• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusadershurricanes
278 Posts 46 Posters 15.2k Views
Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #191

    @canefan said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    Good to see Dane Coles stringing a few words together as waterboy in the post game huddle

    He's one player we need fully fit and back as captain.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ShadowTrooperS Offline
    ShadowTrooperS Offline
    ShadowTrooper
    wrote on last edited by
    #192

    Looking at that effort from the Canes, the Chiefs were robbed. They would have at least given the Crusaders something to think about and a fight to the death. Most of that 2nd half was a half-hearted effort from the Canes.

    canefanC ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Winger on last edited by
    #193

    @winger said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    I hope the Canes can sort this slump out as I find watching them a bit boring now. Losing and exciting I don't mind too much. Losing and boring I do

    You need to recruit DMac then....

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #194

    @act-crusader said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    Taufua hasn’t been the same since they move him to 6.

    Fixed. He is clearly a better 8 than a 6.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #195

    I must say, after all the bullshit ref bagging going on in the NRL right now, it’s great to listen to a losing coach (of a semi final no less) being humble and accepting they were beaten by the better team and not looking for excuses or blaming the ref.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #196

    @stargazer said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @act-crusader said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    Taufua hasn’t been the same since they move him to 6.

    Fixed. He is clearly a better 8 than a 6.

    But the same level of effort just isn’t there regardless of the number of his jersey.

    Looks very laboured and is not carrying ball strong.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #197

    Much more disciplined effort by the Crusaders this week. Very few penalties allowing them to dominate possession - especially in the first half.

    Defence was excellent - apart from letting in that soft try at the end.

    Was that Siataga's first appearance for the Crusaders? On the plus side he gets about 90 seconds of play-off experience that he wasn't expecting. On the downside, he gets a broken arm.

    Thought Julian Savea had a good game to sign off for the Canes. Probably looked their most threatening back - perhaps along with Perenara, who was pretty good.

    Canes forwards stood up pretty well in most facets for most of the game - apart from the lineout.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to Winger on last edited by
    #198

    @winger said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @canefan said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    Good to see Dane Coles stringing a few words together as waterboy in the post game huddle

    He's one player we need fully fit and back as captain.

    Will be very important in Japan too. Remember how we did vs the Lions without Coles?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to ShadowTrooper on last edited by
    #199

    @shadowtrooper said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    Looking at that effort from the Canes, the Chiefs were robbed. They would have at least given the Crusaders something to think about and a fight to the death. Most of that 2nd half was a half-hearted effort from the Canes.

    Perhaps the Chiefs should have executed a little bit better last weekend.....

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to ShadowTrooper on last edited by
    #200

    @shadowtrooper said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    Looking at that effort from the Canes, the Chiefs were robbed. They would have at least given the Crusaders something to think about and a fight to the death. Most of that 2nd half was a half-hearted effort from the Canes.

    It’s that sort of logic that makes TSF World renowned.

    We would’ve fed off Weber and DMacs mistakes all night long.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #201

    @act-crusader
    👍

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #202

    So while previously I was running alongside and only occasionally jumping on the runningboard I'm now back fully on the Crusaders' bandwagon again.

    Always wanting the best result for the NZ teams I was supporting my Red and Black brethren tonight to ensure a NZ hosted final.

    Am now, as a former resident of North Canterbury and descendant of Cantab ancestors, discovering an ability to play the banjo that manifests only around Super Rugby play-off time.

    Go Saders.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #203

    @booboo said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    So while previously I was running alongside and only occasionally jumping on the runningboard I'm now back fully on the Crusaders' bandwagon again.

    Always wanting the best result for the NZ teams I was supporting my Red and Black brethren tonight to ensure a NZ hosted final.

    Am now, as a former resident of North Canterbury and descendant of Cantab ancestors, discovering an ability to play the banjo that manifests only around Super Rugby play-off time.

    Go Saders.

    I wouldn't look at that family tree too closely if I was you. The same names might repeat themselves in different places

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #204

    @hydro11 said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    Maybe you lose a game 12-6 with D Mac playing but more often the score isn't going to be close like that when he is out there

    Probably something like 31-32...

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ShadowTrooperS Offline
    ShadowTrooperS Offline
    ShadowTrooper
    wrote on last edited by
    #205

    Never said the Canes didn't deserve to be there, cos they did - just wish the conference system wasn't rigged and the NZ sides should have been in different sides of the draw

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • PaekakboyzP Offline
    PaekakboyzP Offline
    Paekakboyz
    wrote on last edited by
    #206

    Well done crusaders. Far to good for us. Held us out whenever we got some momentum or a sniff of a chance. Then applied constant pressure and converted that into points.

    Team effort for sure but richie m stood out. He had a great game and made the most of the platform laid up front. For our guys jules and gareth Evans led the effort and energy stats. TJ had a few good moments.

    Stink it wasn't a tighter contest, but suspect it'll still be closer than the final!! 😁 gooood the saders!!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to pukunui on last edited by
    #207

    @pukunui said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    Two things.

    1. Has a deliberate knock down really jumped from a penalty to an automatic yellow card as the commentators seem to keep suggesting? Or are they talking shit again. Either way im sick of these things. Turning me off the game big time.

    This is what the lawyer, who defends cited players before the WR and SANZAAR judiciary has to say about that:

    pukunuiP 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #208

    @pukunui @Stargazer were they conflating how it works in 7s?

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #209

    @booboo Hmmm, not sure. Don't think this rule is different in 7s.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #210

    Can't remember whether I already posted this.

    H 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF
Rugby Matches
crusadershurricanes
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.