Reds vs Chiefs
-
@bones said in Reds vs Chiefs:
Chiefs lose their star first five and end up looking like the blues... Hmmm.
"Star" is pushing it -- he's the third best fullback in NZ, at best. I like watching him play, but he's a mix of awesome and awful in every game.
"Star first five" is confusing the "star" and the "first five" bits. They aren't related, any more than calling Ritchie McCaw "world famous helicopter pilot" would be correct.
-
As mentioned by the commentary team at the end of the game. I assume the other 5 are all Crusaders players, although Mealamu, Gregan and Matfield could be possibilities.
-
Messam needed 161 games to pick up 100 wins.
Sooo...Crockett is a given. If Bovidae is right then the others would surely be Ellis, Flynn, McCaw and Carter.
Were the Crusaders successful enough for Dan to get to 100 wins from 141 games? I'm a bit doubtful.
On the other hand, it's hard to see there'd be anyone from a different franchise
who'd get there with less games than Messam.So I'm going with Crockett, Ellis, Flynn, McCaw, Messam and Mealamu.
-
The Chiefs definitely need Dmac's spark on attack. Will they have to rest him v Jaguares, and when will Falcon be back?
Really impressed with Tuinukuafe, Polwart and Ardron, who all stepped up, and Fa'auli had his best game. Not so much by Alaimalo, Mmac and Sowakula though. Ben Lam way ahead of Alaimalo. But, the Reds were pretty poor all the same, so the mistakes didn't cost Chiefs much.