Foster, Robertson etc
-
@nostrildamus said in Foster:
Ok you are all probably right I am just still upset our worst coach in recent memory gets the best coaches to help him fall over the line.
Doesn't seem a merit-based decision to me.In hindsight, it does reveal how Steve Hansen must've been an extremely strong head coach in his own right to excel - even with some pretty mediocre assistants in Foster and McLeod as his only support staff between 2017-2019.
Foster now has Joe Schmidt, Jason Ryan, Andrew Strawbridge, Greg Feek, David Hill, plus Scott McLeod..
How many babysitters does one coach need?
-
@taniwharugby said in Foster:
so what happens if we lose the Bledisloe and then a couple on the EOYT?
āItās disappointing we didnāt play our best footy, and couldnāt replicate what we did at Ellis Parkā
š
-
@nostrildamus said in Foster:
Ok you are all probably right I am just still upset our worst coach in recent memory gets the best coaches to help him fall over the line.
Doesn't seem a merit-based decision to me.I don't know. If England comes up with a much larger offer then Razor could very well be lost. Contracts are easily broken these days. The time to secure him was now and they stuffed it up. Looks like player power won out in the end.
If Razor decides to go to England would be same as players going overseas, that is up to him. You don't give players a position in ABs to keep them in NZ or take on coaches (however much some of us want him) to keep him from going overseas.
Why has player power won, surely they have always been a huge part of any review,but not the only part? -
Summary from Stuff:
NZ Rugby CEO Mark Robinson said he still hoped Scott Robertson had a long future in the game in New Zealand.
He aid Robertson was "valued'' but turned the conversation back towards the decision to retain Foster.
"We have a huge regard for Razor as a key part of the coaching landscape in this country and and we hope he has a great future in the game here.
"But today's not really about Razor. Today's about Ian and his team into this new era."
Foster said he has no plans to change the All Blacks management staff. Business as usual, in other words.
Robertson has already made it clear he wants to coach a country at the 2027 World Cup. He could have a crack at the All Blacks job after the World Cup next year, or look to head offshore.
Robinson admitted NZ Rugby could have done some things better in recent weeks, but said it was time to move on and look ahead. -
@JC and he said 'if' there were any. Ffs. They've made the bed now though.
-
@antipodean said in Foster:
@nostrildamus said in Foster:
Well done NZR-how long before Scott Robertson is off overseas? I'm guessing an announcement by October.
Then fuck him. He knew years ago his next shot would be post '23.
I bet you wouldn't say that to his face you coward hiding behind a keyboard.
-
@nostrildamus said in Foster:
Ok you are all probably right I am just still upset our worst coach in recent memory gets the best coaches to help him fall over the line.
Doesn't seem a merit-based decision to me.I don't know. If England comes up with a much larger offer then Razor could very well be lost. Contracts are easily broken these days. The time to secure him was now and they stuffed it up. Looks like player power won out in the end.
If Razor decides to go to England would be same as players going overseas, that is up to him. You don't give players a position in ABs to keep them in NZ or take on coaches (however much some of us want him) to keep him from going overseas.
Why has player power won, surely they have always been a huge part of any review,but not the only part?The players weren't talked to before this review, sorry conversation. So so the posts on player power are a bit out of whack
-
Who were the realistic options to replace him?
A point I made earlier. Everyone seems to be assuming Robertson was overlooked at this time, but what if he was asked to replace Foster and declined? Hard to know without the facts.
As @Stargazer says, Robinson should be proactive and have the succession plan in place now.
Back to our scheduled vitriol towards NZR.
-
@antipodean said in Foster:
@nostrildamus said in Foster:
Well done NZR-how long before Scott Robertson is off overseas? I'm guessing an announcement by October.
Then fuck him. He knew years ago his next shot would be post '23.
I bet you wouldn't say that to his face you coward hiding behind a keyboard.
Hi Razors mum
-
@Paekakboyz I think they made their bed a while ago and everything Iāve heard itās been about buying time, riding it out and not really engaging with alternatives in any meaningful way.
It was really going to come down to whether Foster wanted to āspend more time with his familyā or stay on.
-
In hindsight, it does reveal how Steve Hansen must've been an extremely strong head coach in his own right to excel - even with some pretty mediocre assistants in Foster and McLeod as his only support staff between 2017-2019.
Hansen also had Mike Cron as scrum coach and Fox as a selector.
-
I just hope there is good communication with razor in regards to a succession plan to 23 , as long as that is happening, Iām happy with the changes that have been made with the assistants .
Letās get behind the team .
If Razor walks Iāll be pissed though .
-
@nostrildamus said in Foster:
Ok you are all probably right I am just still upset our worst coach in recent memory gets the best coaches to help him fall over the line.
Unfortunately.
There's plenty of coaching nous in the mix now between Ryan, Feek, Cron, Strawbridge and now Schmidt..
Fozzie will be the media fluffer and the boys' shoulder to cry on while the assistants create the master plans.
-
@Stargazer said in Foster:
So basically, we can only hope that Robertson takes over after the 2023 RWC, because it won't happen before then, regardsless of the results.
I'm pretty sure that plan has never changed. It has always been in the background that Razor takes over after Foster's contract. The only thing that has changed that it the run of results.
I very much doubt that Razor would want to come in now. He is a meticulous planner and doesn't strike me as a hired gun that will get the results overnight, especially if he doesn't get full say of management/assistants/squad etc.
Let's hope he hasn't been given other expectations. I think it is best for NZ, and for him, if he gets to take over in a clean way. -
Politics and Pragmatism
In retaining Foster and elevating Schmidt to a more strategic role, the NZR has made both a political arse-saving decision and a sensibly pragmatic one. Fundamentally, of course, this was always about fixing up a public relations mess of their own making.
And what a mess. Given the public uproar over the All Blacksā performances, It seemed almost certain a week ago that Foster was gone for all money. And I have little doubt that Robinson was on hand in South Africa to accept his āresignationā after the Ellis Park test.
But the ABsā beating the Boks against all the odds in game II mucked up the plan, leaving Robinson to convene that bizarre media conference in Johannesburg at which he said nothing of substance, while conveying what most of us have known all along - that the real villains in this saga are the NZR board themselves - an indecisive, directionless and poorly organised rabble whose original appointment of Foster in the face of better alternatives was both a poor choice and one they have been scrambling to make up for every since.
Like the AB performances themselves, at least up to Ellis Park, the NZR administration has been a shuffling, stumbling, conviction-less shambles. The right hand does not not appear to know what the left hand is doing, there is no boardroom game plan and no-one appears to be effectively in charge. So they have spared themselves further embarrassment with this 14-month workaround.
Thatās the politics. What about the pragmatism? Well, thatās the good part. There appear still to be enough adults in this over-crowded kitchen to stop the next 14 months being a complete disaster. Foster remains the titular head of the galley, though much of his original coaching hands have been turfed out of the kitchen and replaced with smarter rugby brains - Ryan and Schmidt - who should be able to bring together the available ingredients to as to serve up a more palatable outcome.
You would hope that now a firm decision has been made - well, at least the appearance of one - this will end the self-generated soap opera and get people focused back on the task at hand. That starts with the Pumas in Christchurch next week and then onto the Wallabies and the retention of the Bledisloe Cup.
As for Razor Robertson, he may feel a sense of relief, not having to be drafted in at the worst possible moment to fix a mess created by somebody else. This gives him clear air to take over the top job next year, should be still be interested. And it gives the players, who were clearly and rightfully sick of the whole charade, a sense of certainty and direction.
If the outcome is Foster being more consultative, more open to new ideas and less dogged in his selections and game plans, the changes will be an improvement. They certainly couldnāt make things any worse. Could they?
-
I would some respect Foster if he owned his original choice of assistants - that Impey & Robinson deemed 'superior' to Razor's.
But I simply cannot bear his self-serving ass, throws others under the bus to detract from his own performance responsibilities and then receives world-class assistants to paper over his glaring defecincies.
There are now 7 assistant coaches for Foster! (in either an advisory or full-time role) - Schmidt, Ryan, McLeod, Feek, Cron, Strawbridge, Hill,
What credit should he receive?
-
@nostrildamus said in Foster:
Ok you are all probably right I am just still upset our worst coach in recent memory gets the best coaches to help him fall over the line.
Doesn't seem a merit-based decision to me.I don't know. If England comes up with a much larger offer then Razor could very well be lost. Contracts are easily broken these days. The time to secure him was now and they stuffed it up. Looks like player power won out in the end.
If Razor decides to go to England would be same as players going overseas, that is up to him. You don't give players a position in ABs to keep them in NZ or take on coaches (however much some of us want him) to keep him from going overseas.
Why has player power won, surely they have always been a huge part of any review,but not the only part?Have we never capped a player to keep them?
