Highlanders v Reds
-
Geez I said the Reds looked weak earlier in the thread but there are some future stars there with Rodda, Tupou and especially Jordan Petaia how good was he! He's like the Australian version of Rieko Ioane. Great effort from them with one player being over 25 in their side.
-
@mariner4life said in Highlanders v Reds:
Good game that. Reds should be bloody proud of that effort
Watch the post game on Foxtel. The chick presenter has an incredible rack!
-
@Rancid-Schnitzel Louise Ransom.
Fuck yeah.
-
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Highlanders v Reds:
@mariner4life said in Highlanders v Reds:
Good game that. Reds should be bloody proud of that effort
Watch the post game on Foxtel. The chick presenter has an incredible rack!
Whoa, are we still allowed to write that sort of thing on here?
Won’t it attract the PC police and feminist groups?
🤣🤣🤣 -
@Gunner said in Highlanders v Reds:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Highlanders v Reds:
@mariner4life said in Highlanders v Reds:
Good game that. Reds should be bloody proud of that effort
Watch the post game on Foxtel. The chick presenter has an incredible rack!
Whoa, are we still allowed to write that sort of thing on here?
Won’t it attract the PC police and feminist groups?
🤣🤣🤣This is TSF, not farking Twitter.
-
Louise Ransom is haaawwwwt
-
@mariner4life "yes waiter, I'd like the Ransome / Yoannidis sandwich please"
-
-
So, if the Crusaders intend to play by the rules regarding the limits on AB playing time over the first 3 weeks it is possible that they have saved up the non-playing time for the Reds game as the lesser of the first three.
Judging by today's showing (I haven't watched it), have they potentially misjudged what the Reds will bring? -
-
@NTA said in Highlanders v Reds:
@chimoaus said in Highlanders v Reds:
I suspect that rack has been enhanced.
They're pushed up, but in no way fake.
Explain.
-
@Crucial said in Highlanders v Reds:
So, if the Crusaders intend to play by the rules regarding the limits on AB playing time over the first 3 weeks it is possible that they have saved up the non-playing time for the Reds game as the lesser of the first three.
Judging by today's showing (I haven't watched it), have they potentially misjudged what the Reds will bring?No. Plenty of areas for the Crusaders to attack. The Highlanders really struggled at lineout and scrum time too.
It will be closer than they expected though.
-
@Bones said in Highlanders v Reds:
@NTA said in Highlanders v Reds:
They're pushed up, but in no way fake.
Explain.
I have not touched them, but I have seen her in a variety of clothing as she's been working for FoxSports here for years. No fakies, just a pushup on that evening gown.
-
My tuppence worth before reading the thread...
- Highlanders the better team and good for the win.
- The old adage about never give a team an even break jumps to mind
- Clan should have been 20 points up. But fuck learn to catch a ball!
- Ref was random. But both sides suffered.
- Dear Mr Anselmi. Pleass learn what a forward pass is.
- Should have been a yellow for the deliberate knock on by Petaia (no PT just yellow)
- Great game!!!
- Right team won.
-
@Kirwan said in Highlanders v Reds:
@Crucial said in Highlanders v Reds:
So, if the Crusaders intend to play by the rules regarding the limits on AB playing time over the first 3 weeks it is possible that they have saved up the non-playing time for the Reds game as the lesser of the first three.
Judging by today's showing (I haven't watched it), have they potentially misjudged what the Reds will bring?No. Plenty of areas for the Crusaders to attack. The Highlanders really struggled at lineout and scrum time too.
It will be closer than they expected though.
Probably won't matter as the Saders will find a loophole and continue to play their ABs anyway. If you have the advantage they do it is no use throwing it away.
