• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
rwcallblacksengland
2.0k Posts 121 Posters 191.7k Views
RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1)
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • broughieB Offline
    broughieB Offline
    broughie
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #1803

    @Bones He kind of palmed him out of the way. No much really. It was karma for his hand in the ruck at the end of the super rugby final.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • JCJ Offline
    JCJ Offline
    JC
    wrote on last edited by
    #1804

    Eddie Jones pissed on our powder. Turns out wet powder is the bad kind. Sad.

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to broughie on last edited by
    #1805

    @broughie said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

    @Kirwan Bridge is also good at running good lines. Reiko has X factor though and he wouldn’t have been bundled into touch as easy as Reece or Bridge. Can’t blame these guys though and Rieko lost favor. Lost in in the forwards and the English defense everywhere was immense.

    Huh? Have you not been watching Rieko finding new ways to die with the ball? The only way he wouldn't have been bundled out is because he dropped it.

    broughieB D 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • broughieB Offline
    broughieB Offline
    broughie
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #1806

    @Bones maybe in the last couple of games hence he was dropped but ordinarily it was not a characteristic of him.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    wrote on last edited by
    #1807

    I can handle a loss ,

    But to be almost out of ideas , completely out coached , was tough to swallow ,

    Shag has been good , but this was the worst night of his coaching career , not a nice way to finish.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • MokeyM Offline
    MokeyM Offline
    Mokey
    wrote on last edited by
    #1808

    One thing that would be really good going forward: the backline not being tinkered with every other week. Our midfield has suffered for that especially.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #1809

    @Bones said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

    @Catogrande said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

    @Bones said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

    @Catogrande I don't think you're allowed to just say red. I think you have to announce every bottle of wine by it's full name and year.

    My dear fellow wine IS red. It's only white wine that's white.

    Astounding arrogance.

    Beta-cuck

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastie
    wrote on last edited by
    #1810

    alls I'm gunna say is this fluffybunny jinxed us... confident fan gets tattoo

    I said it to the wife before the game and what do you know. get him in the high court, charge him with treason.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by Rapido
    #1811

    For the NZ post mortem.

    1. Poor mental preparation.
    2. Forward pack was missing. (Related to point 1)
    3. Poor tactics, going wide against a rush defence without earning the right (related to point 1 and 2).
    4. Getting bundled into touch. FFS. (Related to point 3)
    5. Passive defense.

    Selections fairly irrelevant for me to the outcome. No B Smith on the bench the only stinker.

    We have a lot of players and coaching staff with experience of following up a good knockout game with a stinker from both 2011 and 2015, but no learnings seemingly. Got way too excited by the opportunity to play Ireland. Poor mental prep. A very naive last fortnight.

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    DMX
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #1812

    @Bones said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

    @broughie said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

    @Kirwan Bridge is also good at running good lines. Reiko has X factor though and he wouldn’t have been bundled into touch as easy as Reece or Bridge. Can’t blame these guys though and Rieko lost favor. Lost in in the forwards and the English defense everywhere was immense.

    Huh? Have you not been watching Rieko finding new ways to die with the ball? The only way he wouldn't have been bundled out is because he dropped it.

    Yes that is dreaming to think he would have made a difference he lost favor because he lost form and confidence, he wasn’t going to suddenly regain it in the semi. Besides I would take Bridge all day long under the high ball.

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by
    #1813

    England's performance reminded me of our 2011 semifinal performance. A perfect application of suffocating pressure but where the scoreline never quite blew out.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    mikey07
    wrote on last edited by
    #1814

    I went to bed and thought when I wake up it’ll be just a bad dream but alas when I woke up the result was the same 😂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to DMX on last edited by
    #1815

    @DMX said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

    @Bones said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

    @broughie said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

    @Kirwan Bridge is also good at running good lines. Reiko has X factor though and he wouldn’t have been bundled into touch as easy as Reece or Bridge. Can’t blame these guys though and Rieko lost favor. Lost in in the forwards and the English defense everywhere was immense.

    Huh? Have you not been watching Rieko finding new ways to die with the ball? The only way he wouldn't have been bundled out is because he dropped it.

    Yes that is dreaming to think he would have made a difference he lost favor because he lost form and confidence, he wasn’t going to suddenly regain it in the semi. Besides I would take Bridge all day long under the high ball.

    And that sort of selection policy and player management got us last nights result.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    cgrant
    wrote on last edited by
    #1816

    People in this forum are great fans of Richie Mounga. He's had a mare : missed an easy tackle on Daly who is not the quickest fullback nor the strongest one (this led to England's first try), then could not handle the English rush defence. Let's hope he'll learn from this very disappointing performance.
    The Bounga experiment was clearly a failure with BB's kicking from hand being an issue. Would DMac have done better ?

    MiketheSnowM ACT CrusaderA D BerniesCornerB broughieB 6 Replies Last reply
    9
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to cgrant on last edited by
    #1817

    @cgrant said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

    People in this forum are great fans of Richie Mounga. He's had a mare : missed an easy tackle on Daly who is not the quickest fullback nor the strongest one (this led to England's first try), then could not handle the English rush defence. Let's hope he'll learn from this very disappointing performance.
    The Bounga experiment was clearly a failure with BB's kicking from hand being an issue. Would DMac have done better ?

    Yes.

    Cause that little bastard has the x factor

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #1818

    @MiketheSnow we just needed one try against the run of play to steal a win.

    Reese was there for that and was easily contained, DMac is certainly up for that sort of impact.

    But probably would have also thrown an interception

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #1819

    Ben Smith wasn't there because he was out of form. At other times, players have been backed to come back from that. We missed him so much. The ball was always going over Reece's head. He has a lot of development to do. We also missed a proper number six who could offer more physicality.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to cgrant on last edited by
    #1820

    @cgrant said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

    People in this forum are great fans of Richie Mounga. He's had a mare : missed an easy tackle on Daly who is not the quickest fullback nor the strongest one (this led to England's first try), then could not handle the English rush defence. Let's hope he'll learn from this very disappointing performance.
    The Bounga experiment was clearly a failure with BB's kicking from hand being an issue. Would DMac have done better ?

    Lots of players didn’t really put their mark on the game like they have previously or would’ve liked to. Our 9/10 combo, our locks, our midfield barely combined for a play rather it was one out stuff from them. The front rowers seemed ineffective at the ruck.

    England pressure caused many of our players problems.

    DMac is a talented player and most likely would’ve been in the 23 either starting at fullback or on the bench given the way he was being selected before the injury. Whether he would’ve done better though is like saying Mauger would’ve done better than Lucky or Howlett better than Rocokoko in 2007....

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #1821

    I had a think about it and put my comments on Twitter. Here they are redrafted for the Fern:

    England don't rely on bounce of the ball. They may never be the most creative set of individuals but roles and responsibilities are understood and executed using the talents they have - an Eddie Jones hallmark.

    The ABs historically have a hard-nosed approach to the basics, but in recent years they've become a little tinny with some of their "miracle" plays like Barrett magic. They didn't have that, and tried too hard to find it last night.

    The "we will out-Kiwi them eventually" doesn't always stick

    You got a couple of rough calls from Nigel, which also historically hasn't happened (with Owens or any other ref). At that point the contrasts between leadership of McCaw and Read were highlighted.

    The NZRFU systems will ensure that kind of loss remains a rarity, but it's time for a refresh in the coaching ranks.

    In a way I'm disappointed (ABE) but would a threepeat with another tinny win be good for the game as a whole?

    No.

    Also interested to see ex-Fern stalwart Red Beard on Twitter, speculating about absences:

    Screenshot_20191027-082103~2.png

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    13
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #1822

    From our seats it was clear from the start that England challenged us up front and we were found wanting. We never looked like winning, in fact the score flattered us. The backs were neutered as a result of the forwards' inability to get parity

    K NTAN 2 Replies Last reply
    2

RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1)
Rugby Matches
rwcallblacksengland
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.