clever off the bench. Always a dumb chip kick or two.
    Crotty very good again.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #545

    Hansen saying Barrett "was a bit under the weather" as a reason why he was replaced.

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    0

All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.
Rugby Matches
allblacksaustralia
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.