• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Filling BBBR's enormous shoes.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
61 Posts 31 Posters 2.7k Views
Filling BBBR's enormous shoes.
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #40

    @Bones it’s not club footy bro 😉

    Surely if you’re in the squad, you can play when ever the coaches decide pick you...

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    wrote on last edited by
    #41

    Let’s be clear.

    It was a bad clearout, in from the side.

    But in synch with what was allowed during the game. Hence, it was fine.

    Retallick not been the same this year, so I’m not unduly bothered. If he’s out, so be it. It won’t be the losing of the WC, but significantly less likely to be the winning either.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to nzzp on last edited by Bovidae
    #42

    @nzzp said in Filling BBBR's enormous shoes.:

    DMac and BBBR are big losses for us at this cup. If we win from here, it's a 'thank god' moment, not an 'expected that' moment. Feels like the tales of 1991 (I wasn't following rugby at that stage in my life)

    Agree with the bolded part but I haven't given up hope BBBR will be available just yet. If the prognosis is he can be available for the playoff stages I'd still pick him, and select an extra lock to cover. It would be worth the risk given how important he is.

    I don't get the comparison to 1991, and you are not the only person to mention this. 2015 was more like 1991 in that many veterans (centurions) were holding on for another RWC cycle. Outside of Franks, Read and SBW you can't say it's the same. Perhaps more like 1999 where there was a desire to have the best players on the park irrespective of their best current position.

    H dogmeatD 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by NTA
    #43
    1. clearout was fine given the mess of that ruck

    2. Retallick shouldn't have had his hands in 😎

    3. walk it off, Princess...

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #44

    @MajorRage said in Filling BBBR's enormous shoes.:

    Let’s be clear.

    It was a bad clearout, in from the side.

    But in synch with what was allowed during the game. Hence, it was fine.

    Retallick not been the same this year, so I’m not unduly bothered. If he’s out, so be it. It won’t be the losing of the WC, but significantly less likely to be the winning either.

    I'm bothered, not cos BBBR is the hugely important piece he previously has been, but because SW, SB, and BBBR are an awesome locking trio for the squad. Don't need another with those 3, a loose forward who can cover for minnows. But now we have to put pat t instead, and he's a long way off the top three and not a great injection off the bench. Maybe hemopo instead, at least he's dynamic

    Victor MeldrewV 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #45

    @Bovidae said in Filling BBBR's enormous shoes.:

    @nzzp said in Filling BBBR's enormous shoes.:

    DMac and BBBR are big losses for us at this cup. If we win from here, it's a 'thank god' moment, not an 'expected that' moment. Feels like the tales of 1991 (I wasn't following rugby at that stage in my life)

    Agree with the bolded part but I haven't given up hope BBBR will be available just yet. If the prognosis is he can be available for the playoff stages I'd still pick him, and select an extra lock to cover. It would be worth the risk given how important he is.

    I don't get the comparison to 1991, and you are not the only person to mention this. 2015 was more like 1991 in that many veterans (centurions) were holding on for another RWC cycle. Outside of Franks, Read and SBW you can't say it's the same. Perhaps more like 1999 where there was a desire to have the best players on the park irrespective of their best current position.

    Agreed. It seems the problem right now is that our depth is not quite as strong and we haven't fully adapted to the new style of rugby.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to DaGrubster on last edited by
    #46

    @DaGrubster said in Filling BBBR's enormous shoes.:

    why is it 1995 all over gain?

    Was thinking of Zinny's injury in '95 (anda pparently Robin too - vastly underrated player)
    Zinzan Brooke damaged his Achilles tendon and was picked for the Cup but unable to play for a few weeks, and his younger brother Robin had a similar troublesome injury.

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/rugby-world-cup-2011/news/article.cfm?c_id=522&objectid=10745228

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • JCJ Offline
    JCJ Offline
    JC
    wrote on last edited by
    #47

    Looks like a contributing factor to the damage was for some reason one of the ABs on the ground (can’t see who) had his arm locked around BBBR’s right leg, so when Wun Wun grabbed his left leg Brodie could get his balance back.

    Aggressive cleanout, in from the side, made worse by friendly fire I reckon.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ToddyT Offline
    ToddyT Offline
    Toddy
    wrote on last edited by
    #48

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/114562769/all-blacks-v-south-africa-brodie-retallick-escapes-serious-injury

    Maybe like Read in 2011

    1 Reply Last reply
    10
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frank
    wrote on last edited by
    #49

    How tough is it to retain conditioning with a dislocated shoulder?

    nzzpN D 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Frank on last edited by
    #50

    @Frank said in Filling BBBR's enormous shoes.:

    How tough is it to retain conditioning with a dislocated shoulder?

    Loads of bike, and then probably running again in a few weeks.

    Dr. NZZP here to help 😃 Everything I know I learned from the internets

    sparkyS 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #51

    Delighted to learn that Guzzler will be available for the World Cup. 😀

    Take a bow the doctor who put his shoulder back in.

    Nothing wrong with the clearout. It is a big boys' game.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    replied to sparky on last edited by akan004
    #52

    @sparky Best possible prognosis but it doesn't mean it's a given that he will be fit. Still really positive news.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    wrote on last edited by
    #53

    To fill BBBRs shoes...I vote for the man himself.

    Reading that headline in Stuff was a great start to the day.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Gunner on last edited by
    #54

    @Gunner said in Filling BBBR's enormous shoes.:

    @Bones it’s not club footy bro 😉

    Surely if you’re in the squad, you can play when ever the coaches decide pick you...

    Well I dunno, I can't find the tournament rules anywhere.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    junior
    replied to Gunner on last edited by
    #55

    @Gunner said in Filling BBBR's enormous shoes.:

    It’ll be Barrett to start alongside Whitelock, unless of course they want to use Barrett at 6, (which I’m a fan of), in which case it should be Hemopo.

    I think BBBR's injury potentially puts paid to that experiment.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_
    wrote on last edited by
    #56

    I guess they'll play it by ear as even if the prognosis is good, that's still no guarantee he is going to fit for the first game.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    DaGrubster
    replied to Frank on last edited by
    #57

    @Frank

    quick look online says you could start some weights as early as 6 weeks after dislocation depending on severity.

    if he is available for the tournament then it may be best to leave him out of pool play to give him the chance of a proper conditioning window to get him right for top level rugby.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Victor MeldrewV Online
    Victor MeldrewV Online
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #58

    @Machpants said in Filling BBBR's enormous shoes.:

    But now we have to put pat t instead, and he's a long way off the top three and not a great injection off the bench. Maybe hemopo instead, at least he's dynamic

    I'm actually not too worried (less so now BBBR has a good chance to make RWC2019)

    There's been plenty of occasions where reserves or dirt-trackers have stepped up and played out of their skin when a key player is injured. We saw it recently with Ardie when SC was injured.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #59

    @Bovidae said in Filling BBBR's enormous shoes.:

    @nzzp said in Filling BBBR's enormous shoes.:

    DMac and BBBR are big losses for us at this cup. If we win from here, it's a 'thank god' moment, not an 'expected that' moment. Feels like the tales of 1991 (I wasn't following rugby at that stage in my life)

    Agree with the bolded part but I haven't given up hope BBBR will be available just yet. If the prognosis is he can be available for the playoff stages I'd still pick him, and select an extra lock to cover. It would be worth the risk given how important he is.

    I don't get the comparison to 1991, and you are not the only person to mention this. 2015 was more like 1991 in that many veterans (centurions) were holding on for another RWC cycle. Outside of Franks, Read and SBW you can't say it's the same. Perhaps more like 1999 where there was a desire to have the best players on the park irrespective of their best current position.

    I hadn't thought of a 91 comparison, but I guess if there is one it would be having dominated for a long time we came back to the pack and started to look very ordinary against teams we were expected to smash and struggled against the other contender(s)

    Fortunately we aren't about to sack the captain and saddle our coach with the most divisive figure in modern AB history

    Gutted about BBBR. Our most "irreplaceable" player for a good while.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Filling BBBR's enormous shoes.
Sports Talk
allblacks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.