• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Blues v Hurricanes

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
blueshurricanes
299 Posts 43 Posters 25.6k Views
Blues v Hurricanes
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #253

    Ferald reports "massive brawl" at Eden Park, stating that a fight between two fans escalated into a wider melee. Which is odd as I thought I would have noticed that.

    Further down the page their source is quoted as saying a fight broke out between two fans, loads of people stepped in to break it up, and it was over pretty quickly.

    Massive brawl... wider melee... nice one Ferald.

    http://nzh.tw/11839198

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #254

    @KiwiMurph yeah definitely think he needs game time, and also reckon he will thrive from it, this is a kid who turned down NPC and Super contracts because he didnt feel he was ready.

    How far away is Nock, seems made of glass, bit of a worry for such a young fella

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to jegga on last edited by
    #255

    @jegga said in Blues v Hurricanes:

    Also Mark Abbot is very similar sounding to Mark Hammett, I was triggered throughout.

    I'm glad I'm not the only one who felt that way ... I swear the commentators were doing it on purpose.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    wrote on last edited by
    #256

    been thinking about BB ,

    And I think what makes him so special ,is not necessarily that he is better , jury still out there ,

    but more how different he is to previous 10s , has the most dynamic fastest player on the field at international level had 10 on his back before ?

    Just like Zinny revolutionized the 8 position, Cully at FB, Jonah on the wing etc

    We could be witnessing something similar and special with Beauden as a five eighth , he is like nothing that has come before

    Chester DrawsC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester Draws
    replied to kiwiinmelb on last edited by Chester Draws
    #257

    @kiwiinmelb said in Blues v Hurricanes:

    been thinking about BB ,

    And I think what makes him so special ,is not necessarily that he is better , jury still out there ,

    but more how different he is to previous 10s , has the most dynamic fastest player on the field at international level had 10 on his back before ?

    Just like Zinny revolutionized the 8 position, Cully at FB, Jonah on the wing etc

    We could be witnessing something similar and special with Beauden as a five eighth , he is like nothing that has come before

    But unless you have his speed, you can't play like him. [edit] Jonah didn't particularly revolutionise wing play -- how do the current wingers differ from those before Jonah? [/edit]

    What should change is how BB is marked. Most teams these days only allow the outside channel and drift across on defence -- which is how BB must not be marked. He needs to be forced back in every time. The Chiefs didn't give him outside space, and kept him quiet, except when they kicked deep to him without a decent chase, whereupon he (and Jordy) carved them up on counter-attack.

    taniwharugbyT kiwiinmelbK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Chester Draws on last edited by
    #258

    @Chester-Draws thing is, you can only mark him so far, those weaving runs last night, the chip behind the defence, even if you are up in his face, he still manages it, and then the fact you are focussing on him (ala everyone on Jonah allowing the equally but differently dangerous Goldie & Cully extra time and space) you are going to leave a half gap for someone else to exploit

    Chester DrawsC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #259

    The Chiefs also had the benefit of torrential rain to help keep him quiet. On a dry pitch he's very difficult to contain without leaving space out wide.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    wrote on last edited by
    #260

    And the commentators highlighted how skilful his deception with his hands was too.

    He was carving my team up and I could only laugh and admire the skill and pace.

    MilkM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester Draws
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #261

    @taniwharugby You can't really completely hold down great players, but you can minimise them.

    With BB it's much worse if you allow him the outside gap because you risk letting him clear through in space. Using a game plan of pushing in is still using the same amount of men to mark him -- I don't think double marking him is particularly helpful at all.

    I'm not convinced the rain had anything to do with Barrett being quiet in Hamilton. The rain doesn't stop him running, and the field was firm. Usually in the rain you will kick more, so he'd get the ball more in space when he dropped back (and that is what happened at the start of the second half when the Chiefs forgot the game plan for a while).

    Given that Barrett was the difference between the two sides last night, a plan aimed at minimising his effectiveness would seem wise. Just going on doing the same things and hoping things will change seems a trifle unwise.

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    replied to Chester Draws on last edited by
    #262

    @Chester-Draws wingers before Jonah were generally much smaller quick blokes .

    You could argue Kirwan , then inga were first I guess.
    But Jonah was the first real beast I can think of

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Chester Draws on last edited by
    #263

    @Chester-Draws said in Blues v Hurricanes:

    @taniwharugby You can't really completely hold down great players, but you can minimise them.

    With BB it's much worse if you allow him the outside gap because you risk letting him clear through in space. Using a game plan of pushing in is still using the same amount of men to mark him -- I don't think double marking him is particularly helpful at all.

    I'm not convinced the rain had anything to do with Barrett being quiet in Hamilton. The rain doesn't stop him running, and the field was firm. Usually in the rain you will kick more, so he'd get the ball more in space when he dropped back (and that is what happened at the start of the second half when the Chiefs forgot the game plan for a while).

    Given that Barrett was the difference between the two sides last night, a plan aimed at minimising his effectiveness would seem wise. Just going on doing the same things and hoping things will change seems a trifle unwise.

    That might of worked for one of his breaks last night, but he also pounced on a loose ball from a lineout, chip kicked us, and ran it back from deep several times.

    He was a bloody nightmare.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to kiwiinmelb on last edited by
    #264

    @kiwiinmelb said in Blues v Hurricanes:

    You could argue Kirwan , then inga were first I guess.
    But Jonah was the first real beast I can think of

    BG was a bit of a beast but it's all relative if he was compared to Terry Wright for example.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    wrote on last edited by
    #265

    The thing with BB is that he is a ridiculous combination of qualities that most 10s have some but not all of. For starters he's a big strong bugger, certainly bigger than most 10s. But not only that he has the pace to skin most wingers. And that's even before you factor in the insane skill set, i.e his awareness, passing, kicking game (particularly the chip), etc etc. We're now seeing the sum of all those parts and the result is pretty amazing. Pity his goal kicking is dodgy, but hopefully that was a glitch.

    What is great to see is how he's now coming into his own and putting all the knockers in their place. And there were plenty of them even during last season. But us long suffering Canes fans knew better 🙂

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #266

    @Rancid-Schnitzel care to point out who was knocking him or at least how?

    KirwanK Rancid SchnitzelR 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #267

    @Bones said in Blues v Hurricanes:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel care to point out who was knocking him or at least how?

    Mostly Chiefs/Crudan fans that kept saying BB was an impact sub, couldn't control a game had issues on defence and was a poor goal kicker.

    Bit of truth in all of that, but he has improved in all areas except goalkicking.

    Remember some people posting that he's really a fullback, not a ten.

    NepiaN boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    7
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #268

    @Bones said in Blues v Hurricanes:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel care to point out who was knocking him or at least how?

    Sure, I'll fax you a list.

    Billy TellB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #269

    @Kirwan Most of that was valid criticism pre the Wales test series - but those starts saw him rise and then he went bonkers.

    I don't even think uber fans such as Rancid would consider he was ever at the level he got to then and now prior to that.

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #270

    @Nepia said in Blues v Hurricanes:

    @Kirwan Most of that was valid criticism pre the Wales test series - but those starts saw him rise and then he went bonkers.

    I don't even think uber fans such as Rancid would consider he was ever at the level he got to then and now prior to that.

    Actually I think he was heading in that direction before he was injured in 2015. At any rate, I never said he should be selected ahead of Carter or even Cruden at the start of last season. The point is that to me it was obvious and only a matter of time before he became the starting 10 and a superstar. There were plenty who doubted that he was any more than a supersub and possibly not even a decent 10.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by
    #271

    @Rancid-Schnitzel I completely doubted it watching him put in average games at 10 for the Canes early on and yep I thought he'd play out his career as a supersub - but I've been happily proven wrong. We'll have to credit your nostradamus abilities on this one.

    My biggest worry was that he wouldn't carry that form over this year but he's done that too.

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #272

    @Snowy TJ Peranara is a beast compared to Terry Wright 🙂

    jeggaJ 1 Reply Last reply
    2

Blues v Hurricanes
Rugby Matches
blueshurricanes
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.