• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Canterbury v Auckland

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
canterburyauckland
143 Posts 23 Posters 3.8k Views
Canterbury v Auckland
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by Stargazer
    #115

    I hope both players are okay. At least Bridge can walk off the field. Sad to see Jones being stretchered off.

    Fully deserved the red though. No malice, but a really bad/clumsy tackle.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    wrote on last edited by
    #116

    Well done Auckland to stop the lineout drive in its tracks

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #117

    @Chris said in Canterbury v Auckland:

    @Nepia said in Canterbury v Auckland:

    @Chris said in Canterbury v Auckland:

    @Stargazer said in Canterbury v Auckland:

    @Steven-Harris said in Canterbury v Auckland:

    To be honest its crap rule ..Tupaea is out of rugby for 3 months for getting cleaned out by a dog act and both these infractions are both YCs
    Everything thats wrong with rugby right there

    No, they weren't. That's why Swain got cited. He should have received a red card.

    Should have been a Red no matter what, you can not drop you knee onto a player's head.
    Dumb by Christie hanging on but a Dog act by Gibson.

    Did he actually drop it on his head, I know the Cantab cheerleaders commentators said he did but it didn't look like it hit the head to me (happy to concede the point if G&GR style pics and diagrams are used to show it did).

    Yep you can see Christie’s head bounced when he was hit.

    I've already told you the evidential requirements, G&GR it or it's not true. 😉

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    wrote on last edited by Winger
    #118

    Auckland backline attack looks a bit too flat. Too flat and lacks any variation doesn't it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #119

    Haha Vest.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    wrote on last edited by Winger
    #120

    38 - 20 FT

    Canterbury seem to find a lot of good 1st 5's

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by
    #121

    Just like every other Auckland match this year 30-40mins of good play. The rest full of soft penalties and errors

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #122

    @Duluth said in Canterbury v Auckland:

    Just like every other Auckland match this year 30-40mins of good play. The rest full of soft penalties and errors

    On the good side, Funakis kicking game is excellent. Was enjoying that.

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #123

    @Kirwan He has improved a lot, this year. Great to watch him play!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #124

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    ARHS
    wrote on last edited by
    #125

    Just watched this. Don't often get annoyed by the commentary but this one grated. The lass singing the praises of Niko Jones tackle and jackal technique when the replay showed how blatantly illegal it was...and was again moments later... The free pass for Tom Christie and his horribly cynical act. Players taken out well beyond the ruck. A head shot totally ignored. Forward passes left unnoticed. Mr Waenga should have been taken to task over all the non calls but wasn't.
    Some of the player skills were well below par too. Backline passing not good and Fihaki had another substandard performance. But the Cantab forwards made up for it. Harford looked very useful too. Funaki had his moments for Auckland. Moan over.

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to ARHS on last edited by
    #126

    @ARHS What was Christie's "horribly cynical act"? I must have missed it.

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #127

    @nzzp said in Canterbury v Auckland:

    We're going to get reamed.

    We are not playing well, unless there's a step change, it could get ugly out there. Frustrating year to watch these guys, there's talent, but not pointed in the right direction.

    Good prediction.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #128

    @Stargazer said in Canterbury v Auckland:

    @ARHS What was Christie's "horribly cynical act"? I must have missed it.

    It was bad rugby all around.

    Christie was lucky not to concede a penalty by continuing to hold on to a player away from the ruck. Would have resulted in a turnover of possession and a penalty conceded deep in own half.

    Gibson then stupidly lashed out and conceded both a penalty and a card.

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #129

    @KiwiMurph I wouldn't call continuing to hold on to someone's leg "horribly" cynical, especially if the retaliation was so much worse. Holding on to legs, arms, shirts for longer than is necessary, is very annoying and it happens way too often, and it should be penalised. Christie would have been penalised if Gibson hadn't responded by attempting to knee Christie in the head. Now that's what I call cynical. And potentially dangerous. He was lucky that his knee didn't connect with Christie's head, or he'd have received a red card.

    A KiwiMurphK 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #130

    Waenga had plenty of opportunity to say something to Christie, or blow his whistle earlier, but did neither. That contributed to what happened.

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #131

    @Bovidae said in Canterbury v Auckland:

    Waenga had plenty of opportunity to say something to Christie, or blow his whistle earlier, but did neither. That contributed to what happened.

    Yep, if players can't take the law into their own hands then the refs actually need to apply the laws.

    I wasn't swayed by Kane's ridiculous commentary, Gibson fell over because Christie was holding his leg and no knee got even close to head contact. It was a silly yellow card.

    Was maddening when the producer was clearly trying to correct Kane's dumb comments by showing clear space between the knee and the head, but he kept repeating it. And at any time Christie could have let go, but continued to cheat.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • O Offline
    O Offline
    Old Samurai Jack
    wrote on last edited by
    #132

    I like Kane as a commentator. Knowledgeable esp. about the dark arts (which is rare) and not biased IMO.
    In all the thread, has there been any mention of how well Garniner went? The lad looks to have a future!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    ARHS
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #133

    @Stargazer holding on solidly for that long and in that position away from the ball and in front of the referee just looked like a blatant attempt to get a retaliation, which is what I call overly cynical. Just like Hollywood dives. Watch the players taken out in the 20 minutes after that. It became a bit of an attempt to see how far the officials would go in ignoring it. Not sure if tmo can hear the commentary but it sure as hell would have left him feeling comfortable with all the flack directed at Gibson and Christie seemingly the victim.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • nzzpN Online
    nzzpN Online
    nzzp
    wrote on last edited by
    #134

    I'm disappointed but not surprised.

    Auckland has been hard watching this year, adn Canterbury seem to have found some good players and decent coaching. Surely the Auckland coaching team gets a refresh at the end of this season.

    KirwanK DuluthD 2 Replies Last reply
    0

Canterbury v Auckland
Rugby Matches
canterburyauckland
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.