• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks v Ireland II

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksireland
1.1k Posts 87 Posters 322.4k Views
All Blacks v Ireland II
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastie
    wrote on last edited by
    #12

    Selection time got real interesting for this one...

    Massive fan of Beaudy - but for me whoever starts comes down to whichever halfback the selectors feel is the best fit for this game. I feel the consensus is TJP should have started the Chicago game, and Smith sometimes gets monstered.
    Hansen will really earn his money this week, making assumptions on what Ireland will do and where they will attack us. Schmidt will know what worked well last test, and where they targetted us, but it would be folly to assume they can beat us in exactly the same areas, however they absolutely have to get to the same standard they achieved last test.

    For me TJP starts, which means Beauden starts. TJP doesn't have any combo with Cruden, whereas the Smith/Cruden number goes back to Manawatu and plenty of tests, thus those are our bench guys.

    Dagg definitely comes back in. Its a coin-toss between Savea & Naholo - but maybe Savea gets the nod. Ben Smith at the back.

    ALB & Fekitoa start, I'd personally love for Rieko to get the bench nod as a winger, I reckon hes got the head on his shoulders for the big time. Ben Smith to cover midfield

    Forward pack is straight forward enough I reckon. Retallick and Scott Barrett - I think PT is great for impact - just not sure about combat in the trenches.

    Kaino, Cane & Read. If Jerome Kaino is injured - could they go a Cane, Savea, Read - 6,7,8 ?

    Franks, Coles, Moody to start, Crockett, Taylor, Faumuina to close it out.

    so...
    Franks, Coles, Moody
    Retallick and Scott Barrett
    Kaino, Cane & Read
    TJP & BB
    ALB, Fekitoa
    Savea, Dagg, BFA

    Crockett, Taylor, Faumuina
    Whitelock
    A.Savea
    Smith, Cruden, Ioane

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastie
    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    Whos the Ref?

    UniteU 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    This is the most excited I have been for a game since WC final. The atmosphere will be electric. I wonder how much tickets are going for on black market.

    I really think BB goal kicking could haunt us if he starts. With this pressure I just don't trust him and we may need all the points we can get. I read an article somewhere which stated BB was rated the worst kicker out of all the top countries.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by
    #15

    Although he often overdoes them, Cruden's chip kicks often help create doubt in a rush defense. I thought he did it wellish against Italy. I'd be tempted to start him again, especially with ALB at 12.

    So:

    Moody (better be better), Coles, Franks
    Retallick, S. Barrett
    Kaino, Cane & Read
    A. Smith, Cruden
    ALB, Fekitoa
    Savea (somewhat lucky), Dagg, BFA at 15

    Crockett, Taylor, Faumuina, Squire, A.Savea
    TJP, B Barrett, Ioane or Tamanivalu

    Bet I've got at least 5 of those wrong, compared to what will be picked.

    SiamS westcoastieW 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #16

    @gt12 said in Ireland II:

    Although he often overdoes them, Cruden's chip kicks often help create doubt in a rush defense. I thought he did it wellish against Italy. I'd be tempted to start him again, especially with ALB at 12.

    Yes.
    They aren't a guaranteed try scoring opportunity and shouldn't be treated as such, rather a component of the "chess match" designed to reap benefits later on

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    wrote on last edited by Siam
    #17

    Should reward Crockett with a start after last night. Depends what the scrum gurus reckon I guess but a good message to both Crockett and Moody if Crockett gets the nod

    Do you give Beaudy a chance at redemption or are selection strategies not so forgiving? Perhaps solace in the impact role for Beaudy off the bench

    Play Barrett if Whitlock ain't fit. Bad luck Romero

    Izzy and Naholo on a wing, if Julien asks just mention running right behind a goaline instead of left into open pastures

    TJP to start - no shit sherlock

    Who's left in midfield? ALB and feki will be ok

    Basically all the intrigue will be at ten and the two forward subs not in the front row

    Crockett
    Coles
    Franks
    BBBR
    Whitelock/Barrett
    Kaino
    Cane
    Read
    TJP
    Cruden
    ALB
    Feki
    Izzy
    Naholo
    BFA

    Charlie
    Cody
    Joe
    Liam
    Arid
    Aaron
    Beaudy
    Jules

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #18

    Stands to reason that the dirty dirties from this week will be playing next week.

    Whitelock was out running around for a good 40 minutes before the game, looked ok to me.

    Is Crotty injured still? He was running around playing touch at the end I'm sure.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • UniteU Offline
    UniteU Offline
    Unite
    replied to westcoastie on last edited by
    #19

    @westcoastie Jaco Peyper (SARU)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastie
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #20

    @gt12 Whitelock over Squire - but this or swap 9 & 10's

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    I can't see Savea being dropped after not being in the 23 against Italy. It's a Naholo v Dagg call to start. I'd start Dagg and have Naholo on the bench.

    ALB and Fekitoa unless if Crotty is fit, I'd go with Crotty and ALB.

    Smith and Barrett. TJP and Cruden on the bench. I would love to see Lima start against France.

    Moody, Coles and Franks pick themselves. Likewise Crockett, Taylor and Charlie pick themselves for the bench.

    Kaino, Cane and Read - all 3 need a rocket because they were all poor in Chicago. Savea on the bench.

    Brodie back a certainty. If Whitelock is fit he plays and Tuipoluto on the bench.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by Stargazer
    #22

    What a bollocks that B Barrett needs redemption. He's by far the best 10 we have now, so he should get the start. As has been said several times by the coaches, B Barrett struggled with his health and he needed a rest. He's had a week of rest; if he is fit to play, he should start. Hopefully his kicking is better, but in all other respects, he's way better than Cruden at the moment. Also, v Ireland in Chicago, Beauden only mist one kick out of five, so his kicking problems shouldn't be exaggerated.

    TJP has been better the last few games, most notably in the 2nd half of the game v Ireland in Chicago, and also deserves the start, regardless of who plays at 10. Won't mind if Smith starts though.

    Also, people who keep on mentioning Romano: is it even certain he has returned to the squad? For me, S Barrett ahead of Tuipulotu.

    I think this comes close to the line-up v Ireland in Dublin:

    Crockett - Coles - Franks
    Retallick - S Barrett
    Kaino (if healthy)/Squire - Cane/Todd** - Read
    Perenara - B Barrett
    Lienert-Brown - Fekitoa (unless Crotty if fit to play)
    Savea - Dagg - B Smith (at 15)

    Taylor - Moody - Faumuina
    Whitelock (if healthy)/Tuipulotu - Squire (if not starting)/Dixon - Todd (if not starting)/A Savea
    A Smith - Cruden/Sopoaga - Naholo (unless Crotty starts; in that case Fekitoa)

    **not sure about Cane or Todd. Normally, I'd expect them to start Cane, but due to the fact that he hasn't been convincing since his return from injury & played 80 minutes v Italy, Todd might get the nod as he has been steadily improving this year, was an absolute beast in Bledisloe III & there's not much between them at the moment. A Savea didn't seem physically up to it against the Irish in Chicago, so I'd hesitate to even name him on the bench.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #23

    I'm just fucking astounded the world's premier halfback has one bad game and everyone wants him dropped.

    SiamS rotatedR R 3 Replies Last reply
    7
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by Siam
    #24

    @mariner4life said in Ireland II:

    I'm just fucking astounded the world's premier halfback has one bad game and everyone wants him dropped.

    Hear ya but the tackling and muscle around the ruck are a good argument and an area the paddies exploited last time

    The plan will be to smash those emerald isle fuckers this time won't it?

    Toilet boy ain't got his swagger back yet either IMO

    nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to Siam on last edited by
    #25

    @Siam I thought A Smith played well against Italy?
    I am still stunned how good ALB is, at either 12 or 13.
    I thought Naholo actually had a good match and is defensively more reliable than Savea but they'll pick the latter and put some pressure on him to perform.
    Cruden, Barrett, Sopoaga-a good problem to have!

    Am also tempted to think Patrick is better off the bench..

    SiamS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to nostrildamus on last edited by
    #26

    @nostrildamus
    Yeah, he did. He was quick with the pass, made good breaks. He added a lot vs Italy

    I'd go for Perenara for the physicality v Ireland. May it be so again that when facing a recent conquering team the ABs fucken pile in physically and willingly. Smash the feckers. I think TJP is better suited ti start to compliment this style. Nugget for the last 25-30 mins to run 'em around would be ideal I reckon

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derm McCrum
    wrote on last edited by
    #27

    Hmmmm.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    profitius
    wrote on last edited by
    #28

    The Ireland side will probably remain unchanged. Peter O'Mahony will be the only change in the squad and whether or not he starts is the question.

    I don't think we (Ireland) will win this one. There are a few good reasons. Obviously the ABs will be firm favourites but from an Ireland point of view, everything went to plan in Chicago and thats unlikely to happen twice in a row. Hansen will be analysing the match and will strengthen areas the ABs got caught out, like the maul, not giving penalties away, garryowens etc. And in Chicago the ABs still scored 4 tries.

    Ireland can still make it a tough game and they'll do the same again... mainly not give the ball away too easily. The Ireland defence is good and even the forwards are athletic and fairly fit. More mobile than the Australians and South Africans while probably being more physical than the Argentinians. Andy Farrell has made a massive difference since taking over in the summer and that might have caught the ABs off guard in the first test. It was interesting to see the ABs kick-pass the ball so much against the Italians. It was almost like they were practising it. I'd say we might see a bit of that next week.

    So I would say business for the ABs but sport can throw up surprises. The weather will be a bit different than it was in Chicago.

    Billy TellB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    replied to profitius on last edited by
    #29

    @profitius said in Ireland II:

    The Ireland side will probably remain unchanged. Peter O'Mahony will be the only change in the squad and whether or not he starts is the question.

    I don't think we (Ireland) will win this one. There are a few good reasons. Obviously the ABs will be firm favourites but from an Ireland point of view, everything went to plan in Chicago and thats unlikely to happen twice in a row. Hansen will be analysing the match and will strengthen areas the ABs got caught out, like the maul, not giving penalties away, garryowens etc. And in Chicago the ABs still scored 4 tries.

    Ireland can still make it a tough game and they'll do the same again... mainly not give the ball away too easily. The Ireland defence is good and even the forwards are athletic and fairly fit. More mobile than the Australians and South Africans while probably being more physical than the Argentinians. Andy Farrell has made a massive difference since taking over in the summer and that might have caught the ABs off guard in the first test. It was interesting to see the ABs kick-pass the ball so much against the Italians. It was almost like they were practising it. I'd say we might see a bit of that next week.

    So I would say business for the ABs but sport can throw up surprises. The weather will be a bit different than it was in Chicago.

    It's a cliché, but Ireland don't do "not the underdog" very well. So on the one hand, expectation will be ramped up, on the other hand surely NZ won't play as badly as they did in Chicago?

    If I were Hansen, I would play some territory (Ireland don't remotely have the same ability to strike long-distance tries as NZ) put pressure on the Irish halves (hopefully resulting in Sexton spitting the dummy), don't give away silly penalties that allow Ireland to kick to the corner and maul, compete better on the high ball etc.

    I think the match could be very close though, especially if Ireland start well.

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #30

    @mariner4life said in Ireland II:

    I'm just fucking astounded the world's premier halfback has one bad game and everyone wants him dropped.

    He got hooked against the Boks earlier in the year for being average and in the mean time TJP has taken massive strides. His returns post the Wales series and Bledisloe I have been middling.

    That said there are some players who are core to the team and you have to give them every chance to fight their way out of it. Smith deserves the big stage and another crack at it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #31

    @mariner4life said in Ireland II:

    I'm just fucking astounded the world's premier halfback has one bad game and everyone wants him dropped.

    total knee-jerk. smith is the best halfback in the world, in all contexts except our forwards getting smashed. are we really willing to concede that that is going to happen?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

All Blacks v Ireland II
Rugby Matches
allblacksireland
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.