SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil)

[Kirwan]

@Chris said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

Angus Gardiner Ref for this SF

Prefer him to the thief.

[Kiwiwomble]

how have we got this far without a comment on the title?!

[Tim]

@Kiwiwomble We long to be the villains of NZ rugby again.

[NTA]

Scoreless draw and multiple All Black short-term injuries.

Thanks

[Bones]

@KiwiMurph said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

@Bones said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

@Bovidae Berry and the blues have a chance. Gardner, might as well not turn up.

Guess the Blues might as well not turn up.

He definitely favours the favourites...

[Bones]

@Kirwan said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

@Chris said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

Angus Gardiner Ref for this SF

Prefer him to the thief.

Feel like he's going to do his best to change your mind!

[Kiwiwomble]

@Tim said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

@Kiwiwomble We long to be the villains of NZ rugby again.

im happy to consider you both evil if that makes you feel better

[Bones]

@Kiwiwomble he's a scientist that supports Harbour.

[Chris]

@Kirwan

Me too actually

[cgrant]

I guess Choat's selection on the bench over Segner's is based on tactical motives. Choat is more a jackal, while Segner is very good with his carries.

[Chris B.]

Jesus.

There's pretty much no firepower on the bench.

Bandages, but almost no firepower.

[Mattasaurus]

No Whitelock, the saders pack aint the same without him. Blues by 10

[Chris B.]

Crusaders and Blues clashing and there's probably only Scott Barrett who's part of the ABs starting pack - and he's out of position.

[Kirwan]

@Bones said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

@Kirwan said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

@Chris said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

Angus Gardiner Ref for this SF

Prefer him to the thief.

Feel like he's going to do his best to change your mind!

I don’t think he’s that good, but distributes his wackiness across both teams.

[ACT Crusader]

@Chris-B we are really digging deep into our tight 5 stocks with that bench.

Massive test for some of lesser played players.

[KiwiMurph]

@ACT-Crusader I daresay a lot of that bench won't see the field

[Tim]

@Chris-B said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

Crusaders and Blues clashing and there's probably only Scott Barrett who's part of the ABs starting pack - and he's out of position.

It's just not right! Clearly the spreading of talent to the other franchises has gone too far.

I will do one if Papalii doesn't start this year though.

[Nepia]

@Kiwiwomble said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

how have we got this far without a comment on the title?!

I commented on it on the first page.

[Crucial]

@Tim said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

@Chris-B said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

Crusaders and Blues clashing and there's probably only Scott Barrett who's part of the ABs starting pack - and he's out of position.

It's just not right! Clearly the spreading of talent to the other franchises has gone too far.

I will do one if Papalii doesn't start this year though.

On current form Paps is behind the much maligned Cane and doesn't deserve to start ahead of him.
He'll get his chance though, off the bench and in minnow games. Possibly even in warm ups.
Great that he will be there if Cane's form drops.

[Kiwiwomble]

@Nepia said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

@Kiwiwomble said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

how have we got this far without a comment on the title?!

I commented on it on the first page.

...yeah...thats on me