ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?
-
@antipodean said in ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?:
@W32 said in ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?:
Picking any player he wants will result in more winning.
Assertion isn't an argument.
Yeah, yeah. I thought it was a discussion. My bad.
-
@ACT-Crusader said in ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?:
I like a limited application of an overseas selection.
One thing I’m a little concerned about and it has only been exacerbated with the exit of SA based super teams, is the very limited exposure we have to overseas styles and the playing experience that comes with that.
Pro rugby today is a game of very fine margins and having a player that has played for example in France or England week in week out against their test players or with them provides an insight that we simply don’t get from coaches and players watching film.
thats why coaches generally go overseas to get that experences not bring players back
-
NZR's high performance manager, Chris Lendrum, has stated that selecting players from overseas would mean reduced contact time with them, and would necessitate using a simplified game plan to compensate for that. Combined with the poor form that many players display after returning from Japan, I see a rather weak case for selecting overseas players.
The players most talked about are Mo'unga and Frizzell. They are average players at test level, and we have better players in NZ.
-
@OomPB said in ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?:
We have been through this many times.
Lord, protect me from these devious South African rugby prophets and the false gospel of Surf Jesus. Let us be like the humble beaver, in his willingness to sacrifice everything for that which is most holy, the Black Jersey.
[Ms. Ludwig XV 3 (83.MR.173), fol. 83. A Hunter and a Beaver, about 1270, Unknown artist/maker]Fun fact, beavers were genuinely seen as the representation of the “willingness to sacrifice anything that hinders the ability to devote oneself to Christ” in medieval Christian symbolism. So in the picture above, for example, the beaver bites off his own testicles (!) in order to get away from the hunter, with beaver testicles being seen as having medicinal value. I’m sure there’s a great joke in there, somewhere.
Apologies for the strange intervention, I saw some weird eschatological undertones in the post above and decided to run with it.
-
-
@Kiwiwomble said in ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?:
@SBW1 dont have 40mins to listen, who?
#BooBoo
@Mr-Fish said in ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?:Joey Manu?
Dumb.
And I'd say who is he? If he plays in Japan for two years, then comes back to NZ and joins SR he'll be following the last sucessful League AB, SBW
-
@Machpants said in ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?:
More possible good news from France, salary cap reduction
Heretic that can't be taken seriously: he criticised Siya ... !!
-
@OomPB said in ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?:
@Bones I am not sure what your stats means. If you want to create depth you will get knock over. Rassie brought 50+ players through and had 2 close losses. The Springboks will pull away .
Wriggle wriggle.
-
@OomPB said in ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?:
The Springboks will pull away .
It’s interesting, I was looking at the profile of the current Springbok overseas players and it’s noticeable how they’re all experienced, senior players. Of the originally selected November touring squad, the 13 overseas players averaged 56 test caps, with an average age of 31.
That’s interesting because when Rassie first started in 2018, the overseas influence was often made up of inexperienced but highly promising players who, more importantly, were playing in some of the best-coached teams in Europe. In the 2018 Rugby Championship, there was Vincent Koch, with only 9 caps and coached by Mark McCall at Saracens, there was Faf de Klerk with 14 caps who was at Sale Sharks where he worked with renowned kicking coach Jon Callard, and a young Cheslin Kolbe was plucked out of high-performing Toulouse to make his Springbok debut.
Fast forward 6 years and where are the overseas Springboks playing? Urayasu D-Rocks, Honda Heat, Shizuoka Blue Revs... You see where I’m going with this. Look at the current top 6 teams in the Top 14: Toulouse, Bordeaux Bègles, La Rochelle, Bayonne, Toulon, and Clermont. At these 6 clubs combined, a total of 6 South Africans can be found (Carlu Sadie and Rohan Janse van Rensburg at UBB; Raymond Rhule and Dillyn Leyds at Stade Rochelais; Pieter Scholtz and Uzair Cassiem at Bayonne). It seems very unlikely that any of them will feature for the Springboks in the future. 6 years ago, these total numbers would be unthinkable. In the 2018/19 Top14 and Pro D2 seasons, across these 6 clubs (Bayonne was in the second division at the time), 16 South African players could be found, more than twice as many. Furthermore, these players were often much younger at the time, like Wiaan Liebenberg (26), Rynhardt Elstadt (27) and the aforementioned Kolbe (23). Of the six South Africans in these teams today, only Carlu Sadie is younger than 30 (27).
The reason for this seems relatively clear. South African players and especially young South African players, just aren’t that attractive a prospect anymore for high-performing European squads, due to their eligibility for their national team. Racing 92 dumped Kolisi after a single season when it became clear that his performances for them and those for the Springboks were of a totally different level. Saracens, their success basically built on South African players, currently have a grand total of 1 South African player, 29-year old Ivan van Zyl. This year’s Champions Cup Final had one South African across the 46 players, 1-cap fringe Springbok Jason Jenkins.
Again, I’m not claiming the coming demise of the Springboks but to me, it also seems quite clear that the market reality of 2018 when the eligibility rules were opened and the market reality of 2024 are markedly different for South African players. Where are the young promising South Africans in Europe who are benefiting from different high-performance environments, like Kolbe and de Klerk did when they left South Africa? Someone like Steven Kitshoff benefited greatly from his two seasons at Bordeaux before returning to South Africa, Esterhuizen became a different player playing alongside Marcus Smith in the all-attack system at Harlequins. The Springboks reaped the rewards (while, to be clear, obviously also doing their own part in the development of these players). There doesn’t seem to be an equivalent available in the coming years.
The introduction of overseas players for the Springboks wasn’t just a money thing, it also reintroduced valuable IP into the team, like Duane Vermeulen and Willie le Roux who had been experienced voices in big European teams. But when the best teams in Europe are seemingly uninterested in getting the best young South African players, where exactly is this IP going to come from? Might be interesting to contemplate those things some more. I’m sure that Rassie is more than aware of it.
-
@Mauss said in ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?:
@OomPB said in ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?:
The Springboks will pull away .
It’s interesting, I was looking at the profile of the current Springbok overseas players and it’s noticeable how they’re all experienced, senior players. Of the originally selected November touring squad, the 13 overseas players averaged 56 test caps, with an average age of 31.
That’s interesting because when Rassie first started in 2018, the overseas influence was often made up of inexperienced but highly promising players who, more importantly, were playing in some of the best-coached teams in Europe. In the 2018 Rugby Championship, there was Vincent Koch, with only 9 caps and coached by Mark McCall at Saracens, there was Faf de Klerk with 14 caps who was at Sale Sharks where he worked with renowned kicking coach Jon Callard, and a young Cheslin Kolbe was plucked out of high-performing Toulouse to make his Springbok debut.
Fast forward 6 years and where are the overseas Springboks playing? Urayasu D-Rocks, Honda Heat, Shizuoka Blue Revs... You see where I’m going with this. Look at the current top 6 teams in the Top 14: Toulouse, Bordeaux Bègles, La Rochelle, Bayonne, Toulon, and Clermont. At these 6 clubs combined, a total of 6 South Africans can be found (Carlu Sadie and Rohan Janse van Rensburg at UBB; Raymond Rhule and Dillyn Leyds at Stade Rochelais; Pieter Scholtz and Uzair Cassiem at Bayonne). It seems very unlikely that any of them will feature for the Springboks in the future. 6 years ago, these total numbers would be unthinkable. In the 2018/19 Top14 and Pro D2 seasons, across these 6 clubs (Bayonne was in the second division at the time), 16 South African players could be found, more than twice as many. Furthermore, these players were often much younger at the time, like Wiaan Liebenberg (26), Rynhardt Elstadt (27) and the aforementioned Kolbe (23). Of the six South Africans in these teams today, only Carlu Sadie is younger than 30 (27).
The reason for this seems relatively clear. South African players and especially young South African players, just aren’t that attractive a prospect anymore for high-performing European squads, due to their eligibility for their national team. Racing 92 dumped Kolisi after a single season when it became clear that his performances for them and those for the Springboks were of a totally different level. Saracens, their success basically built on South African players, currently have a grand total of 1 South African player, 29-year old Ivan van Zyl. This year’s Champions Cup Final had one South African across the 46 players, 1-cap fringe Springbok Jason Jenkins.
Again, I’m not claiming the coming demise of the Springboks but to me, it also seems quite clear that the market reality of 2018 when the eligibility rules were opened and the market reality of 2024 are markedly different for South African players. Where are the young promising South Africans in Europe who are benefiting from different high-performance environments, like Kolbe and de Klerk did when they left South Africa? Someone like Steven Kitshoff benefited greatly from his two seasons at Bordeaux before returning to South Africa, Esterhuizen became a different player playing alongside Marcus Smith in the all-attack system at Harlequins. The Springboks reaped the rewards (while, to be clear, obviously also doing their own part in the development of these players). There doesn’t seem to be an equivalent available in the coming years.
The introduction of overseas players for the Springboks wasn’t just a money thing, it also reintroduced valuable IP into the team, like Duane Vermeulen and Willie le Roux who had been experienced voices in big European teams. But when the best teams in Europe are seemingly uninterested in getting the best young South African players, where exactly is this IP going to come from? Might be interesting to contemplate those things some more. I’m sure that Rassie is more than aware of it.
Food for thought
But with many SA players competing against the best of Ireland and Scotland on a regular basis and the best of France and England in the European cup competitions arguably there are more SA players exposed to European rugby now than there were previously
-
@MiketheSnow said in ABs picking overseas players - inevitable?:
Food for thought
But with many SA players competing against the best of Ireland and Scotland on a regular basis and the best of France and England in the European cup competitions arguably there are more SA players exposed to European rugby now than there were previously
Absolutely. And I'm sure that this offers plenty of positives in its own right.
But my point was more around the experience of different coaching environments and team cultures at some of the best Champions Cup teams (none of the South African sides can be classified as such right now). At the moment, most young South African rugby players seem quite content to be staying at their franchises for their development. Or maybe they aren't as aggressively pursued as they once were.
Either way, it remains to be seen whether that's a good or a bad thing. But the point stands that the market situation has drastically changed and things haven't really evolved in a way that was particularly foreseeable in 2018.