All Blacks vs Springboks I
-
@l_n_p Get ready for more triggering when I start pointing out some very good AB wingers that our newest guys are approaching or already gone past.
Against the newer guys is that they're probably playing less minutes per test than the older guys.
There was an article going into last weekend's test that said Will Jordan was scoring at a rate of one try every 27 minutes - which is 3 per test if he was playing the full match.
@No-Quarter Eat your heart out Cully!
(I'm pretty surprised that you didn't trigger Nepia's bat signal with the implication that Mitch might have done the right thing in axing a waning player after his knee injuries.....). There - that should brighten the skies of Gotham City! -
@frank said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:
@daffy-jaffy said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:
7 Albertus Smith, 6 Siyamthanda Kolisi
Kwagga Smith + Kolisi = Boks trying to speed the game up, or perhaps Mostert has just been shit at blindside.
Three backs on the bench.
Looks like they're reacting to the speed that we play at.
-
@chris-b said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:
@l_n_p Get ready for more triggering when I start pointing out some very good AB wingers that our newest guys are approaching or already gone past.
Against the newer guys is that they're probably playing less minutes per test than the older guys.
There was an article going into last weekend's test that said Will Jordan was scoring at a rate of one try every 27 minutes - which is 3 per test if he was playing the full match.
English WUM mode onThe problem is that all your
flashy fast-boys with their nice hairdosoutside back talent now aim to play anywhere else but wing, like 10/15 or 13, meaningbog-standard averageexcellent, reliable, hard-working wingerslike George Bridgehave to play there.Obviously there is a need in NZ to look at
raiding the South Seas Islands againinternal talent development channels for future stars at wing.
... Wing is never the problem area for the AB's.
Shag changing wingers for the RWC 2019 just seemed like he'd run out of ideas and was rolling the dice a bit.
-
@pakman said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:
@frank said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:
@daffy-jaffy said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:
7 Albertus Smith, 6 Siyamthanda Kolisi
Kwagga Smith + Kolisi = Boks trying to speed the game up, or perhaps Mostert has just been shit at blindside.
Siya isn’t up to speed, but not the done thing to bench him.
I think the game has already sped up worldwide from the new refereeing interpretations at the ruck.
My take, the Boks just found this out big-time with two losses to Australia and are having to adapt on the fly. 7 for the Boks is blindside too isn't it? Kwagga at blindside?? ... wow.
-
@chris-b said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:
@l_n_p Get ready for more triggering when I start pointing out some very good AB wingers that our newest guys are approaching or already gone past.
Against the newer guys is that they're probably playing less minutes per test than the older guys.
There was an article going into last weekend's test that said Will Jordan was scoring at a rate of one try every 27 minutes - which is 3 per test if he was playing the full match.
@No-Quarter Eat your heart out Cully!
(I'm pretty surprised that you didn't trigger Nepia's bat signal with the implication that Mitch might have done the right thing in axing a waning player after his knee injuries.....). There - that should brighten the skies of Gotham City!yeah, my comment earlier was definitely not an attempt to say the current wingers weren't good, they in general are world class by most standards
I think its just a different approach now days. Where as i feel previously we'd see more tries built on several smaller breaks joined together and so you needed a couple of finishes and several "creators"
now we see finishes looking to score from a long way out and from almost any situation and so several finishes works well
none of that probably made sense and was also probably wrong
-
@kiwiwomble said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:
yeah, my comment earlier was definitely not an attempt to say the current wingers weren't good, they in general are world class by most standards
No sorry, I can't let that pass. Rieko aside, they're good international class with future upside, no more.
World class for me means you'd make a world #1 23 or world #2 23 squad so six top wingers maximum.
Top six wings off the top of my head ... Anthony Watson, Louis Rees-Zammit, Rieko Ioane, Cheslin Kolbe, maybe Marika Koroibete, + 1 more (I would have said Jonny May a year ago).
Go on, give me your top 6 wings worldwide then ...
-
@l_n_p said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:
@kiwiwomble said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:
yeah, my comment earlier was definitely not an attempt to say the current wingers weren't good, they in general are world class by most standards
No sorry, I can't let that pass. Rieko aside, they're good international class with future upside, no more.
World class for me means you'd make a world #1 23 or world #2 23 squad so six top wingers maximum.
Top six wings off the top of my head ... Anthony Watson, Louis Rees-Zammit, Rieko Ioane, Cheslin Kolbe, maybe Marika Koroibete, + 1 more (I would have said Jonny May a year ago).
Go on, give me your top 6 wings worldwide then ...
thats semantics on how you use the term world class...so you could have let it pass
my post was a reply to the comment our current wingers are scoring at a fantastic rate, Marika Koroibete for example has scored 14 in 35 according to google, so less than ours, i think even bridge would probably comfortably be in the conversations for several international teams, just because we have very high expectations doesnt mean theyre not good on a more global scale
-
@kiwiwomble said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:
@l_n_p said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:
@kiwiwomble said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:
yeah, my comment earlier was definitely not an attempt to say the current wingers weren't good, they in general are world class by most standards
No sorry, I can't let that pass. Rieko aside, they're good international class with future upside, no more.
World class for me means you'd make a world #1 23 or world #2 23 squad so six top wingers maximum.
Top six wings off the top of my head ... Anthony Watson, Louis Rees-Zammit, Rieko Ioane, Cheslin Kolbe, maybe Marika Koroibete, + 1 more (I would have said Jonny May a year ago).
Go on, give me your top 6 wings worldwide then ...
thats semantics on how you use the term world class...so you could have let it pass
my post was a reply to the comment our current wingers are scoring at a fantastic rate, Marika Koroibete for example has scored 14 in 35 according to google, so less than ours, i think even bridge would probably comfortably be in the conversations for several international teams, just because we have very high expectations doesnt mean theyre not good on a more global scale
I know, I said sorry in advance ...
If you listen to Australian fans after any win, at least 50% of their side is world class
I'm harsh on how I view world-class but at least I define it, because the term gets thrown around like confetti.
Almost any AB who's good enough to get even 10-20 caps would probably start in at least half the top tier sides, that's pretty much a given for me at all times.
Does that make (say) Victor Vito or Steven Luatua or Adam Thompson world class? Not for me ...
-
@l_n_p said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:
@kiwiwomble said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:
@l_n_p said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:
@kiwiwomble said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:
yeah, my comment earlier was definitely not an attempt to say the current wingers weren't good, they in general are world class by most standards
No sorry, I can't let that pass. Rieko aside, they're good international class with future upside, no more.
World class for me means you'd make a world #1 23 or world #2 23 squad so six top wingers maximum.
Top six wings off the top of my head ... Anthony Watson, Louis Rees-Zammit, Rieko Ioane, Cheslin Kolbe, maybe Marika Koroibete, + 1 more (I would have said Jonny May a year ago).
Go on, give me your top 6 wings worldwide then ...
thats semantics on how you use the term world class...so you could have let it pass
my post was a reply to the comment our current wingers are scoring at a fantastic rate, Marika Koroibete for example has scored 14 in 35 according to google, so less than ours, i think even bridge would probably comfortably be in the conversations for several international teams, just because we have very high expectations doesnt mean theyre not good on a more global scale
I know, I said sorry in advance ...
If you listen to Australian fans after any win, at least 50% of their side is world class
I'm harsh on how I view world-class but at least I define it, because the term gets thrown around like confetti.
Almost any AB who's good enough to get even 10-20 caps would probably start in at least half the top tier sides, that's pretty much a given for me at all times.
Does that make (say) Victor Vito or Steven Luatua or Adam Thompson world class? Not for me ...
fair enough, im just the other side of the coin, we've been bless with several players that would walk into the GOAT category, i try not to judge the current guys too much just because theyre not stacking up to those GOATs
-
@kiwiwomble said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:
fair enough, im just the other side of the coin, we've been bless with several players that would walk into the GOAT category, i try not to judge the guys too much just because theyre not stacking up to those GOATs
I think we're aligned on how good a player even a ... relative to other ABs ... "average" AB is, in US corporate speak
Totally. In Europe, step back a bit and think how many goodish SR players (who were never even really close to AB selection) have carved out international careers. Wales, Ireland, Scotland especially. England less so, only Brad Shields for brief period comes to mind.
-
-
@l_n_p said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:
@kiwiwomble said in All Blacks vs Springboks I:
yeah, my comment earlier was definitely not an attempt to say the current wingers weren't good, they in general are world class by most standards
No sorry, I can't let that pass. Rieko aside, they're good international class with future upside, no more.
World class for me means you'd make a world #1 23 or world #2 23 squad so six top wingers maximum.
Top six wings off the top of my head ... Anthony Watson, Louis Rees-Zammit, Rieko Ioane, Cheslin Kolbe, maybe Marika Koroibete, + 1 more (I would have said Jonny May a year ago).
Go on, give me your top 6 wings worldwide then ...
Rees-Zammit is potential only and has less of a test match body of work than Jordan.
Watson is terrible and the Boks proved that demoattably.
Cheslin, Rieko and probably Josh Adams in the order
-
-
@bones I won't argue it ... pick your 6, I did say mine were "top of the head".
But my point was more that if you take a view that "world class" is really the cream of the crop internationally (which I do), I'm not sure currently a NZ winger makes it, apart from Rieko.
For clarity, I'd say Retallick, Whitelock, Smith are undoubtably world class. Probably BB, certainly he has been, and on form like Pumas 2 he is worldclass ...
Akira and Paps look like they have potential to be world class pretty soon.
-
@l_n_p i actually thought of a better way to word my thoughts, world class being those good enough to play on the world stage, ie international rugby
Those standing head and shoulders above other international players i would refer to as world beaters or something similar
-
@kiwiwomble We need formal rules on this, standardized across rugby forums and boards.
A citing panel for misuse of terms ...
The aussies will ask for exemptions so more of their players can be "world beaters" ...
