SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders
-
@toddy said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
Great win by the Chiefs. They look a better team without the AB captain.
That'sbait.gif
-
@hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@kiwimurph so hopefully it is done away with.
Problem is in last 5 then Barrett has nothing yo lose using it
Why? If the referee gives a shit penalty, why shouldn't it be challenged? Barrett had a go, as he is entitled to but the referees made the right decision.
My only concern with it there, was the chiefs wouldn't have been able to use their referral for a hit and hope against the saders that may have happened before the breakdown (e.g. the borderline obstruction by the player in front of the ball carrier).
-
What a comp though. Crusaders still the class above but the rest of the pack are just about there
I think the Aussies are going to get a fucking hiding in the comp that starts after this finishes. What are the calling the comp?
-
@bones yeah those blues did real well last night.
-
@hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@kiwimurph so hopefully it is done away with.
Problem is in last 5 then Barrett has nothing yo lose using it
Why? If the referee gives a shit penalty, why shouldn't it be challenged? Barrett had a go, as he is entitled to but the referees made the right decision.
Because that’s the game we have loved for decades. Sometimes you get a shitter of a decision but that’s rugby.
These referrals fucking suck. That chiefs one earlier was fucking dross. Kind of embarrassing
-
@hooroo said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@kiwimurph so hopefully it is done away with.
Problem is in last 5 then Barrett has nothing yo lose using it
Why? If the referee gives a shit penalty, why shouldn't it be challenged? Barrett had a go, as he is entitled to but the referees made the right decision.
Because that’s the game we have loved for decades. Sometimes you get a shitter of a decision but that’s rugby.
These referrals fucking suck. That chiefs one earlier was fucking dross. Kind of embarrassing
You mean the one where the referees missed a penalty? We don't except a wrong decision made leading up to a try, so why would we accept a wrong penalty decision deciding a game?
-
-
@mattasaurus said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@bones yeah those blues did real well last night.
Clearly second best team in the comp
-
@anonymous said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
Just realised the Crusaders jerseys say Cockram on them
No fucken way! With that logo too? You couldn't write this stuff....
Oh grow up.
-
-
@anonymous said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@bones But then I might cut myself shaving!
You're welcome.
-
@hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@hooroo said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@kiwimurph so hopefully it is done away with.
Problem is in last 5 then Barrett has nothing yo lose using it
Why? If the referee gives a shit penalty, why shouldn't it be challenged? Barrett had a go, as he is entitled to but the referees made the right decision.
Because that’s the game we have loved for decades. Sometimes you get a shitter of a decision but that’s rugby.
These referrals fucking suck. That chiefs one earlier was fucking dross. Kind of embarrassing
You mean the one where the referees missed a penalty? We don't except a wrong decision made leading up to a try, so why would we accept a wrong penalty decision deciding a game?
Because that’s rugby.
Glad to hear Aussie aren’t doing it.
On a side note, is JK growing a vagina under his chin???Dmac was sensational tonight.
-
@hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@hooroo said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@kiwimurph so hopefully it is done away with.
Problem is in last 5 then Barrett has nothing yo lose using it
Why? If the referee gives a shit penalty, why shouldn't it be challenged? Barrett had a go, as he is entitled to but the referees made the right decision.
Because that’s the game we have loved for decades. Sometimes you get a shitter of a decision but that’s rugby.
These referrals fucking suck. That chiefs one earlier was fucking dross. Kind of embarrassing
You mean the one where the referees missed a penalty? We don't except a wrong decision made leading up to a try, so why would we accept a wrong penalty decision deciding a game?
Waratahs, give us back our Super Rugby Title. Richie made a legal play and Joubert got it wrong!
-
@hooroo said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@hooroo said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@hydro11 said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@taniwharugby said in SRA round 8: Chiefs v Crusaders:
@kiwimurph so hopefully it is done away with.
Problem is in last 5 then Barrett has nothing yo lose using it
Why? If the referee gives a shit penalty, why shouldn't it be challenged? Barrett had a go, as he is entitled to but the referees made the right decision.
Because that’s the game we have loved for decades. Sometimes you get a shitter of a decision but that’s rugby.
These referrals fucking suck. That chiefs one earlier was fucking dross. Kind of embarrassing
You mean the one where the referees missed a penalty? We don't except a wrong decision made leading up to a try, so why would we accept a wrong penalty decision deciding a game?
Because that’s rugby.
Glad to hear Aussie aren’t doing it.
On a side note, is JK growing a vagina under his chin???Dmac was sensational tonight.
And it used to be rugby for clearly incorrect tries to be awarded and now both of us would be outraged if that happened.
