• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Super Rugby 2023

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.1k Posts 59 Posters 104.6k Views
Super Rugby 2023
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble Banned
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #306

    @Stargazer i have a horrible feeling thats exactly what theyre talking about but yes, i hope its not

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #307

    @Stargazer said in Super Rugby 2023:

    @Kiwiwomble It was clear from the start that McLennan's threats to leave the comp was just a load of hot air. Not surprised the comp will continue.

    This is interesting:

    The confirmation of the current Super Rugby Pacific format – with the eight-team finals format – will disappoint some fans and will be seen as a win for Australia, which has generally struggled with player depth.

    However, Marinos said there would be rule changes in Super Rugby Pacific to make the game more appealing.

    “RA and NZ Rugby are committed to the development of the most exciting form of rugby in the world, through trialling and implementing new rules, new ways of engaging fans and broadcast innovations with our partners,” he said in a statement.

    Hopefully, those rule changes do not include the same stupid "sin-bin power-play" rule that the RFU is proposing for the new Premiership and Championship Cup competition (or similar nonsense).

    I really hope it is not what they are alluding to,What a stupid idea that is.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #308

    Good news.

    I would think the new rules would be things like time off/time limits at scrumtime etc

    KiwiwombleK B 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble Banned
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #309

    at very least you would hope this kind of certainty will make sponsors happy and easier to find as well as new broadcast deal

    Dan54D 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #310

    @Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2023:

    at very least you would hope this kind of certainty will make sponsors happy and easier to find as well as new broadcast deal

    Thank god that's over. always thought it would sort itself out regardless of Hamish Mclennans yapping.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #311
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    wrote on last edited by
    #312

    I will say, that seems quite true about tv deal money split, only a very gullible person ever thought that that NZR was going to split their tv revenue, which included tests, NPC etc etc.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bayimports
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #313

    @KiwiMurph said in Super Rugby 2023:

    Good news.

    I would think the new rules would be things like time off/time limits at scrumtime etc

    That Im ok with, but I think most rules should fall in line with International rules as it looked liked we failed to adjust early in our AB campaign this year

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nzzpN Online
    nzzpN Online
    nzzp
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #314

    @Chris said in Super Rugby 2023:

    @Stargazer said in Super Rugby 2023:

    @Kiwiwomble It was clear from the start that McLennan's threats to leave the comp was just a load of hot air. Not surprised the comp will continue.

    This is interesting:

    The confirmation of the current Super Rugby Pacific format – with the eight-team finals format – will disappoint some fans and will be seen as a win for Australia, which has generally struggled with player depth.

    However, Marinos said there would be rule changes in Super Rugby Pacific to make the game more appealing.

    “RA and NZ Rugby are committed to the development of the most exciting form of rugby in the world, through trialling and implementing new rules, new ways of engaging fans and broadcast innovations with our partners,” he said in a statement.

    Hopefully, those rule changes do not include the same stupid "sin-bin power-play" rule that the RFU is proposing for the new Premiership and Championship Cup competition (or similar nonsense).

    I really hope it is not what they are alluding to,What a stupid idea that is.

    Good lord. That's marketing creatives personified, completely detached from the sport. Far out

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #315

    @nzzp said in Super Rugby 2023:

    @Chris said in Super Rugby 2023:

    @Stargazer said in Super Rugby 2023:

    @Kiwiwomble It was clear from the start that McLennan's threats to leave the comp was just a load of hot air. Not surprised the comp will continue.

    This is interesting:

    The confirmation of the current Super Rugby Pacific format – with the eight-team finals format – will disappoint some fans and will be seen as a win for Australia, which has generally struggled with player depth.

    However, Marinos said there would be rule changes in Super Rugby Pacific to make the game more appealing.

    “RA and NZ Rugby are committed to the development of the most exciting form of rugby in the world, through trialling and implementing new rules, new ways of engaging fans and broadcast innovations with our partners,” he said in a statement.

    Hopefully, those rule changes do not include the same stupid "sin-bin power-play" rule that the RFU is proposing for the new Premiership and Championship Cup competition (or similar nonsense).

    I really hope it is not what they are alluding to,What a stupid idea that is.

    Good lord. That's marketing creatives personified, completely detached from the sport. Far out

    yep bat shit crazy idea.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble Banned
    wrote on last edited by
    #316

    i'll say it now, i fully expect to see a "max zone", under the posts maybe, where tries are worth double

    ChrisC BonesB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #317

    @Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2023:

    i'll say it now, i fully expect to see a "max zone", under the posts maybe, where tries are worth double

    I hope not,I don't like this either.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #318

    @Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2023:

    i'll say it now, i fully expect to see a "max zone", under the posts maybe, where tries are worth double

    They could try reducing how long a team can be in possession and up the power play sin bin to two players. Also make a try worth one less point in the power play.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #319

    Found it.

    FB_IMG_1670002685056.jpg

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    9
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #320

    @Bones maybe asking to swap a player at half time would work too.

    I mean then teams could get real tactical and pick someone shit, then at halftime give him to the opposition.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    wrote on last edited by Dan54
    #321

    I knew if I came into this forum I would get innovative ideas that would see the forward for rugby!!!!😁 😁

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #322

    I reckon a 3 second rule. Ball must be played in the open after every 3 seconds.
    3 to complete a scrum, 3 to complete a ruck/tackle, 3 to complete a maul etc

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Online
    A Online
    ARHS
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #323

    @Crucial but is the ball safe to eat if you drop it on the floor for more than 3 seconds?

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #324

    Congratulations to our QBE North Harbour men who have stepped in to provide Super Rugby cover for the summer!

    Blues
    @jed_melvin
    @kadebanks
    @tamaraumcgahan

    Chiefs
    @wallacesititi

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #325

    I'd be interested to know who else is with the Chiefs as there are plenty of options at loose forward without having to look outside the area.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    1

Super Rugby 2023
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.