• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

So, what HAS Michael Cheika actually done as a coach?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
225 Posts 59 Posters 45.4k Views
So, what HAS Michael Cheika actually done as a coach?
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    wrote on last edited by
    #34

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="BartMan" data-cid="608951" data-time="1472116447">
    <div>
    <p>OK, take away the Waratahs Super win as that was on a refs cock up, and the RWC final, as that was on another refs cock up.  ( I know, they're in the books, blah blah blah, but really, if you're selecting a coach, you would not lookk at those as great achievements - unless luck is soemthing that you want to use)!!!</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>That leaves, what? </p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Thanks to Wiki, a Heineken Cup with Leinster, and sod all else.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Is he really, really coach of the year, and an international class coach?</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Thoughts from our Aussies?  and Kiwis.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>And apologies if this has already been bought up, it's bene a while sice I fired up the old Commodore 64 and jumped on the Fern!</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>Excuse me, we don't allow trolls on this site, so on your way newbie......</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #35

    Cheika? What's he done?<br><br>
    He deliberately lost at Eden Park last year. God damn genius that! Genius!<br><br><br>
    PS BartMan! I thought you were dead. Or selling paint. If they're not the same thing. ..

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #36

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="hurricane" data-cid="608958" data-time="1472117123"><p>
    For example Sam Cane may not be the best choice for a 7,<br></p></blockquote>
    <br>
    About to bite. Checks username. Realises trolling. Swims on past rancid bait.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #37

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Hooroo" data-cid="609030" data-time="1472155641"><p>Excuse me, we don't allow trolls on this site, so on your way newbie......</p></blockquote>
    <br>
    Last one out, turn off the lights

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas Greenback
    wrote on last edited by
    #38

    <p>Australia almost (should not have) made it out of the 1/4 finals of the RWC, I thought they were pretty average in that tournament.</p>
    <p>Cheika does appear pretty over hyped. He is not a bad coach, he is a good coach.. but he has been pumped up to a level that is simply is not.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #39

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="booboo" data-cid="609036" data-time="1472156390">
    <div>
    <p>About to bite. Checks username. Realises trolling. Swims on past rancid bait.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>hurricane is a Chiefs man through and through...</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Online
    NepiaN Online
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by
    #40

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="BartMan" data-cid="608974" data-time="1472120024">
    <div>
    <p>Physical we have always been behind or equal, and have always have had to be better in the top two inches.  Boers are HUGE, Poms are gym monkeys, then it's us and the rest of the rugby world in bronze for the size stakes.  We just use what we have, by and large better than the rest.  Blitzkreig rugby - concentreate our force where they are weakest!!</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>I think that's historical and these days we run out with packs the same size as everyone now. In the past few years we've had heavier scrums that both those teams on various occasions (and if we'd selected Tubbyfuna we'd always have had bigger packs than them).</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>We've actually beaten the Boks and Poms recently by beating them up in the forwards. </p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>But I think it's a combo of us getting bigger, and those teams realising might isn't always right.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Anyway, good to see you back for a cameo Bart.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    wrote on last edited by
    #41

    Great to see you back Bart!<br><br>
    Cheika is a good coach, but he isn't the second coming like certain people think he is.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #42

    Depth is only part of the issue.<br>
    If you look at this year's selections Cheika is all over the place. <br>
    Two games ago the Oz pack delivered 75% possession against the Poms, who are no pushovers, and yet neither starting lock made the current squad (one injured I think). Contrast with Shag & Co's development approach where the continuity means if you can't pick 13 of the starting line up you must be clueless.<br>
    And recent policy of having shadow squad is only going to improve depth.<br>
    Bring on Saturday!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #43

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="BartMan" data-cid="608951" data-time="1472116447">
    <div>
    <p>OK, take away the Waratahs Super win as that was on a refs cock up,</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Are you going to take it away and give it to Toddy?</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>He will be pleased to have won one after all.  :)</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Nice to see you, Bartman!</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #44

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Nepia" data-cid="609064" data-time="1472164225">
    <div>
    <p>I think that's historical and these days we run out with packs the same size as everyone now. In the past few years we've had heavier scrums that both those teams on various occasions (and if we'd selected Tubbyfuna we'd always have had bigger packs than them).</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>We've actually beaten the Boks and Poms recently by beating them up in the forwards. </p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>But I think it's a combo of us getting bigger, and those teams realising might isn't always right.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Anyway, good to see you back for a cameo Bart.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>although I know in the lead up to the Super rugby final, people who had been around both the Lions and canes camps were amazed at how big the SA players were and wondering how the canes would match it...we know they did, but seems for now, they are still looking bigger.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SmudgeS Offline
    SmudgeS Offline
    Smudge
    wrote on last edited by
    #45

    <p>I feel like the mods should set a limit on newbies starting threads. Let's make it a minimum of 56,000 posts before you're allowed to create a new topic. That should keep those muscle-bound former Swamp Foxes out of our hair.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Online
    NepiaN Online
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by
    #46

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="609088" data-time="1472169576">
    <div>
    <p>although I know in the lead up to the Super rugby final, people who had been around both the Lions and canes camps were amazed at how big the SA players were and wondering how the canes would match it...we know they did, but seems for now, they are still looking bigger.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>I just had a quick look through both squad's heights and weights and the stats don't say they're bigger - maybe the fact the Canes selected two midget locks (under 2m) by choice makes it look difference but Broadhurst is as big (actually bigger I think) as any lock the Lions have, Vito is bigger than Whitely - in fact the Canes loose forward trio are all bigger than their opposites, the props are much of a muchness with May probably being the biggest in the two squads. So either peoples eyes aren't an accurate gauge of height and weight or the official websites are incorrect and if Ardie isn't in fact 6ft 7 then my faith in humanity has gone.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #47

    <p>dunno, always been that perception though hasn't it, perception vs reality though. See these guys on TV and think they will be huge, then you stand next to them and nup, but someone you don't think is huge, is....I barely came upto Ardie's chest and by Fern height, I'm 6ft 2!</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>May is a huge unit though!</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #48

    <p>Those white Saffers all seem to have farking massive broad shoulders which makes them look bigger/heavier then they are.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • UncoU Offline
    UncoU Offline
    Unco
    wrote on last edited by
    #49

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="609113" data-time="1472175778">
    <div>
    <p>dunno, always been that perception though hasn't it, perception vs reality though. See these guys on TV and think they will be huge, then you stand next to them and nup, but someone you don't think is huge, is....I barely came upto Ardie's chest and by Fern height, I'm 6ft 2!</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>May is a huge unit though!</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>Did you get a good look at Ardie's shoes? May have been wearing lifts.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    wrote on last edited by
    #50

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="rotated" data-cid="609013" data-time="1472135261">
    <div>
    <p>The England to Whitewash Australia thread before the series started is worth a reread for a good laugh. A rallying cry was "Look how far the team have come from McKenzie". They had two solid performances against NZ in his last year including a draw and last minute loss.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>A few also wax lyrical about his inspirational press conferences being integral to his wizardry. Now his press conferences resemble a sad puppy dog pouting that people are kicking him while he is down.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>The thing is the easiest time to coach is in your first year where you can shake up selection, tactics, captaincy etc, second easiest time is a world cup year when you have maximum buy in. Cheika had both at once. Now he has to build something over 4 years, this is a completely different gig than what he did in the 12 month sprint he did last year.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Lastly twice in the past seven games Cheika has taken full blame for stuffing up the preparation -  the Scottish QF and then last week. Either this is a tactic which will have diminishing returns or it's the truth in which case do you want someone who bottles it so regularly in high pressure fixtures.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>A large part of Cheika's undoing (along with Deans and McKensie) is that they have too much ego to hire a decent assistant panel. Steve Hansen I'm sure has had the odd poor week or unfocused week or pushed the wrong buttons - but he has a team around him that is going to be able to compensate for that and challenge him before he goes too far down the wrong path. Cheika has assembled an army of yes-men and rookies rather than a panel of equals.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Make sure the referee's changing shed is locked this week that's all I can say.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>well, i reckon i would rather have 4 years to plan and perform a job than 1. also who are these yes men and rookies? larkham and grey? ledesma? byrne?</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus Banned
    wrote on last edited by
    #51

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Hooroo" data-cid="609030" data-time="1472155641"><p>Excuse me, we don't allow trolls on this site, so on your way newbie......</p></blockquote>I can't believe a troll would use a commodore 64..

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus Banned
    wrote on last edited by
    #52

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Unco" data-cid="609135" data-time="1472187918"><p>Did you get a good look at Ardie's shoes? May have been wearing lifts.</p></blockquote>Played serious rugby in lifts? Seriously? Don't remember 'Prince' as a loose forward..

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    dejo
    wrote on last edited by
    #53

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Smudge" data-cid="609103" data-time="1472173045"><p>I feel like the mods should set a limit on newbies starting threads. Let's make it a minimum of 56,000 posts before you're allowed to create a new topic. That should keep those muscle-bound former Swamp Foxes out of our hair.</p></blockquote>
    <br>
    And besides, what's he ever done for us?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

So, what HAS Michael Cheika actually done as a coach?
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.