Canterbury v Auckland
-
@KiwiMurph said in Canterbury v Auckland:
Ouch.
Hope Niko and George are ok
Agree. But a poor and dangerous tackle by Jones. Likely red card
-
@Chris said in Canterbury v Auckland:
@Nepia said in Canterbury v Auckland:
@Chris said in Canterbury v Auckland:
@Stargazer said in Canterbury v Auckland:
@Steven-Harris said in Canterbury v Auckland:
To be honest its crap rule ..Tupaea is out of rugby for 3 months for getting cleaned out by a dog act and both these infractions are both YCs
Everything thats wrong with rugby right thereNo, they weren't. That's why Swain got cited. He should have received a red card.
Should have been a Red no matter what, you can not drop you knee onto a player's head.
Dumb by Christie hanging on but a Dog act by Gibson.Did he actually drop it on his head, I know the
Cantab cheerleaderscommentators said he did but it didn't look like it hit the head to me (happy to concede the point if G&GR style pics and diagrams are used to show it did).Yep you can see Christie’s head bounced when he was hit.
I've already told you the evidential requirements, G&GR it or it's not true.
-
-
-
Just watched this. Don't often get annoyed by the commentary but this one grated. The lass singing the praises of Niko Jones tackle and jackal technique when the replay showed how blatantly illegal it was...and was again moments later... The free pass for Tom Christie and his horribly cynical act. Players taken out well beyond the ruck. A head shot totally ignored. Forward passes left unnoticed. Mr Waenga should have been taken to task over all the non calls but wasn't.
Some of the player skills were well below par too. Backline passing not good and Fihaki had another substandard performance. But the Cantab forwards made up for it. Harford looked very useful too. Funaki had his moments for Auckland. Moan over. -
-
@nzzp said in Canterbury v Auckland:
We're going to get reamed.
We are not playing well, unless there's a step change, it could get ugly out there. Frustrating year to watch these guys, there's talent, but not pointed in the right direction.
Good prediction.
-
@Stargazer said in Canterbury v Auckland:
@ARHS What was Christie's "horribly cynical act"? I must have missed it.
It was bad rugby all around.
Christie was lucky not to concede a penalty by continuing to hold on to a player away from the ruck. Would have resulted in a turnover of possession and a penalty conceded deep in own half.
Gibson then stupidly lashed out and conceded both a penalty and a card.
-
@KiwiMurph I wouldn't call continuing to hold on to someone's leg "horribly" cynical, especially if the retaliation was so much worse. Holding on to legs, arms, shirts for longer than is necessary, is very annoying and it happens way too often, and it should be penalised. Christie would have been penalised if Gibson hadn't responded by attempting to knee Christie in the head. Now that's what I call cynical. And potentially dangerous. He was lucky that his knee didn't connect with Christie's head, or he'd have received a red card.
