World Rugby confirms changes to be implemented across the global game
-
Can we call the 20 minute card an Orange and if the Welsh still object then call it a Welsh red card ..
-
@nostrildamus said in World Rugby confirms changes to be implemented across the global game:
Can we call the 20 minute card an Orange and if the Welsh still object then call it a Welsh red card ..
We’ll have more cards than Hallmark soon if we’re not careful
-
@MiketheSnow well it seems some fans love cards, so why not.
While WR are at it, if they see fit to card someone for an accidental head contact, there should be a mandatory HIA on the player that got this head contact (actually, some instances both players should have an HIA) that seems to rarely happen, sometimes can take many minutes before someone thinks to take them off for an HIA.
-
@taniwharugby said in World Rugby confirms changes to be implemented across the global game:
@MiketheSnow well it seems some fans love cards, so why not.
While WR are at it, if they see fit to card someone for an accidental head contact, there should be a mandatory HIA on the player that got this head contact (actually, some instances both players should have an HIA) that seems to rarely happen, sometimes can take many minutes before someone thinks to take them off for an HIA.
I understand where you're coming from but using that logic, ANY dangerous tackle should result in the tackled player being taken from the field.
Taking out a player in the air isn't always going to cause an injury but there's a much higher chance of it than if they're on the ground. It's the same for head-high tackles (intentional or not).
-
In amazing news new-style red cards are pretty bloody random, and poorly implemented in game by refs (and TMOs!). I get the protect the head, but considering the lottery of cards and the fact the multiple little bangs over extended seasons are quite probably worse, this is why we support the 20 min card
-
@Mr-Fish so you are saying if there is a head contact that is deemed worthy to send someone from the field and end thier game, potentially affect the outcome, they dont need to have an HIA?
this one was rescinded too....
Sadly, the game is littered with inconsistency around cards, and subsequent rulings on punishment (or not as is the case sometimes)
-
@Mr-Fish said in World Rugby confirms changes to be implemented across the global game:
@taniwharugby said in World Rugby confirms changes to be implemented across the global game:
@MiketheSnow well it seems some fans love cards, so why not.
While WR are at it, if they see fit to card someone for an accidental head contact, there should be a mandatory HIA on the player that got this head contact (actually, some instances both players should have an HIA) that seems to rarely happen, sometimes can take many minutes before someone thinks to take them off for an HIA.
Taking out a player in the air isn't always going to cause an injury but there's a much higher chance of it than if they're on the ground.
Just ban competing for the ball in the air if your team kicked it. Fuck off all the box kicks and you'd have not only a safer, but a better game.
-
@reprobate said in World Rugby confirms changes to be implemented across the global game:
@Mr-Fish said in World Rugby confirms changes to be implemented across the global game:
@taniwharugby said in World Rugby confirms changes to be implemented across the global game:
@MiketheSnow well it seems some fans love cards, so why not.
While WR are at it, if they see fit to card someone for an accidental head contact, there should be a mandatory HIA on the player that got this head contact (actually, some instances both players should have an HIA) that seems to rarely happen, sometimes can take many minutes before someone thinks to take them off for an HIA.
Taking out a player in the air isn't always going to cause an injury but there's a much higher chance of it than if they're on the ground.
Just ban competing for the ball in the air if your team kicked it. Fuck off all the box kicks and you'd have not only a safer, but a better game.
ABs don't compete 95% of the time and they still box kick the ball, so I dunno if that is going to make much of s difference
-
@taniwharugby said in World Rugby confirms changes to be implemented across the global game:
@Mr-Fish so you are saying if there is a head contact that is deemed worthy to send someone from the field and end thier game, potentially affect the outcome, they dont need to have an HIA?
this one was rescinded too....
Sadly, the game is littered with inconsistency around cards, and subsequent rulings on punishment (or not as is the case sometimes)
I'm saying that just because something is dangerous and needs to be punished, it doesn't mean it should always result in the other player being sent from the field.
Not every head contact will result in concussion just like not every tackle in the air will result in a broken neck. But we don't punish players based on the resulting damage, we punish based on the actions.
-
@Machpants said in World Rugby confirms changes to be implemented across the global game:
@reprobate said in World Rugby confirms changes to be implemented across the global game:
@Mr-Fish said in World Rugby confirms changes to be implemented across the global game:
@taniwharugby said in World Rugby confirms changes to be implemented across the global game:
@MiketheSnow well it seems some fans love cards, so why not.
While WR are at it, if they see fit to card someone for an accidental head contact, there should be a mandatory HIA on the player that got this head contact (actually, some instances both players should have an HIA) that seems to rarely happen, sometimes can take many minutes before someone thinks to take them off for an HIA.
Taking out a player in the air isn't always going to cause an injury but there's a much higher chance of it than if they're on the ground.
Just ban competing for the ball in the air if your team kicked it. Fuck off all the box kicks and you'd have not only a safer, but a better game.
ABs don't compete 95% of the time and they still box kick the ball, so I dunno if that is going to make much of s difference
Big part of the reason we haven't been that successful in the last few years is because we've been doing it despite being shit at it, and never bothered improving.
If you have less chance of getting possession back, then people will do it less - the other teams at least will look at the percentages. -
After watching last night’s Euro rugby and this morning’s NPC and AB Test can someone please explain the following
If a defender places his hands on the ground beyond the tackled player and/or the ball it’s a penalty against the defender for not supporting his own body weight
But when a supporting player for the attacking team ends up lying on the floor well beyond the ball either creating a ‘wall’ and / or taking a defender out of play it’s play on
That’s the first thing I’d officiate properly before introducing even more laws
-
@MiketheSnow bingo. How about making sure current officiating is up to scratch and consistent before bringing in more confusion.
-
@MiketheSnow said in World Rugby confirms changes to be implemented across the global game:
After watching last night’s Euro rugby and this morning’s NPC and AB Test can someone please explain the following
If a defender places his hands on the ground beyond the tackled player and/or the ball it’s a penalty against the defender for not supporting his own body weight
But when a supporting player for the attacking team ends up lying on the floor well beyond the ball either creating a ‘wall’ and / or taking a defender out of play it’s play on
That’s the first thing I’d officiate properly before introducing even more laws
You are talking about applying the laws fairly and equally between the attacking and defending teams and for that you have gone too far and deserve a card yourself.
-
Watched Detroit lions v packers the other day
A player got ejectedFew interesting things about how they deal with ejections in the NFL
Branch the Lions Defensive Back led with his helmet
First contact was helmet on helmet
Using the helmet as a weapon aint so tough in my book
When Chabal broke Ali Williams’ jaw into pieces in a similar play (no helmets there), now that was tough!I thought it was an ejection straight up
It was a late hit, the other player didn’t even have the ball! (he’d fumbled it)
Initially it was just a 15 yard penalty!
Then it got interesting, the TMO came straight over the top of the referee
TMO ordered the ejection, no discussion with the referee, all took less than a minuteAll the “old schools” were shocked; they all agreed it was a dirty hit, but ejection!
Branch then fingered the crowd as he went off (they didn’t show that bit, but you could hear it)
That was another 15 yard penaltySo the game day penalty for the team was 30 yards and the loss of their No. 1 DB for the rest of the game
As for the player; on Monday he got his fines; 10k+ for the hit and 10k+ for the finger
And he would have been notified of how many games suspension he’ll get if there is a repeatThat’s where it gets serious for the player, when you get suspended in the NFL you lose all your money for those games
He’s a high rated player, so you’re talking in 100s of thousands
And if keeps going “old school” he’ll then be suspended indefinitely and put on the NFL commissioners listI’d be surprised to see him do it again, no matter how pissed he is—just cost too much money
-
Lots of complaints this Autumn about YC for rugby 'incidents' where there's clumsy, head contact.
Ruining the game, ruining the spectacle.
I'd argue that YCing a player after a dominant scrum has been awarded a penalty try ruins the game far more.
Defending team is down to 14 and the whole match gets blown out in less than 10 mins.
Exactly what happened when Scotland were 12-0 ahead and Portugal after weathering the early storm were called back for a knock on when a certain intercept try was on.
Portugal getting pumped in the scrum and concede Penalty Try and YC.
10 mins later it's 33-0
-
@MiketheSnow are we at the point where kicking penalties just doesn't give enough points to the opposition to act as a deterrent? I do agree with you, but you need a way to deal with negative repeat infringements preventing tries. Traditionally that's simply the points you get by kicking penalties.
We are at the point where playing for a card is good tactics, and that's a bit shit. -
@reprobate although some of those scrum ones are not due to cynical play, just a lesser player/pack, in which case it is highly likely you are already gonna lose.
-
@taniwharugby said in World Rugby confirms changes to be implemented across the global game:
@reprobate although some of those scrum ones are not due to cynical play, just a lesser player/pack, in which case it is highly likely you are already gonna lose.
Like all this stuff it is a bit of a balancing act - you don't want to have teams playing with 14 men and then 13 simply because they aren't good enough at scrummaging - conversely you don't want to under-penalise it and allow the tactic of a team playing a front row that can't scrum but are effectively 3 x extra loose forwards. Fatties are important, and if I want to watch league I'll do that (I don't).
The key may well be just the value of a penalty kick - is 3 points every time enough? I think we're pretty close to saying no it's not - teams will turn down 3 points and scrum again and again playing for cards. Or looking for repeat infringements close to the line and then a card. I don't know the numbers, but I assume a YC on average is worth more than 3 points - and there is (subconscious or deliberate I'm not sure) a reset in the referee's mind when the team being offended against scores points.
Ireland were whistled off the park against us and we kicked our goals very accurately, but they were still within striking distance late in the game despite being well outplayed, and that scenario isn't unusual. If they had been given a YC for the repeat infringements, I don't think they would have been that close - but I'd much rather watch 15 on 15. It's all been said before, but the reason for that is purely because reffing is fucking hard, so the more major decisions there are in a game the more impact the ref has - which isn't what we want. The carding is so inconsistent that you end up with that inconsistency having a major impact on game results - see the RWC final for example. -
Points or card
Not both
