• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Springboks V All Blacks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
842 Posts 75 Posters 56.4k Views
Springboks V All Blacks
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #788

    @chris-b said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    If DMac is going to be the bench option, does he also need to show that he's a credible international ten?

    I've re-worded your question for another way of looking at it

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #789

    I'm interested to see what they do in the Japan and Italy tests. Everyone expected Mo’unga to start in Nelson and also likely in Tokyo. I would have thought DMac was a chance to be the fullback vs Japan but that may have changed now with the group leaving early for England (could be JB that plays Japan now). It's likely one of DMac/RM won't be in Japan. I'd give each a start at 1st 5 over those 2 games for experience.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #790

    I really can't see why RM wouldn't be considered as fullback cover.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastie
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #791

    @mariner4life said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @westcoastie said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    I'd like to see more discussion about whether the issues lay more with Aaron Smith than Beaudy.
    I feel that when DC played, it was clear who was the on-field general tactics wise. Richie's team management is next level compared to Kieran Read.
    I think when we talk about AB leadership and driving the team, maybe we have too many chiefs at the moment. Aaron Smith did some dumb shit in that last test - I reckon if he got back to giving Beaudy the ball quicker and letting the 10 drive things we'd be better off.

    There is a certain amount of truth to this, A Smith was poor in the first 50 minutes of Saturday. He wasn't helped by some of the worst ball presentation i have seen from an AB side in recent years. But that doesn't excuse some of the decision making, and the inaccuracy of the kicking.

    But writing BB's issues off to the halfback is some serious whitewashing. A Smith wasn't at fault for the awful, awful kicking game; the stand and shovel passing game; or the distinct lack of run.

    Not all the poor kicking was down to BB though in this test, but A.Smtih wasn't without blame and there were plenty others guilty of rubbish kicking (definitely a collective effort) - South Africas kicks were far more contestable than ours, and we kicked sooo much away aimlessly.

    For a number of years, the forwards have been run by the 9, who then guns it to the 10 when he wants it.

    Happy to agree/concede that 2018 hasn't been a vintage year for BB (the Australian test aside). But maybe this is the issue, we've got a 9 trying to run things, a 10 trying to run things and probably Kieran Read trying to run things, with Ben Smith also providing input. So again Hansen putting on his leaders to drive things better, maybe all are just trying a bit too hard.

    Also, maybe its as simple as missing the work of the likes of Retallick and Squire (these two are probably our most key "outs"
    I don't think we're missing Dane Coles that much, Taylor was looking tired though and has had a big campaign thus far.
    Not sure we're missing any of the props deemed "first choice" either for that matter.

    I feel like Beaudy was at his absolute best in 2016, and I think his combination with Crotty was part of that. Its interesting that most first-fives other than Cruden have struggled with SBW outside of them...
    If Crotty is the key to unlocking Beaudy, and we all seem to think Goodhue is looking more and more likely the first choice 13 then theres a backline starting to form
    9 A.Smith
    10 BB
    11 Ioane
    12 Crotty
    13 Goodhue
    14 Naholo
    15 B.Smith

    Bench
    TJP
    Mo'unga
    SBW

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to westcoastie on last edited by
    #792

    @westcoastie that is a lot of words just to wind @mariner4life up.

    alt text

    westcoastieW 1 Reply Last reply
    9
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #793

    @act-crusader said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    Not that I’m pumping, fluffing, defending, but Sopoaga and Mo’unga are very different players.

    Richie - a bit of Cruden and a bit of King Carlos?!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastie
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #794

    @bones

    ooooooosh...

    I really like ALB, actually a bit disappointed the AB's didn't give Crotty & ALB the first shot as our centre pairing last season, I thought they complimented each other really well that first season they were paired together (2016?) and if anything - the AB's have looked stifled more often than not since then.
    I don't feel SBW has ever really set the rugby world on fire, except for 40min in a RWC final (yes hes done other great things)...it would actually be amazing if Ma'a Nonu could light up Super Rugby so much that hes irresistable for one last RWC...(unlikely I know)

    It does seem the Goodhue is potentially an AB great. He just has all the attributes doesn't he and just gets better and must be close to our first choice 13 now.

    What do the selectors see in SBW?
    Doesn't offer a lot on attack apart from the offload (apparently the AB's had just one collectively in the most recent test - that had to be a tactic right?)
    Defensively... well, apparently our 10-12-13 missed something like 10 tackles on the weekend.
    He doesn't have pace, he doesn't have dancing feet, Laumape is more of a wrecking ball, Crotty seems a better passer.
    SBW didn't trouble the Springboks with his physicality.
    Actually would've been interesting to see how Laumape might've gone on Saturday just been.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Rebound
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #795

    @mariner4life
    Leg break is a massive overreaction, the ball bounced in the direction it came from. if there was a leg break it would not have gone out so close to the tryline. I think its preety clear he didn't intentionally bounced it in the field first, but how took a calculated risk with a good chance to come off should he not get it out on the full

    RapidoR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Away
    A Away
    akan004
    wrote on last edited by akan004
    #796

    Massive whingefest happening on the sarugbymag facebook page. The usual complaints about the ABs being favoured by the ref etc and the Boks being robbed of victory.

    I felt the ref was pretty fair, he made some bad calls against both teams but no real howlers.

    ACT CrusaderA MajorRageM Billy WebbB 3 Replies Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to akan004 on last edited by
    #797

    @akan004 said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    Massive whingefest happening on the sarugbymag facebook page. The usual complaints about the ABs being favoured by the ref etc and the Boks being robbed of victory.

    I felt the ref was pretty fair, he made some bad calls against both teams but no real howlers.

    That stuff is music to my ears. Means we are back in the winners circle.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    replied to akan004 on last edited by
    #798

    @akan004 said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    Massive whingefest happening on the sarugbymag facebook page. The usual complaints about the ABs being favoured by the ref etc and the Boks being robbed of victory.

    I felt the ref was pretty fair, he made some bad calls against both teams but no real howlers.

    Really? Which calls were even contentious? The forward pass? Never saw a great angle of it honestly but it was more than offset by the awarding of the try that never was 5 mins after.

    A CrucialC canefanC 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by Crucial
    #799

    What's the story with Faf not being available for the whole EOYT?
    I get that the England game is timed before the international window (not that it seems to have affected England) but surely SA can call on him for international duty for the other games?

    RapidoR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Away
    A Away
    akan004
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by akan004
    #800

    @majorrage The forward pass and the last lineout throw which was apparently crooked. Didn't look that bad to me.

    Some are also whinging about the Boks not receiving a penalty in the lead up to the Barrett try when they had their guy latched onto the ball and the AB didn't release it. That looked 50/50 to me, I wasn't entirely convinced that the Bok player had his hands on the ball. TJ did a fantastic job of grabbing the ball before the ref had a chance to make a decision anyway.

    CrucialC No QuarterN 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by Crucial
    #801

    @majorrage said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @akan004 said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    Massive whingefest happening on the sarugbymag facebook page. The usual complaints about the ABs being favoured by the ref etc and the Boks being robbed of victory.

    I felt the ref was pretty fair, he made some bad calls against both teams but no real howlers.

    Really? Which calls were even contentious? The forward pass? Never saw a great angle of it honestly but it was more than offset by the awarding of the try that never was 5 mins after.

    All the Saffas at the pub were calling it a forward pass but I think more from hope than evidence. I doubt very much that the TMO would have had grounds to overturn that given the angles we saw.
    More a classic case of forward catch rather than forward pass.

    As for 'the try that never was', another hard one to judge. If you watch frame by frame there is one clear and legal attempt to plant the ball that is also clearly short at the moment of planting but as the cleanout comes over the top there is also a frame that shows the ball apparently grazing the line. Was this the same movement or a second go? Could easily argue that you can plant the ball down in one forward motion.

    It wasn't clear on either count (movement or touching line) but neither was it clear to negate the try.

    So yeah, a try each that could possibly be ruled out but neither were howlers.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #802

    0_1539087817910_Capture.JPG

    Contrasting responses to the final moments of the Pretoria test, from two members of the Sky TV (UK) comments team. Gold.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Away
    A Away
    akan004
    replied to canefan on last edited by akan004
    #803

    @canefan Fitzy looks like he is lifting an invisible Bledisloe Cup.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to akan004 on last edited by
    #804

    @akan004 said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @majorrage The forward pass and the last lineout throw which was apparently crooked. Didn't look that bad to me.

    Some are also whinging about the Boks not receiving a penalty in the lead up to the Barrett try when they had their guy latched onto the ball and the AB didn't release it. That looked 50/50 to me, I wasn't entirely convinced that the Bok player had his hands on the ball. TJ did a fantastic job of grabbing the ball before the ref had a chance to make a decision anyway.

    If TJ got the ball then it was released by whoever was holding it. If a Saffa had their hands on the ball they wouldn't have released it, therefore pretty hard to claim that they were hard done by.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to Crucial on last edited by canefan
    #805

    @crucial said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @akan004 said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @majorrage The forward pass and the last lineout throw which was apparently crooked. Didn't look that bad to me.

    Some are also whinging about the Boks not receiving a penalty in the lead up to the Barrett try when they had their guy latched onto the ball and the AB didn't release it. That looked 50/50 to me, I wasn't entirely convinced that the Bok player had his hands on the ball. TJ did a fantastic job of grabbing the ball before the ref had a chance to make a decision anyway.

    If TJ got the ball then it was released by whoever was holding it. If a Saffa had their hands on the ball they wouldn't have released it, therefore pretty hard to claim that they were hard done by.

    If it's the moment I'm thinking of the saffa was playing the ball on the ground, that's why he let go

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy Webb
    replied to akan004 on last edited by
    #806

    @akan004 said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    Massive whingefest happening on the sarugbymag facebook page. The usual complaints about the ABs being favoured by the ref etc and the Boks being robbed of victory.

    I felt the ref was pretty fair, he made some bad calls against both teams but no real howlers.

    I watched the game live on telly.
    I also put myself through the pain of watching it again on Sunday.
    On both occasions I didn't have any major gripe with the refereeing calls. Some go for you, some don't.
    If one had to be pedantic, probably the one call that was less than 50:50 was Kolbe's try.
    Delighted that it was given to us, but if I was in the TMO box I would not have given it.

    The rabid bok fan in me would've dished out a yellow card to the offside AB's in the first half after penalty no.5 in a row though.... 😉

    SmutsS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SmutsS Offline
    SmutsS Offline
    Smuts
    replied to Billy Webb on last edited by
    #807

    @billy-webb Gus was fine - reffed breakdown consistently and you don't get to bitch about skew lineouts if you don't really contest.

    I have no time for fans who whinge about calls instead of focusing on all the points the boks left on the table. Or their decision to try grind down almost 4 minutes from the middle of the park instead of pushing the ball into the corner and looking for more points from aggro defence and counterattack. It was working all game, got to dance with them that brung ya.

    On the other hand, now is a perfectly fine time to remember the single most infuriating call in the history of this great rivalry:

    KruseK nzzpN RapidoR 3 Replies Last reply
    0

Springboks V All Blacks
Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.