• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Wallabies v Springboks II

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
australiaspringboks
633 Posts 58 Posters 33.8k Views
Wallabies v Springboks II
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NTAN Online
    NTAN Online
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #575

    canefanC D 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #576

    @nta said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    About 30%? Revolving doors

    NTAN S 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to NTA on last edited by Derpus
    #577

    @nta 15 of the misses would've been on Kerevi. He's been immense since his return. That offload to Samu was something else.

    NTAN BonesB 2 Replies Last reply
    4
  • NTAN Online
    NTAN Online
    NTA
    replied to Derpus on last edited by
    #578

    @derpus said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    @nta 15 of the misses would've been on Kerevi. He's been immense since his return. That offload to Samu was something else.

    And he actually was tackled that time

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Derpus on last edited by
    #579

    @derpus said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    @nta 15 of the misses would've been on Kerevi. He's been immense since his return. That offload to Samu was something else.

    That's Carlos Spencer level shit, offloading to yourself.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • NTAN Online
    NTAN Online
    NTA
    replied to canefan on last edited by NTA
    #580

    @canefan said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    @nta said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    About 30%? Revolving doors

    23% - total 88, missed 20.

    Wallabies missed 4%

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Steven Harris
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #581

    @canefan quade cooper made 14 tackles 100% ..very impressive from a guy who was targeted by the Boks

    1 Reply Last reply
    10
  • A Online
    A Online
    ARHS
    wrote on last edited by
    #582

    Thought Boks forwards and halves looked off the pace. Vermeulen Etzebeth Mbonambi and the props are not mobile enough and Faf looks slower than I remember. The ref kept them in the game though with what I thought was some over zealous officiating. If AB's can stop the constant stoppages from the Bok forwards and not get penalised heavily they should do OK.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NTAN Online
    NTAN Online
    NTA
    replied to ARHS on last edited by
    #583

    @arhs said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    If AB's can stop the constant stoppages from the Bok forwards and not get penalised heavily they should do OK.

    Boks will be getting a rest under their posts a fair bit....

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to Stag on last edited by
    #584

    @stag said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    Just how shit were Gatlands Lions😳

    Just how outdated & limited was Gatland’s game plan?

    Picked the wrong players to execute his game plan when he had all the players he needed to smash the Boks with a different game plan

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #585

    @mikethesnow could have been a very dangerous backline outside Russell, with strike players like Hogg/Williams, Watson, Harris, etc.

    MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    wrote on last edited by
    #586

    Tremendous from Australia

    Some lovely attractive running rugby with deserved tries.

    Great to see guile best grunt.

    Hopefully they can do the same to the Argies.

    If SA get anywhere near NZ then we’ll be back in Heimlich land

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #587

    @bones said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    @mikethesnow could have been a very dangerous backline outside Russell, with strike players like Hogg/Williams, Watson, Harris, etc.

    And had better forwards than Australia who could have run them ragged

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Online
    NTAN Online
    NTA
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #588

    @mikethesnow said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    Great to see guile best grunt.

    We fucked up their grunt fairly well, too.

    I was happy to see the ref correctly adjudicate the maul, but also happy to see us adjust how we stopped it.

    The Boks threw almost exclusively to Orie and it seemed like they could never get it started.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #589

    @nta said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    Right to copy some shit I posted elsewhere:

    Our discipline still needs work and our high ball defense was ordinary.
    Boks didn't fire a shot - think they got sucked into trying to play a bit wide, and then went back to their maul which was providing them zero go-forward after initial penalty wins there.
    The balance of personnel is about right for the Wallabies BUT Koroibete is a target for high kicks, and while Hodge grew into the game, he looks like he's lacking confidence. Some good counterattack from us which is good to see - heads-up play lacking the last few years
    Where to for the Boks?
    They're not fit enough.
    They're not creative enough.
    Their cohesion shows exactly what they are: a team picked from across the world with limited time together executing a limited game plan that is fairly easily blunted.
    ABs by 30 next week.

    Yep, they were God awful under the bombs. Hodge was copping no end of shit and the crowd cheered ironically when he finally caught one. Korobiete was probably worse though. Get rid of Swindon as well. That hideous caveman is almost a card a game player.

    The Boks were just shit. But tbh that isn't the first time I've gone to Suncorp and seen them get touched up. For whatever reason they don't seem to care about losing to Australia but go psycho against NZ. Having said that, they seemed up for these games so maybe they really are just a mediocre side 🤔. That backline was hopeless. Le Roux has to be the most overrated player in the game.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    wrote on last edited by
    #590

    That was fun to watch, the best we've played since the 2019 Perth Bledisloe.

    For all the talk of kicking and mauling, the Bok game plan relies mainly on defence. Physical brick wall defence that starves you of points and creates opportunities on the counter.

    But when you miss tackles and mis-read like they did today then the whole thing falls apart very quickly.

    I was impressed with how we converted our chances, which was something we've struggled with under Rennie. We exploited space well and didn't force it with stupid cross-kicks or triple cut passes.

    Samu Kerevi has been the revelation, and the strongest argument possible for relaxing the Giteau rule. His introduction has changed our season. Quade gets the attention, but it's Kerevi who has won us games.

    Also a great game from Len Ikitau who is a lovely understated 13 with a great left boot. Great to see him hitting his straps.

    NTAN Rancid SchnitzelR 2 Replies Last reply
    11
  • O Offline
    O Offline
    Old Samurai Jack
    wrote on last edited by
    #591

    Goes to show the difference that a competent, experienced 10 running the cutter makes. Quade deserves all the attention he is getting.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    wrote on last edited by
    #592

    Any update on citings? That hit at the end looked like something you'd sit for a few weeks and a red card

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #593

    @nzzp said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    Any update on citings? That hit at the end looked like something you'd sit for a few weeks and a red card

    Maybe Scott Barrett will be the second Barrett to get his red card revoked, it was the same thing

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Online
    NTAN Online
    NTA
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #594

    @barbarian said in Wallabies v Springboks II:

    Samu Kerevi has been the revelation, and the strongest argument possible for relaxing the Giteau rule.

    The Springboks, however, are the strongest argument for making sure we don't just open the floodgates.

    barbarianB 1 Reply Last reply
    2

Wallabies v Springboks II
Rugby Matches
australiaspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.