SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil)
-
@KiwiMurph TBH I'd have probably leaned toward Lam to start over Clarke
-
@KiwiMurph said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Pleased for Clarke who missed last year's playoffs through injury and for Papalii who came off of the bench in last year's final due to injury.
Injuries to Clarke and Dalton, and the Saders getting Whitelock back last year was a massive swing for the final.
-
@taniwharugby said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
@KiwiMurph TBH I'd have probably leaned toward Lam to start over Clarke
Yeah it's a pretty 50/50 call - Lam got his shot in last year's final vs Crusaders - Clarke gets his shot in this year's semi vs Crusaders.
-
I love how the crusaders now have two guys on the wing who are better at centre than the guy named there...who's probably better on the wing than one of those guys. Baffled.
Blues loosies will be licking their lips at getting stuck into some Strange. No...wait...
-
how have we got this far without a comment on the title?!
-
@Kiwiwomble We long to be the villains of NZ rugby again.
-
@KiwiMurph said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
@Bones said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
@Bovidae Berry and the blues have a chance. Gardner, might as well not turn up.
Guess the Blues might as well not turn up.
He definitely favours the favourites...
-
@Kirwan said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
@Chris said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Angus Gardiner Ref for this SF
Prefer him to the thief.
Feel like he's going to do his best to change your mind!
-
@Tim said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
@Kiwiwomble We long to be the villains of NZ rugby again.
im happy to consider you both evil if that makes you feel better
-
@Kiwiwomble he's a scientist that supports Harbour.
-
No Whitelock, the saders pack aint the same without him. Blues by 10