• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Pumas v All Blacks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksargentina
372 Posts 59 Posters 41.9k Views
Pumas v All Blacks
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    Tregaskis
    wrote on last edited by
    #75

    With all these grammatical errors now in the public domain, the CEO and Board of this esteemed publication will be forced to front the media to apologise for the actions of lazy subeditors. Advertisers and sponsors may tear up contracts and this house of cards will tip over eventually.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    Tregaskis
    wrote on last edited by
    #76

    Wow, big changes. There's a tweak to most units in the team: front row, lock, loose forward (injury enforced), inside backs, midfield. Somehow, the team still looks good. Of the stars who are fit, only the Feilding hairdresser sits in the stands.

    Happy to see Tuipolutu back in the team, Squire's run on debut, and hotly anticipating McKenzie's cameo.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Bones on last edited by MN5
    #77

    @Bones said in Pumas v All Blacks:

    @Frank I'm also sorry for typing "it" and not "or".

    If anyone says "would of" instead of "would have" I am gonna throw a massive interweb tantrum.

    Interesting that ALB is there ahead of Moala. Very surprising, anyone reckon there may be some elements of "shit better not pick him in light of what's happening with rugbys image back home" ?

    highly unlikely but stranger things have happened.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #78

    @MN5 shame no one did. Your tantrum tears would of tasted marvellous.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #79

    @Bones said in Pumas v All Blacks:

    @MN5 shame no one did. Your tantrum tears would of tasted marvellous.

    I like what you did there....but I'm still not giving you the satisfaction of an "upvote"

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #80

    Think this team has been selected with combo's they want to see in SA in mind. E.g. expect to see Fekitoa and Moala together at some point.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #81

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #82

    they must be one of the heaviest locking duos for the ABs?

    PT 125kg & BR 121kg...Whitelock is a weeny fella at 114kg.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by Stargazer
    #83

    Los Pumas:

    1. Nahuel Tetaz Chaparro
    2. Agustín Creevy
    3. Ramiro Herrera
    4. Guido Petti
    5. Matías Alemanno
    6. Pablo Matera
    7. Javier Ortega Desio
    8. Facundo Isa
    9. Martín Landajo (c)
    10. Nicolás Sánchez
    11. Ramiro Moyano
    12. Santiago González Iglesias
    13. Matías Moroni
    14. Santiago Cordero
    15. Joaquín Tuculet

    Reserves:

    1. Julian Montoya
    2. Lucas Noguera
    3. Enrique Pieretto
    4. Juan Manuel Leguizamon
    5. Leonardo Senatore
    6. Tomás Cubelli
    7. Jerónimo De la Fuente
    8. Matías Orlando

    Changes from the side that played against the Wallabies two weeks ago:
    Petti returns at lock and, as a result, Ortega Desio moves back to the backrow.
    At halfback, Landajo is starting and Cubelli moves to the bench.
    Moyano replaces González Amorosino on the wing.
    If/when he comes off the bench, De la Fuente will make his TRC debut.

    http://www.uar.com.ar/noticias/noticias.asp?idinfo=4963

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    wrote on last edited by
    #84

    Really stoked for TJP. I wrote him off this season, but he's made every post a winner so far. If he can continue to play like that then the abs just got a shitload better.

    Fingers and toes crossed.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    wrote on last edited by
    #85

    Heard an interview with Pat T this morning and he spoke about the double hip surgery and rehab, and how he has found it tougher than he expected getting back to full match fitness and dealing with the speed of the game ,

    I guess that explains a bit

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #86

    Good team.

    My only concern albeit a relatively minor one is how they will use the 4 loosies. None of Squire, Savea and Dixon have played 80 minutes of a test. The back end could get interesting if the game is still being played at pace.

    Also it seems Bender is covering midfield for this one.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    wrote on last edited by
    #87

    we look vulnerable to me. tuipolotou hasn't had a game in ages, but at least whitelock is on the bench. 2 rookie loosies starting and another on the bench. a bench prop who can't scrum. perenara with no smith on the bench. new midfield combo. bench backs are rookies.

    all very good players no doubt, but the argies are at home, and are good enough that a bit of luck and a couple of nervy performances could have us under the pump, and without as much experience as we're used to to sort that out.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #88

    but at least if the Pumas win, it will give the media something else to focus on next week!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    Crash
    wrote on last edited by
    #89

    With all the talk of Squire vs Dixon - looking at the Welly-Stags game, t occurs to me that Shields must have been a little unlucky to miss the ABs cut. He's carried his excellent form through from SR, and just looks hungry to get hands on the ball. Giving him the Lions captaincy was a good move for him, and a masterstroke for the Lions.
    I'm a fan of Squire, will be a good game for him to really impose himself on the opposition.
    Thinking about the ABs midfield, I wonder whether Wes Goosen might be in the running as a bolter for the EOYT. Have liked his touches and energy. He's quick, thinks on his feet plus added bonus - he's a good defender.

    BovidaeB C StargazerS ACT CrusaderA 4 Replies Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to Crash on last edited by
    #90

    Squire has to prove he is a starter at no.6 and not just someone who provides a 15-20 min cameo off the bench.

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    Crash
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #91

    @Bovidae
    Agreed. Plus he needs to stay injury free.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    cgrant
    replied to Crash on last edited by
    #92

    @Crash said in Pumas v All Blacks:

    With all the talk of Squire vs Dixon - looking at the Welly-Stags game, t occurs to me that Shields must have been a little unlucky to miss the ABs cut. He's carried his excellent form through from SR, and just looks hungry to get hands on the ball. Giving him the Lions captaincy was a good move for him, and a masterstroke for the Lions.
    I'm a fan of Squire, will be a good game for him to really impose himself on the opposition.
    Thinking about the ABs midfield, I wonder whether Wes Goosen might be in the running as a bolter for the EOYT. Have liked his touches and energy. He's quick, thinks on his feet plus added bonus - he's a good defender.

    Shields is second to none in terms of workrate. But his skills let him down sometimes (some Ferners say he's got tits for hands which is a bit harsh IMO).

    KruseK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    replied to cgrant on last edited by
    #93

    By the way... does having tits for hands make every willis a titty-f... ?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Crash on last edited by
    #94

    @Crash said in Pumas v All Blacks:

    With all the talk of Squire vs Dixon - looking at the Welly-Stags game, t occurs to me that Shields must have been a little unlucky to miss the ABs cut. He's carried his excellent form through from SR, and just looks hungry to get hands on the ball. Giving him the Lions captaincy was a good move for him, and a masterstroke for the Lions.
    I'm a fan of Squire, will be a good game for him to really impose himself on the opposition.
    Thinking about the ABs midfield, I wonder whether Wes Goosen might be in the running as a bolter for the EOYT. Have liked his touches and energy. He's quick, thinks on his feet plus added bonus - he's a good defender.

    Shields was only good for the Canes at the business end of the 2016 season; he was very average before that. Very inconsistent and a penalty magnet. Based on this year, I don't think he's that unlucky.
    I doubt Goosen is even on the AB radar.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Pumas v All Blacks
Rugby Matches
allblacksargentina
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.