• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

England to whitewash Australia

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
971 Posts 84 Posters 145.7k Views
England to whitewash Australia
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    profitius
    wrote on last edited by
    #327

    <p>Aus started like a train but somehow were losing after 30 min and you could see Englands confidence growing. Farrells kicking was the difference. </p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #328

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="SimonAdd" data-cid="586669" data-time="1465647543">
    <div>
    <p>Great post, agree with all of that Nick. England's defence looked stretched by the Aussie pace, we're just not used to playing against anything like it. A few more balls go to hand from Aus and they could still have won. Although I thought we looked more comfortable when Burrell went off; he's just not a smart defender.<br><br>
    Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Yeah that penalty against Arnold for obstruction was borderline I thought - Farrell was completely out of it, and Burrell would have had to shatter the laws of physics to get there.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>But these are the breaks.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Like the scrum - if Poite is the ref, you do this a couple of times:</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>[attachment=2034:cole.jpg]</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>And then completely change direction.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Props are smart. Refs are not.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #329

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="profitius" data-cid="586674" data-time="1465647959">
    <div>
    <p>Aus started like a train but somehow were losing after 30 min and you could see Englands confidence growing. Farrells kicking was the difference. </p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>We had something like 65% of possession and most of the territory in the first quarter. England just needed some ball.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>The lesson is: you can't win without it.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • pukunuiP Offline
    pukunuiP Offline
    pukunui
    wrote on last edited by
    #330

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Pot Hale" data-cid="586673" data-time="1465647847"><p>
    Not in the June series. Only the new maul Law applies. Everything else starts on July 1.</p></blockquote>
    <br>
    Didn't realise that.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #331

    <p>And while the penalty count was bad for us - discipline etc - the bigger factor is WHERE we gave those penalties away. In our half.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Whereas, from my earlier post: when we got into the red zone England were confident in their line speed and didn't attack the ruck. We were laser-focused on upsetting their ball, and doing that anywhere inside your 40 metres is going to result in issues.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    wrote on last edited by
    #332

    well done England and Catogrande!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #333

    Good test, 2 very different game plans. Given what I saw tonight i still expect Australia to win the series.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    SimonAdd
    wrote on last edited by
    #334

    It was the best game I've seen Cole play for a long time. I thought he had stagnated as a player and was just treading water until a younger guy put his hand up. But he was very good today; very smart, experienced scrummaging, got over the ball a couple of times like he used to and even carried to good effect once or twice.<br><br>
    Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #335

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="NTA" data-cid="586681" data-time="1465648437">
    <div>
    <p>And while the penalty count was bad for us - discipline etc - the bigger factor is WHERE we gave those penalties away. In our half.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Whereas, from my earlier post: when we got into the red zone England were confident in their line speed and didn't attack the ruck. We were laser-focused on upsetting their ball, and doing that anywhere inside your 40 metres is going to result in issues.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Yeah Nick, agree. I was a little surprised at how hard Hooper and Pocock for example went for the ball in those 50/50 situations whilst in the England half. It resulted in a rather expensive night with Farrell having a Johnny W-like performance</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #336

    <p>My team for next week wouldn't change too much - Kepu for Holmes, Horwill for Simmons (who I assume is injured).</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Maybe Lilo for Kerevi, depending on what Cheika wants.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Pocock and Horne's head knocks will need monitoring.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    wrote on last edited by
    #337

    <p>Very pleased with that - unsurprisingly. A win in Aus for us is rare and to put more points on them than the 2003 team is great too. However at no time did I feel comfortable until we got the turnover in the last minute. The try after that was just window dressing. Aus looked so bloody dangerous and every time Folau got the ball in anything that looked like space I was thinking about how to empty my colostomy bag.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>A big call from Mr Percentage to take of Burrell but our defensive pattern looked better straight away.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Nathan Grey remains a complete cock.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #338

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Catogrande" data-cid="586693" data-time="1465650036">
    <div>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Nathan Grey remains a complete cock.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>He should be banned from the sideline for a week for that effort.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    wrote on last edited by
    #339

    Just got back from game. Was one of the better ones I've seen at Suncorp. It seemed that Aus were killing them in the backs but that England were better in the forwards. England also played much much smarter rugby. The 2nd test should be a cracker.<br><br>
    Obviously I dislike the guy so take this with a grain of salt, but I was surprised at how little Pocock actually does. He spends a shit load of time hanging round the midfield running interference, but doesn't do much else. Obviously his principal skill is of massive value, but if he's stopped from pilfering he's a bit of a passenger.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #340

    <p>Interesting - Eddie front the presser by himself.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Mick Gold Coast QLDM Offline
    Mick Gold Coast QLDM Offline
    Mick Gold Coast QLD
    wrote on last edited by
    #341

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Rancid Schnitzel" data-cid="586697" data-time="1465650314">
    <div>
    <p>Just got back from game. Was one of the better ones I've seen at Suncorp. It seemed that Aus were killing them in the backs but that England were better in the forwards. England also played much much smarter rugby. The 2nd test should be a cracker.<br><br>
    Obviously I dislike the guy so take this with a grain of salt, but <strong>I was surprised at how little Pocock actually does</strong>. He spends a shit load of time hanging round the midfield running interference, but doesn't do much else. Obviously his principal skill is of massive value, but if he's stopped from pilfering he's a bit of a passenger.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:sans-serif;background-color:rgb(249,249,249);">I've long wondered why the greater impact on a game, all game long, of the likes of Schalk Burger, Thierry Dusatoir, the England loosies and Sir Richie has been so easily ignored when lovely Bono is the focus of discussion.</span></p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #342

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Chris B." data-cid="586696" data-time="1465650272"><p>He should be banned from the sideline for a week for that effort.</p></blockquote>
    Tough call who to cheer for if him and Brown come to blows. <br><br>
    Fardy was off his game huh, gave away a few pens just by being dumb, he's usually a bit smarter at the breakdown.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    SimonAdd
    wrote on last edited by
    #343

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Catogrande" data-cid="586693" data-time="1465650036"><p>Very pleased with that - unsurprisingly. A win in Aus for us is rare and to put more points on them than the 2003 team is great too. However at no time did I feel comfortable until we got the turnover in the last minute. The try after that was just window dressing. Aus looked so bloody dangerous and every time Folau got the ball in anything that looked like space I was thinking about how to empty my colostomy bag.<br><br>
    A big call from Mr Percentage to take of Burrell but our defensive pattern looked better straight away.<br><br>
    Nathan Grey remains a complete cock.</p></blockquote>
    Christ, do you think Burrell was yanked? I assumed he had a knock.<br><br>
    Agree that we were much better without him though.<br><br>
    Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #344

    The forwards really fronted for England. Was actually good to watch. Haskell's best game in white IMO. <br><br>
    There were as predicted, issues with the attack. Limited opportunities to put Yarde in space. But I did like that they tried to keep the ball alive more. Hopefully it is a sign of things to come under Steady. <br><br><br>
    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    wrote on last edited by
    #345

    <p>What an awesome game. Well done England, and all the Poms on here... ya jammy bastards!</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>It's going to be a great series. England bashed us up in the middle 40 minutes and dictated the pace of the game. It was great to watch.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>I'm confident we can level the series next week, just need to iron out a few kinks. We created more than enough scoring chances, just need to defend better (and smarter).</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #346

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Pot Hale" data-cid="586657" data-time="1465646299">
    <div>
    <p>39 points against Australia at home by a NH team.<br><br>
    Is that a first?</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>I think that is the most ever conceded by us at Suncorp/Lang Park. First time the Poms have ever won in Brisbane. Highest total the Poms have ever scored against us.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>So it would have to be close.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

England to whitewash Australia
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.