• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
1.6k Posts 96 Posters 134.8k Views
All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Joans Town JonesJ Offline
    Joans Town JonesJ Offline
    Joans Town Jones Banned
    replied to kiwiinmelb on last edited by
    #1511

    @kiwiinmelb difference is, back then they never got flogged by 30 points. And had a series of record losses prior.

    kiwiinmelbK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to antipodean on last edited by sparky
    #1512

    @antipodean “Until the ball is thrown in, and has touched the player or the ground, the offside line for players is the mark of touch.”

    So you can close the metre gap once the ball is thrown, but you risk being offside if you make contact another player beyond the line of touch.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #1513

    @Stargazer surely they have to have a look at them (blade boots) now? Given player safety it seems like an easy one.

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to kev on last edited by
    #1514

    @kev Yeah, especially because players also risk getting hit by a boot in the face/head. Imagine that being one of those boots. 😧

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #1515

    @sparky said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @antipodean “Until the ball is thrown in, and has touched the player or the ground, the offside line for players is the mark of touch.”

    So you can close the metre gap once the ball is thrown, but you risk being offside if you make contact another player beyond the line of touch.

    Yes. You can't cross it, hence throwing players over the line is penalised, but you can close the gap after the ball is thrown.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #1516

    @Stargazer said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @kev Yeah, especially because players also risk getting hit by a boot in the face/head. Imagine that being one of those boots. 😧

    calm yourselves guys, i bought my first pair of blades in like 2000, this is not some new and dangerous technology

    StargazerS boobooB K 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #1517

    @mariner4life Lomax might not agree with you about it not being dangerous.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #1518

    @antipodean said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @sparky said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @antipodean Look at 18:30 and 18:32.

    Can't be bothered continuing once someone identifies they don't know wtf they're talking about. The law is clear; you can close the gap after the ball is thrown.

    Perhaps that's something that needs to be looked at

    No closing of the gap until the ball passes the 5m line
    No closing of the gap until the ball is touched (by either team)

    Suggestions on a postcard to the usual address

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mikedogzM Online
    mikedogzM Online
    mikedogz
    wrote on last edited by
    #1519

    I remember having plastic sprigs on boots as a kid and having to file off the rough bits from walking on concrete.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #1520

    I can't recall the last time I had a ref inspect boots. I've had blades since forever and have never seen an injury like that. Perhaps refs should start again if they're worn into something akin to a flying keel.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #1521

    @Stargazer said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    Not sure whether this has been posted yet, but I found the bit about the studs and bench interesting.

    Lawrence Nolan  /  Aug 31, 2023  /  Loose Pass

    Loose Pass: Footwear choices, variations, TMO skills, unbroken ground

    Loose Pass: Footwear choices, variations, TMO skills, unbroken ground

    In his week's Loose Pass footwear choices, strategic variations, TMO skills and some unbroken ground as we head into the World Cup.

    Think it might be time to go back to subs for injuries only

    or at least enforce the 5-3 split

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to mikedogz on last edited by
    #1522

    @mikedogz and the ref running his hands over the studs to check for sharp edges.

    While Lomax's one is awful and seems nasty, it also would seem rather rare?

    DuluthD chimoausC 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    ploughboy
    wrote on last edited by
    #1523

    i think a counties player had a cut in the waikato game

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #1524

    @taniwharugby said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    While Lomax's one is awful and seems nasty, it also would seem rather rare?

    I think the B Barrett injury v the Reds was similar boots? It was another freakish one, a decent gash on his achilles through the socks

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #1525

    @Duluth ah thats right, maybe they have altered the configuration of the 'blades' recently?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    wrote on last edited by
    #1526

    I remember those blades were banned at schoolboy level in the early 90s in Aus. Boots were always checked properly before every game. Shit like this should not happen if they have the proper routines.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #1527

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @Stargazer said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @kev Yeah, especially because players also risk getting hit by a boot in the face/head. Imagine that being one of those boots. 😧

    calm yourselves guys, i bought my first pair of blades in like 2000, this is not some new and dangerous technology

    Would like to know exactly what these new blades are, and if they are different.

    Seems BB dodged a bullet early this year.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by Bones
    #1528

    @MiketheSnow said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    No closing of the gap until the ball is touched (by either team)

    I like the vision of the ball sitting perfectly in the middle and no team allowed to close the gap to touch it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    replied to Joans Town Jones on last edited by
    #1529

    @Joans-Town-Jones said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @kiwiinmelb difference is, back then they never got flogged by 30 points. And had a series of record losses prior.

    Yeah I get all that, none of us have been happy with all the records that have tumbled and the inconsistencies

    But this team and their chances for doing well at the cup itself, not so sure that game means that much.

    MachpantsM Joans Town JonesJ 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • MachpantsM Online
    MachpantsM Online
    Machpants
    replied to kiwiinmelb on last edited by
    #1530

    @kiwiinmelb said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @Joans-Town-Jones said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @kiwiinmelb difference is, back then they never got flogged by 30 points. And had a series of record losses prior.

    Yeah I get all that, none of us have been happy with all the records that have tumbled and the inconsistencies

    But this team and their chances for doing well at the cup itself, not so sure that game means that much.

    I think it does, it shows they crumble under pressure. If they get away to a great start, then they're good. Any real pressure and they're fucked. And they will get real pressure on at least one knock out game of three and will crumble and lose. Even the GOATs of '15 had that in the semi, and they turned the pressure around. '11 had the self induced pressure of the final. Funnily enough the B team pulled through under pressure vs Oz, but that is only Oz 😉

    Joans Town JonesJ taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
    2

All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham
Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.