SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil)
-
how have we got this far without a comment on the title?!
-
@Kiwiwomble We long to be the villains of NZ rugby again.
-
@KiwiMurph said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
@Bones said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
@Bovidae Berry and the blues have a chance. Gardner, might as well not turn up.
Guess the Blues might as well not turn up.
He definitely favours the favourites...
-
@Kirwan said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
@Chris said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Angus Gardiner Ref for this SF
Prefer him to the thief.
Feel like he's going to do his best to change your mind!
-
@Tim said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
@Kiwiwomble We long to be the villains of NZ rugby again.
im happy to consider you both evil if that makes you feel better
-
@Kiwiwomble he's a scientist that supports Harbour.
-
No Whitelock, the saders pack aint the same without him. Blues by 10
-
@Bones said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
@Kirwan said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
@Chris said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Angus Gardiner Ref for this SF
Prefer him to the thief.
Feel like he's going to do his best to change your mind!
I donβt think heβs that good, but distributes his wackiness across both teams.
-
@ACT-Crusader I daresay a lot of that bench won't see the field
-
@Chris-B said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Crusaders and Blues clashing and there's probably only Scott Barrett who's part of the ABs starting pack - and he's out of position.
It's just not right! Clearly the spreading of talent to the other franchises has gone too far.
I will do one if Papalii doesn't start this year though.
-
@Kiwiwomble said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
how have we got this far without a comment on the title?!
I commented on it on the first page.