• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks vs Argentina I

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksargentina
1.4k Posts 88 Posters 39.2k Views
All Blacks vs Argentina I
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • BerniesCornerB Offline
    BerniesCornerB Offline
    BerniesCorner
    wrote on last edited by
    #1336

    I'm disappointed as anyone on here but some of the gossip and speculation in this thread is bs.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by
    #1337

    I still haven't watched the game, but from looking at the stats, Paps seemed to have a very non-like-him game - I know he was subbed at 65 minutes, but he was well last in tackles for the loosies. It looks to me (from only looking at the stats), that we have two very similar 7s out there. Blackadder leads for tackles (by some distance) with stats that look very Sam Cane like (lots of tackles, lots of carries, not many metres) except for the three penalties.

    It looks like all the running came from Ardie - according to ESPN he had 19 carries for 51 metres, and it looks like that is about the same as every other forward combined. I don't see why they picked supposed 'running' props but haven't used them. Williams (at least) is ready for the next step, let's go, we need more ball carrying.

    WTF happened to Sititi? Stats say he was penalized 3 times in 15 minutes? Fucking ouch. I wonder if throwing a totally green kid into a game with 15 left when we are in shit is quite the method of bringing him along?

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by pakman
    #1338

    Third quarter rewatch.

    Tighties again good in lineouts and all but one maul. Both starting pack and replacement props generated some go forward. In particular, four or five pick 'n goes generated big metres before Telea try.

    Three penalties which had a large element of luck generated all of Puma's 13 points in period.

    First, Darry on the carry is tackled. The cleaner, Lomax, was delayed avoiding a previous tackler still on the ground. Darry's tackler was slow to roll, but made just enough effort to avoid Gardner penalising, and lets Matera in. Another day the clean is made or tackler caught not rolling away;
    Second, the Niggles penalty for being bumped off by Pumas prop;
    Third, Paps makes excellent covering tackle, but falls awkwardly and unable to roll away. Very similar to first of the penalties above but didn't go our way.

    Pumas deserve tremendous plaudits for their extraordinary skill in coverting three marginal penalties way out from our line into 13 points!!

    Quite apart from the excellent goal kicks, Carreras also set up the maul try by landing the penalty punt 5m from AB goal line. An unconventional maul, which ABs clearly hadn't contemplated, and Pumas overloaded the gap between Lomax and Darry, who was defending the dummy jump by Puma 8.
    13/13

    Ratima on at 56:30 and Ofa/Newell at 58.30. Immediaely DMac getting ball wider and quicker.
    Also, at this juncture the forward pod 'screening' DMac starts to rumble and make short offloads, which worked well.

    Bad DMac missed penalty at 58:30.

    At 59:30 classic Jordan break one out from ruck, and ABs right on Puma line before being called back for Ratima kick, which Gardner adjudged a knock on 'becuase he wasn't in control when his leg connected' [is that a Law?].

    In summary, ABs had the better of about 15 of the 20 minutes, but the three penalties awarded to Pumas left the scoring 10-13 to Pumas.

    BonesB WingerW 2 Replies Last reply
    5
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #1339

    @pakman I can't find anything on needing to be in control of the ball to make a kick. But then again I can't find anything on what constitutes a lick either (looked to me like it glanced off just above the knee before the foot and I thought a kick was from below the knee).

    P WingerW 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #1340

    @Bones I'm pretty sure the knee or shin is a legal kick.

    From first principles I thought propelling the ball forward, other than by a kick, only became a knock on if the ball touched something else, being the ground, another player, the posts or even the ref.

    So if you, for example, caught the ball before it touched anything else it wasn't a knock on.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #1341

    @pakman on the former, I recall it coming up when Los did his off the knee chip and it got clarified after.

    The latter, that was my understanding as well, don't recall anything about control, just the ball travelling forward and hitting something other than you before you can regain.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote on last edited by sparky
    #1342

    I agree with the thrust of what Chris Jones was saying here. What was remarkable about the first Test was the fragility of the All Blacks and seeing players with many Test caps get so badly wrong what should be basic skills for professional rugby players to execute. Slapdash.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #1343

    @pakman said in All Blacks vs Argentina I:

    which Gardner adjudged a knock on 'becuase he wasn't in control when his leg connected' [is that a Law?].

    My understanding it is

    Players can't drop a ball (knock forward) and kick it and claim it was a kick. He must be in control of the ball before the kick

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #1344

    @Bones said in All Blacks vs Argentina I:

    @pakman I can't find anything on needing to be in control of the ball to make a kick. But then again I can't find anything on what constitutes a lick either (looked to me like it glanced off just above the knee before the foot and I thought a kick was from below the knee).

    But the lost forward can't be cancelled out by kicking it. I think it can if you catch it though. But this is based on the refs rulings only

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • nzzpN Online
    nzzpN Online
    nzzp
    wrote on last edited by
    #1345

    @Winger has it correct as I understand it. They clarified after someone lost the ball and got a toe to it - you have to be intentional to kick the ball

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • M Online
    M Online
    Mr Fish
    wrote on last edited by Mr Fish
    #1346

    By definition, if you lose the ball forward, you actually need to catch it before doing anything else. ("When a player loses possession of the ball and it goes forward, or when a player hits the ball forward with the hand or arm, or when the ball hits the hand or arm and goes forward, and the ball touches the ground or another player before the original player can catch it.")

    So in this instance, Ratima loses the ball forward and because he doesn't catch it before kicking it, it's a knock on.

    You don't see it always ruled correctly but the same thing applies if a player loses the ball forward then manages to bat it backwards before it hits the ground - by the letter of the law, that's still a knock on, even if it's ultimately hit the ground behind where it was batted back from.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    wrote on last edited by
    #1347

    Yes I thought the ref was clear on how he lost control so could not kick it without regathering first.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by
    #1348

    Some people get confused because league has a different knock on law. They don't call a knock on if you kick it before it touches the ground

    KiwiwombleK NepiaN 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #1349

    @Duluth i'll put my hand up, i thought you could kick it

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by canefan
    #1350

    Just watching Aotearoa rugby pod. Apparently our percentage of collisions won and our contestable kicks recovered did not make good reading.

    We are too small to make the gain line

    Crazy HorseC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by pakman
    #1351

    Rewatch 60 -70

    Two scrums consume two of first five minutes! We go forward in the first but Ofa's side collapses. Pumas bluff at second and earn free kick as ABs go early.

    In between, ball ripped from Kremer on their 22, several forward rumbles (Newell makes 4m) although always from standing starts, and Jordan comes in one out again and but for forward pass DMac was over by sticks.

    At 65, Aumua,Sititi and Ioane on. Two very good kicks from DMac in back field, one a metre away from 50:22.

    From lineout Niggles penalised (late - touchie?) for interfering with Puma jumper's arm on way down. IN FACT replay shows clearly his band on the ball. Gardner error.

    At 67 he redeems himself by stealing Puma ball in lineout. RD brain fart leads to 5m scrum.

    For scrum at 68, Puma TH bores in at 45 degrees and goes forward. Angus on other side, but looked a penalty for ABs on replay. EB misses textbook tackle on breaking 8, and try scored.

    Another seven Puma points originating from dubious penalty, this time in their half.

    ABs actually had much the better of period but scoreboard 0 -7.

    Niggles the Bad (dubious!), the Good and the Ugly.

    BonesB P 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #1352

    @pakman said in All Blacks vs Argentina I:

    From lineout Niggles penalised (late - touchie?) for interfering with Puma jumper's arm on way down. IN FACT replay shows clearly his band on the ball. Gardner error.

    Didn't the puma catch it, so it would be interfering with the jumper still?

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #1353

    @Bones The call was grabbing jumper's arm. He didn't.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #1354

    @pakman said in All Blacks vs Argentina I:

    @Bones The call was grabbing jumper's arm. He didn't.

    Still interfering with the jumper.

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to pakman on last edited by pakman
    #1355

    @pakman said in All Blacks vs Argentina I:

    Rewatch 60 -70

    Two scrums consume two of first five minutes! We go forward in the first but Ofa's side collapses. Pumas bluff at second and earn free kick as ABs go early.

    In between, ball ripped from Kremer on their 22, several forward rumbles (Newell makes 4m) although always from standing starts, and Jordan comes in one out again and but for forward pass DMac was over by sticks.

    At 65, Aumua,Sititi and Ioane on. Two very good kicks from DMac in back field, one a metre away from 50:22.

    From lineout Niggles penalised (late - touchie?) for interfering with Puma jumper's arm on way down. IN FACT replay shows clearly his band on the ball. Gardner error.

    At 67 he redeems himself by stealing Puma ball in lineout. RD brain fart leads to 5m scrum.

    For scrum at 68, Puma TH bores in at 45 degrees and goes forward. Angus on other side, but looked a penalty for ABs on replay. EB misses textbook tackle on breaking 8, and try scored.

    Another seven Puma points originating from dubious penalty, this time in their half.

    ABs actually had much the better of period but scoreboard 0 -7.

    Niggles the Bad (dubious!), the Good and the Ugly.

    70 - 80 And here's where it gets ugly.

    ABs finish with three of the five tighties monstered by Boks in H2 of Twickenham friendly.

    And a tyro loosie.

    The results could have been predicted.

    In first three minutes Aumua throws in crooked to first lineout, and at scrum Gardner warns Newell not to overextend and Puma LH listened, and doesn't hit, so penalty. Annoying.

    Meanwhile, Pumas waste two minutes on TH sore thigh and Pablo's boots. FFS, Angus!!!

    Ratima bad missed tackle and Puma 12 makes good metres but messy ruck and AB lucky turnover. From our kick Puma kicks into touch on full so lineout half way. Another crooked Aumua throw, but Pumas don't jump and Sititi recovers.

    We run ball through several phases, but eventually AB forwards all on open side except Sititi who is tackled and in absence of cleaners holds on, so penalty.

    Kicked to touch 30 out, but after more time wasting (this time with clock on) Pumas make the take and march AB pack back 15m in maul. THIS DIDN'T HAPPEN WITH THE STARTING EIGHT. Twickenham undertones.

    Luckily RD special turnover penalty and ABs clear to touch.

    Lineout at 76: Throw straight, but Sititi forgets call and doesn't jump.

    Pumas drive several times, but met with good resistance, but Sititi tries to slow ball down and penalised.

    Carreras converts.

    Pumas then wind down, but Sititi jumps over fifth or sixth ruck and is penalised.

    Game over.

    Period 0 - 3.

    Takeaway, Pumas ended with most experienced forwards on field and ABs with least. It showed.

    sparkyS 1 Reply Last reply
    6

All Blacks vs Argentina I
Rugby Matches
allblacksargentina
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.