• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Depth at 10

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
83 Posts 37 Posters 3.3k Views
Depth at 10
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #27

    @voodoo said in Depth at 10:

    @bovidae said in Depth at 10:

    I haven't read the match thread yet but I take it RM has come in for plenty of criticism.

    The wider problem to me is that the way we play in SR isn't the best for developing how a 1st 5 needs to play in test rugby. Mo'unga, especially, always has much more time and space behind the Crusaders forward pack than he will ever get at international level. It's no surprise that he has looked best for the ABs against Aust, who play a similar style to NZ.

    None of the NZ SR teams employ the same aggressive rush defence that the NH teams and SA do. We really need to start using this defensive system ourselves so our players can adapt to playing against it.

    Having a larger, more robust 1st 5 can be an advantage so Sullivan could be an option. He needs a couple of years playing there for the Blues to answer that question.

    So, Jordie then....

    Or Havili?

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #28

    It's deep...

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #29

    @gt12 or TJ could re-invent himself at 10...

    but gee the cupboard is bare.

    I think both RM & BB have the ability, but our forwards arent giving them the platform they need, plus they dont have a plan b when the platform isnt there, which is a coaching issue, but tbf, both struggle at super when the heat is on too, so yeah.

    B J 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bobily2
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #30

    @taniwharugby said in Depth at 10:

    @gt12 or TJ could re-invent himself at 10...

    but gee the cupboard is bare.

    I think both RM & BB have the ability, but our forwards arent giving them the platform they need, plus they dont have a plan b when the platform isnt there, which is a coaching issue, but tbf, both struggle at super when the heat is on too, so yeah.

    I actually quite liked him at 10 the couple of times I saw him there for the Hurricanes. Incredible short-passing game (as one would expect)

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    ARHS
    wrote on last edited by
    #31

    I hope Dmac concentrates on 10 in Japan as insurance for NZ. He has the best vision and skill set. Zarn Sullivan Harry Plummer and Campbell Parata from Ta$man look to be the ones with most upward potential for me.
    Richie M is still gaining test experience and may improve markedly. He just needs to develop his vision and organise those around him to exploit gaps and create opportunities. Currently he let's the game come to him until he sees a gap he can run into himself.

    gt12G Mick Gold Coast QLDM 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to ARHS on last edited by gt12
    #32

    @arhs said in Depth at 10:

    I hope Dmac concentrates on 10 in Japan as insurance for NZ. He has the best vision and skill set. Zarn Sullivan Harry Plummer and Campbell Parata from Ta$man look to be the ones with most upward potential for me.
    Richie M is still gaining test experience and may improve markedly. He just needs to develop his vision and organise those around him to exploit gaps and create opportunities. Currently he let's the game come to him until he sees a gap he can run into himself.

    This is the best explanation of my problem with Mo'unga, although honestly it seems to be a problem with the whole team of 'drivers'.

    They react to what is in front of them rather than creating.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    wrote on last edited by
    #33

    I'm of the view that Mo'unga is actually a pretty bloody good player. I've seen him play a lot of good games, including against decent opposition, including when the Crusaders haven't been super dominant up front. I've also seen the Crusaders go very rapidly to shit against teams they would normally beat comfortably, when RM doesn't play through injury.
    He played very poorly tonight.
    I think some of that is pressure and getting up to speed with the higher level, and I think a bigger part of it is being part of a dysfunctional team, who doesn't know who there first choice line-up is, or what is expected of each of them, or who is in charge. The dual playmakers with BB and RM was shit as both were used to being the lead voice, and sharing it just confused the issue. It worked better with DM at fullback, but then they went for JB (after playing him on the fucking wing for christ's sake), and then chopped and changed between RM and BB. It's been a mess.
    And the midfield is musical chairs.
    And we've been using multiple halfbacks and #8s.

    Frankly it reminds me of Pat Lam coaching the Blues.

    nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus Banned
    replied to reprobate on last edited by
    #34

    @reprobate said in Depth at 10:

    I'm of the view that Mo'unga is actually a pretty bloody good player. I've seen him play a lot of good games, including against decent opposition, including when the Crusaders haven't been super dominant up front. I've also seen the Crusaders go very rapidly to shit against teams they would normally beat comfortably, when RM doesn't play through injury.
    He played very poorly tonight.
    I think some of that is pressure and getting up to speed with the higher level, and I think a bigger part of it is being part of a dysfunctional team, who doesn't know who there first choice line-up is, or what is expected of each of them, or who is in charge. The dual playmakers with BB and RM was shit as both were used to being the lead voice, and sharing it just confused the issue. It worked better with DM at fullback, but then they went for JB (after playing him on the fucking wing for christ's sake), and then chopped and changed between RM and BB. It's been a mess.
    And the midfield is musical chairs.
    And we've been using multiple halfbacks and #8s.

    Frankly it reminds me of Pat Lam coaching the Blues.

    Ouch.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Do not disturb
    sparkyS Do not disturb
    sparky
    wrote on last edited by sparky
    #35

    Mo'unga was poor last night and sadly not for the first time in the Northern Hemisphere. He struggled with both decision making and skill execution. It wasn't just that he was struggling with the rush defence. There was no passion or urgency to his play. He didn't drive the game at all. Perhaps, he just doesn't enjoy playing in Europe?

    Given the next World Cup is in France, Beauden Barrett will obviously be first-choice 10. I would be looking to develop other players like Mitchell Hunt, Josh Ioane or Otere Black as back-up First Fives for the RWC.

    Crazy HorseC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Mick Gold Coast QLDM Offline
    Mick Gold Coast QLDM Offline
    Mick Gold Coast QLD
    replied to ARHS on last edited by
    #36

    @arhs said in Depth at 10:
    ...

    Richie M is still gaining test experience and may improve markedly. He just needs to develop ...

    After four years an All Black and 33 matches? Of course ... 🤣🤣

    sparkyS 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #37

    @sparky as I was reminded earlier Black has left the building.

    sparkyS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Do not disturb
    sparkyS Do not disturb
    sparky
    replied to Mick Gold Coast QLD on last edited by
    #38

    @mick-gold-coast-qld said in Depth at 10:

    @arhs said in Depth at 10:
    ...

    Richie M is still gaining test experience and may improve markedly. He just needs to develop ...

    After four years an All Black and 33 matches? Of course ... 🤣🤣

    We've experienced his experience and he doesn't look like a World Cup player.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • sparkyS Do not disturb
    sparkyS Do not disturb
    sparky
    replied to Crazy Horse on last edited by
    #39

    @crazy-horse Hope the Hurricane pick him up. They are showing a lot of faith in Aidan Morgan and Reuban Love.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #40

    Our pack laid a platform today and the backs didn't know what to fucking do with it

    Our 2 tens are the same player, one just has more experience. I think BB is.all sorts.of ordinary but he's clearly the better test player

    Both should be sent away to watch Aaron Cruden film, a player with less talent, less size, but at least knew how to attack in test football.

    Running sideways is for kids.

    dogmeatD 1 Reply Last reply
    8
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    junior
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #41

    @taniwharugby said in Depth at 10:

    @gt12 or TJ could re-invent himself at 10...

    but gee the cupboard is bare.

    I think both RM & BB have the ability, but our forwards arent giving them the platform they need, plus they dont have a plan b when the platform isnt there, which is a coaching issue, but tbf, both struggle at super when the heat is on too, so yeah.

    The problem for both RM and BB is mainly their inability to kick themselves and the team out of trouble. This means they can only really only run or shovel on bad ball.

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    stodders
    replied to junior on last edited by
    #42

    @junior said in Depth at 10:

    @taniwharugby said in Depth at 10:

    @gt12 or TJ could re-invent himself at 10...

    but gee the cupboard is bare.

    I think both RM & BB have the ability, but our forwards arent giving them the platform they need, plus they dont have a plan b when the platform isnt there, which is a coaching issue, but tbf, both struggle at super when the heat is on too, so yeah.

    The problem for both RM and BB is mainly their inability to kick themselves and the team out of trouble. This means they can only really only run or shovel on bad ball.

    This. BB has never really had a good long kicking game, has he? I always wonder why he takes penalties for touch with his pop-gun boot when his younger brother has a howitzer.

    Last night, every time the ABs gave away a penalty, the French line kicker would put the ball back to or in the AB 22m. Huge territorial gains. It is small wins like this that the ABs need to focus on. When given the opportunity, surely it is worth grabbing 50m of territory rather than 20m!

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    replied to stodders on last edited by
    #43

    @stodders we have been too dumb to do this since Dagg was playing. 10s take penalties and clearing kicks despite being worse at it, or we risk hurting their little feelings I assume.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by booboo
    #44

    Bergus Furke (for the life of me I can't say it the right way around) was backup 10 for Saders last year.

    Is there any potential there? Did he play NPC (I saw f-all)?

    Bit of talk around McClutchie. Anyone who isn't @Stargazer got an opinion on his future?

    Also previous age group hype around Rivez Reihana. What's the story with him?

    Like the idea of Sullivan what little I've seen.

    DuluthD NepiaN 3 Replies Last reply
    1
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to booboo on last edited by Duluth
    #45

    @booboo said in Depth at 10:

    Bergus Furke (for the life of me I can't say it the right way around) was backup 10 for Saders last year.

    Is there any potential there? Did he play NPC (I saw f-all)?

    He struggled a bit. Doubt he'll have much impact on Super Rugby next year

    I suspect the Crusaders 10's will be ranked in this order:
    Richie Mo’unga, David Havili, Simon Hickey, Fergus Burke

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #46

    @duluth said in Depth at 10:

    @booboo said in Depth at 10:

    Bergus Furke (for the life of me I can't say it the right way around) was backup 10 for Saders last year.

    Is there any potential there? Did he play NPC (I saw f-all)?

    He struggled a bit. Doubt he'll have much impact on Super Rugby next year

    I suspect the Crusaders 10's will be ranked in this order:
    Richie Mo’unga, David Havili, Simon Hickey, Fergus Burke

    The fact that the Crusaders have Hickey in their squad tells you everything we need to know about the depth of ten in NZ. (All the best to him, seems like a good guy, but....)

    We are stuck with these two guys and now have a desperate need to develop a third now DMac (basically RM lite) is gone overseas. ABs need to pick a young guy they think has the game for Test rugby (ignore Super Rugby form, it just gives us more players like RM) and get him ready.

    Good luck <insert eye roll emoji>

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    3

Depth at 10
Sports Talk
allblacks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.