RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4)
-
@Magpie_in_aus said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):
Is that not obstruction when you roll the maul into no one?
Two Bok players rush in and join the side of the maul to drive. Last time I checked the laws any player that joins a maul needs to do so from the back.
-
@Rebound said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):
@Magpie_in_aus exactly should be a penalty to Japan
Think it’s still the original maul so no obstruction
-
How have they not worked out to throw to the front of the lineout?
-
@antipodean said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):
How have they not worked out to throw to the front of the lineout?
Should’ve gone long I reckon.
-
SA haven't shown much on attack, but they never do really. This has been a pretty dominant performance playing to their strengths. Just haven't let Japan play and their defense has been brutal. Has pretty much gone as expected in the end.
-
@Disgusted-of-TW said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):
@NTA said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):
@mariner4life said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):
He's on hands and knees, with at least 2 players hanging on to him. That's held.
Only need a hand on him to be held. He releases the ball: play on
Yeah, but.. I've seen plenty like this one let go too.
Like I said somewhere else: want consistency? Don't watch Rugby 😉
-
Straight in from the side and Barnes let’s him steal it.
-
Barnes is the ref version of Ireland. Good in off years but not cut out for playoffs.