• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
1.6k Posts 96 Posters 134.8k Views
All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • SmutsS Offline
    SmutsS Offline
    Smuts
    replied to kev on last edited by
    #1357

    @kev said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    Watching the Breakdown. Jeff Wilson is spot on re Scott Barrett. Cleanout to shoulder. Lots of other clean outs similar. Should not have been a yellow.

    Sensible fella Wilson, obvious red.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to pakman on last edited by NTA
    #1358

    @pakman said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @NTA About nine minutes of official time.

    The scrum a minute later looked to me to be textbook.

    Let's watch a few eh?

    06:25 - solid from both sides. Malherbe has superb control and balance, with his knee nearly on the deck but driving EdG's mass up a tick, while bending his neck down.

    09:20 - post-hit:
    EdG isn't in great position, arched in the upper back a little.
    Lomax's side of the scrum is very low - by the time the camera zooms in, you can already see his knee on the deck through the tunnel.
    The call was black THP going to knee. There's no replay angle from that side but you can see it from the open side, and by Coles and EdG having to reset their feet as the motion goes sideways.

    10:38 - Boks take scrum from that penalty. Whatever Lomax did wrong in the previous scrum, he corrected it. Good scrum. Good contest. Boks called to use it.

    12:00 - Boks win the hit. Fucking quick heel from Coles and Ardie is away i.e.
    12:02 set called
    12:05 ball fed
    12:06 Ardie detaches

    P 3 Replies Last reply
    8
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #1359

    @NTA said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @pakman said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @NTA About nine minutes of official time.

    The scrum a minute later looked to me to be textbook.

    Let's watch a few eh?

    06:25 - solid from both sides. Malherbe has superb control and balance, with his knee nearly on the deck but driving EdG up a tick, while bending him down.

    09:20 - post-hit:
    EdG isn't in great position, arched in the upper back a little.
    Lomax's side of the scrum is very low - by the time the camera zooms in, you can already see his knee on the deck through the tunnel.
    The call was black THP going to knee. There's no replay angle from that side but you can see it from the open side, and by Coles and EdG having to reset their feet as the motion goes sideways.

    10:38 - Boks take scrum from that penalty. Whatever Lomax did wrong in the previous scrum, he corrected it. Good scrum. Good contest. Boks called to use it.

    12:00 - Boks win the hit. Fucking quick heel from Coles and Ardie is away i.e.
    12:02 set called
    12:05 ball fed
    12:06 Ardie detaches

    @NTA said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @pakman said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @NTA About nine minutes of official time.

    The scrum a minute later looked to me to be textbook.

    Let's watch a few eh?

    06:25 - solid from both sides. Malherbe has superb control and balance, with his knee nearly on the deck but driving EdG up a tick, while bending him down.

    09:20 - post-hit:
    EdG isn't in great position, arched in the upper back a little.
    Lomax's side of the scrum is very low - by the time the camera zooms in, you can already see his knee on the deck through the tunnel.
    The call was black THP going to knee. There's no replay angle from that side but you can see it from the open side, and by Coles and EdG having to reset their feet as the motion goes sideways.

    10:38 - Boks take scrum from that penalty. Whatever Lomax did wrong in the previous scrum, he corrected it. Good scrum. Good contest. Boks called to use it.

    12:00 - Boks win the hit. Fucking quick heel from Coles and Ardie is away i.e.
    12:02 set called
    12:05 ball fed
    12:06 Ardie detaches

    Good stuff! UK feed doesn’t show Lomax side, just EDG appearing to dig himself out of hole and FM hinging to ground. Saffer commentators were calling penalty against EDG!

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #1360

    @pakman said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    Saffer commentators were calling penalty against EDG!

    They're simple folk, and only call what they can see 😜

    I suspect the call came from the AR

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #1361

    @NTA First one FM very close to grass, EDG elbow to deck, then FM knee grazes ground, ball in and EDG elbow down a second time. Bloody impressive.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    replied to Steve on last edited by
    #1362

    @Steve

    I realise the whole “we have a deal” Garces thing wasn’t the point you were trying to make but…

    English is not his first language. The French for agreement is accord. It also translates into deal. No conspiracy, just a language blunder.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SmutsS Offline
    SmutsS Offline
    Smuts
    wrote on last edited by
    #1363

    High quality ferning @nta and @pakman

    Think it’d tempt @Red-Beard and @BartMan out of retirement.

    Wish refs would let the packs have at it for at least the first two or three scrums and then only blow the obvious skullduggery. But I feel the same way about mauls and rucks. And lineouts.

    Let forwards have a contest and they’ll actually do it - leaving space for the glory boys, opensides, to score tries. Put another way: marginal whistles tend to protect weaker teams and encourage gamesmanship.

    CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
    8
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    replied to Smuts on last edited by
    #1364

    @Smuts said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    High quality ferning @nta and @pakman

    Think it’d tempt @Red-Beard and @BartMan out of retirement.

    Wish refs would let the packs have at it for at least the first two or three scrums and then only blow the obvious skullduggery. But I feel the same way about mauls and rucks. And lineouts.

    Let forwards have a contest and they’ll actually do it - leaving space for the glory boys, opensides, to score tries. Put another way: marginal whistles tend to protect weaker teams and encourage gamesmanship.

    A very good point.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • BerniesCornerB Offline
    BerniesCornerB Offline
    BerniesCorner
    wrote on last edited by
    #1365

    There's too much negativity on here. We can still win this.
    Didn't have a shit show vs SA after 15 minutes man down and penalty avalanche.
    Schmidt and Ryan are smart will adapt.
    Cut out all cute shite inside our own half.
    Use JB's boot more.
    Value territory more.
    Fast paced pick n goes.
    Patience be prepared to go through the phases.
    We have played some outstanding rugby in the last 9 months. We can do it

    sparkyS chimoausC K Chester DrawsC 4 Replies Last reply
    12
  • Joans Town JonesJ Offline
    Joans Town JonesJ Offline
    Joans Town Jones Banned
    wrote on last edited by
    #1366

    I hope we can. Know we can't. Foster simply hasn't given the A team enough time together. Hell, 2007, 2011, 2015 we pretty much had the same team of core players. A year out from the RWC Foster almost loses to Scotland, England and Japan because he keeps changing the side. 2023, he had the opportunity to play most of the squad through Bled II and SA with weeks between each test and didn't. They aren't fatigued. I predicted we would lose this test, I didn't predict we'd lose so badly.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #1367

    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @Higgins said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @Machpants said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @antipodean said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @Machpants said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    And he can't own up when his team puts what is objectively the worst performance ever in black

    Utter fucking nonsense.

    So a28 point loss isn't objectively the worst ever? Carry on in your dream world. He at no point in the interview admits anything but good learnings. Not 'we didn't prepare well enough' nor 'the tactics weren't quite right' doing shitty little kicks in our 22.Just we will learn. Except they don't and haven't over the last 6 odd years

    Losing to Munster 12-0 in 78 is the worst ever…

    No it's not, I well remember a real spanking against Sydney 17 - 40 at Penrith in 1992 that was the ultimate pits. That's the same year we had an unbeaten tour of Sth Africa!

    That NSW side was basically the Wallabies other than about 3 players.

    Literally everything you've said there is wrong. It was a Sydney invitational, not NSW and none of the starting XVs were the same.

    Sydney:
    M. N. Hartill
    M. Bell
    A. Blades
    T. Kava (C)
    W. W. Waugh
    M. C. Brial
    S. P. Poidevin
    B. T. Gavin
    A. Ekert
    T. Wallace
    P. Jorgensen
    L. F. Walker
    R. C. Tombs
    D. K. Junee
    T. P. Kelaher

    Wallabies:
    A. J. Daly
    P. N. Kearns
    E. J. A. McKenzie
    R. J. McCall
    J. A. Eales
    T. Coker
    D. J. Wilson
    S. J. N. Scott-Young
    N. C. Farr-Jones (C)
    M. P. Lynagh
    P. V. Carozza
    T. J. Horan
    J. S. Little
    D. I. Campese
    M. C. Roebuck

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to BerniesCorner on last edited by
    #1368

    @BerniesCorner My guess is that we’ll go deep into this competition, but not win it. Semi Finalist and Finalist, we’ve got lots of talent and the ability to play in multiple ways. I think Friday night was something of a perfect storm.

    But we are still not the strongest up front, nor do we have the leadership to cope where multiple things go wrong or lots of bad luck.

    kiwiinmelbK 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    replied to BerniesCorner on last edited by
    #1369

    @BerniesCorner said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    There's too much negativity on here. We can still win this.
    Didn't have a shit show vs SA after 15 minutes man down and penalty avalanche.
    Schmidt and Ryan are smart will adapt.
    Cut out all cute shite inside our own half.
    Use JB's boot more.
    Value territory more.
    Fast paced pick n goes.
    Patience be prepared to go through the phases.
    We have played some outstanding rugby in the last 9 months. We can do it

    The problem is everything you mention above has been known for a long time and the fact Foster has not implemented it is very concerning.

    bootsB 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #1370

    @sparky said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @BerniesCorner My guess is that we’ll go deep into this competition, but not win it. Semi Finalist and Finalist, we’ve got lots of talent and the ability to play in multiple ways. I think Friday night was something of a perfect storm.

    But we are still not the strongest up front, nor do we have the leadership to cope where multiple things go wrong or lots of bad luck.

    If I had to take a stab , I would guess we will have a significant victory somewhere, where the faith gets restored ( like mt smart )

    Then follow that up with a significant loss , just feels like a destiny thing with this team to me .

    But I want that to be wrong and I’ll be celebrating more than anyone should we pull it off .

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to junior on last edited by taniwharugby
    #1371

    @junior and this is the problem with players cleaning out as they continue to do (something that we have seen throughout the past couple of years)

    Fly in at pace, throwing themselves at a player who is being a nuisance but not really affecting things, all it would have taken was for Marx to twist slightly and SB could be facing a long ban.

    If players had to bind prior to hitting a ruck it would take away some of these exocet clean outs and refs were tougher on players lying around the ball too.

    1 Reply Last reply
    9
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to kiwiinmelb on last edited by
    #1372

    @kiwiinmelb said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @sparky said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @BerniesCorner My guess is that we’ll go deep into this competition, but not win it. Semi Finalist and Finalist, we’ve got lots of talent and the ability to play in multiple ways. I think Friday night was something of a perfect storm.

    But we are still not the strongest up front, nor do we have the leadership to cope where multiple things go wrong or lots of bad luck.

    If I had to take a stab , I would guess we will have a significant victory somewhere, where the faith gets restored ( like mt smart )

    Then follow that up with a significant loss , just feels like a destiny thing with this team to me .

    But I want that to be wrong and I’ll be celebrating more than anyone should we pull it off .

    Yeah. I see us potentially hammering France in the opening game then getting done in the quarters. Or perhaps a repeat of 2019 - qf reaming then poor sf loss. This team just seems much too flaky to win a tournament like this.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #1373

    @Rancid-Schnitzel winning 3 big games on the trot (especially when you consider who the 1st 2 are likely to be) was always going to be hard, regardless of how we were tracking, but agree this side seems to lack the instincts and adaptability to do it.

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #1374

    @taniwharugby said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel winning 3 big games on the trot (especially when you consider who the 1st 2 are likely to be) was always going to be hard, regardless of how we were tracking, but agree this side seems to lack the instincts and adaptability to do it.

    It think it was mentioned that it's about winning despite having an off day. That used to be an AB speciality. Now if we have an off day we fall apart and get spanked.

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • Windows97W Offline
    Windows97W Offline
    Windows97
    wrote on last edited by
    #1375

    Well it's good to see Foster is back to his record setting ways, though I don't think he'll be able to grace us with anymore records at the RWC as we've already been bundled out in the 1/4 finals prior and I don't think he'll be able to top that.

    Our forward pack got bullied and beaten up, unfortunately without BBR, Scooter (to stay on the field) and Frizzle (can't believe I'm saying that) we lacked the ability to carry the ball forward. The thing is those 3 can carry the ball, their replacements just can't.

    We play a pod system which is only effective if you break the advantage line (you need a good ball carrier in each pod) to get you quick ball and go-forward otherwise you simply go sideways across the field. RM and BB then lack a tactical distance kicking game to get us out of trouble so lots of lateral movement stuck in our own half going for cute plays to try and generate some attack.

    Defense was brave but again we lost the physical battle, it's pretty easy to not give away penalties - you don't put your hands in the ruck and you make sure your behind the last feet. However if your doing that but just getting beaten up and loosing meters then sometimes it boils down to pushing the envelope to try and slow the ball down or turn it over and thus penalties ensue.

    I would hope it's that and not the fact that the players don't trust each other or the defensive patterns to work hence they "take it upon themselves". That's the worst case scenario though given McLeod's defensive patterns of late it might be true.

    Just a horror game, we can only flush the dunny and move on, RSA prime favorites to take this RWC at a canter unless Ireland or France can bully their forward pack.

    chimoausC M 2 Replies Last reply
    6
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to mencey on last edited by
    #1376

    @mencey said in All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham:

    This maybe the wake up call we need B 4 the WC. They needed a couple of more warm up games IMHO. This is just a shit show of unbelievable proportions.

    so...the last 4 years haven't been enough of a wake up call? losses to argentina, series losses at home to ireland....but this, final game right before the RWC...this is the wake up call?

    1 Reply Last reply
    8

All Blacks vs Springboks - Twickenham
Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.