RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4)
-
Is that not obstruction when you roll the maul into no one?
-
@Magpie_in_aus exactly should be a penalty to Japan
-
@ACT-Crusader said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):
Mauls are a blight on the game when players join in front of the ball carrier.
If only there was a law against that.
-
@Magpie_in_aus said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):
Is that not obstruction when you roll the maul into no one?
That's truck and trailer isn't it?
-
@Magpie_in_aus said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):
Is that not obstruction when you roll the maul into no one?
Two Bok players rush in and join the side of the maul to drive. Last time I checked the laws any player that joins a maul needs to do so from the back.
-
@Rebound said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):
@Magpie_in_aus exactly should be a penalty to Japan
Think it’s still the original maul so no obstruction
-
How have they not worked out to throw to the front of the lineout?
-
@antipodean said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):
How have they not worked out to throw to the front of the lineout?
Should’ve gone long I reckon.
-
SA haven't shown much on attack, but they never do really. This has been a pretty dominant performance playing to their strengths. Just haven't let Japan play and their defense has been brutal. Has pretty much gone as expected in the end.