• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks EOYT

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
1.0k Posts 83 Posters 58.9k Views
All Blacks EOYT
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #367

    @nzzp said in All Blacks EOYT:

    @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks EOYT:

    I remember thinking at the time that Justin marshall hung around longer than he should have, was playing past him prime….but can’t think of too many people since…until the last few years

    Robin Brooke had a last tour up north in the late 90s and was well off the pace. Sad to see; felt a bit of a farewell pick at the time.

    Exceptional player though

    fair, we're still talking a long time since we've seen it

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    replied to frugby on last edited by
    #368

    @frugby said in All Blacks EOYT:

    @brodean said in All Blacks EOYT:

    Social media etiquette should not be a criteria for AB selection.

    I don't think anyone said it should be. But think about it like this:

    If you were a coach, and a player refused to answer a phone call explaining his non-selection, and went on to make a cryptic social media post moaning about it, would you be more or less likely to be inclined to select him in the future?

    Firstly, did that happen?
    Secondly, I'd remain neutral because it's my job and I'm a professional - I'm not going to have a sulk because someone else does - and particularly a young man with every right to be very fucking disappointed.

    F DuluthD 2 Replies Last reply
    4
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    replied to reprobate on last edited by
    #369

    @reprobate said in All Blacks EOYT:

    @frugby said in All Blacks EOYT:

    @brodean said in All Blacks EOYT:

    Social media etiquette should not be a criteria for AB selection.

    I don't think anyone said it should be. But think about it like this:

    If you were a coach, and a player refused to answer a phone call explaining his non-selection, and went on to make a cryptic social media post moaning about it, would you be more or less likely to be inclined to select him in the future?

    Firstly, did that happen?

    Yes - the social media post was public, and Foster literally spoke about the phone call thing.

    Secondly, I'd remain neutral because it's my job and I'm a professional - I'm not going to have a sulk because someone else does - and particularly a young man with every right to be very fucking disappointed.

    Fair enough if that's your view. Personally though, there is a degree of respect. I find it a pretty entitled way to act (particularly the phone call) for a guy who had less than 15 ABs caps to his name.

    B 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to frugby on last edited by
    #370

    @frugby said in All Blacks EOYT:

    @brodean said in All Blacks EOYT:

    Social media etiquette should not be a criteria for AB selection.

    I don't think anyone said it should be. But think about it like this:

    If you were a coach, and a player refused to answer a phone call explaining his non-selection, and went on to make a cryptic social media post moaning about it, would you be more or less likely to be inclined to select him in the future?

    One thing we seem to have learned is that Ryan/Razor seem to hold grudges.

    To answer your question - if I thought someone could add to my team's perforamnce, I would do what it took to get them engaged. Writing people off is what bad managers do. Getting the best out of different people and personality types is a strength I expected Razor to have (in particular). Arguably Hansen had it. Henry definitely had it.

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to reprobate on last edited by
    #371

    @reprobate said in All Blacks EOYT:

    Firstly, did that happen?

    Foster made a comment that he was disappointed Sotutu didn't answer the phone. The media ran with the story that Foster was pissed with Sotutu. Foster clarified to some in the media (Parsons in particular) that players miss calls all the time and it wasn't an issue.. he was disappointed he missed the chance to explain the situation to Hoskins before it was in the media

    F A 2 Replies Last reply
    7
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #372

    @Duluth said in All Blacks EOYT:

    @reprobate said in All Blacks EOYT:

    Firstly, did that happen?

    Foster made a comment that he was disappointed Sotutu didn't answer the phone. The media ran with the story that Foster was pissed with Sotutu. Foster clarified to some in the media (Parsons in particular) that players miss calls all the time and it wasn't an issue.. he was disappointed he missed the chance to explain the situation to Hoskins before it was in the media

    He never returned the call though - this has been widely reported.

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to frugby on last edited by
    #373

    @frugby

    Foster made the clarification

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    brodean
    replied to frugby on last edited by
    #374

    @frugby

    I agree with reprobate.

    My job as an AB coach is to get the best out of the best players.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    wrote on last edited by
    #375

    So it didn't really happen, and it was a different coach? Seems a bit of a long bow that anybody reasonable would be holding a grudge over that.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    brodean
    wrote on last edited by brodean
    #376

    If the coaches were guiding the team to 80% wins against the top teams I'd be less inclined to criticise but they ain't.

    Social media etiquette and body language shouldn't be a priority when you're not winning the tough ones.

    It's all nothing compared to stalking a woman and her boyfriend then smashing her teeth out.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #377

    @nzzp said in All Blacks EOYT:

    @frugby said in All Blacks EOYT:

    @brodean said in All Blacks EOYT:

    Social media etiquette should not be a criteria for AB selection.

    I don't think anyone said it should be. But think about it like this:

    If you were a coach, and a player refused to answer a phone call explaining his non-selection, and went on to make a cryptic social media post moaning about it, would you be more or less likely to be inclined to select him in the future?

    One thing we seem to have learned is that Ryan/Razor seem to hold grudges.

    To answer your question - if I thought someone could add to my team's perforamnce, I would do what it took to get them engaged. Writing people off is what bad managers do. Getting the best out of different people and personality types is a strength I expected Razor to have (in particular). Arguably Hansen had it. Henry definitely had it.

    I don't think I disagree with any of that, but I think the bold text probably explains it. I don't think they see Sotutu as being better than Savea at 8, so therefore felt he was out of their plans.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    African Monkey
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #378

    @Duluth said in All Blacks EOYT:

    @reprobate said in All Blacks EOYT:

    Firstly, did that happen?

    Foster made a comment that he was disappointed Sotutu didn't answer the phone. The media ran with the story that Foster was pissed with Sotutu. Foster clarified to some in the media (Parsons in particular) that players miss calls all the time and it wasn't an issue.. he was disappointed he missed the chance to explain the situation to Hoskins before it was in the media

    The fake version sounds better.

    Remember, don't let the truth get in the way of a good story.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #379

    For right or for wrong, they view Sotutu as a bit of a sulker- a flat track bully.

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/350320974/hoskins-sotutu-omission-all-blacks-coach-scott-robertsons-toughest-call

    During the selection process, Robertson sat down with players and pored over match footage, while ahead of the squad naming, assistant coach Jason Ryan made it clear the selectors would be analysing players’ body language when the going got tough.

    “We believe Wallace is an incredible young talent, the harder the game, the higher he rose in regards to his performance,” Robertson said.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to frugby on last edited by
    #380

    @frugby said in All Blacks EOYT:

    @nzzp said in All Blacks EOYT:

    @frugby said in All Blacks EOYT:

    @brodean said in All Blacks EOYT:

    Social media etiquette should not be a criteria for AB selection.

    I don't think anyone said it should be. But think about it like this:

    If you were a coach, and a player refused to answer a phone call explaining his non-selection, and went on to make a cryptic social media post moaning about it, would you be more or less likely to be inclined to select him in the future?

    One thing we seem to have learned is that Ryan/Razor seem to hold grudges.

    To answer your question - if I thought someone could add to my team's perforamnce, I would do what it took to get them engaged. Writing people off is what bad managers do. Getting the best out of different people and personality types is a strength I expected Razor to have (in particular). Arguably Hansen had it. Henry definitely had it.

    I don't think I disagree with any of that, but I think the bold text probably explains it. I don't think they see Sotutu as being better than Savea at 8, so therefore felt he was out of their plans.

    That's a fundamental shifting of the goalposts though. You argued above that it was attitude and sulking that was the issue - that is not the same as 'not good enough'

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #381

    Sevu Reece and Shannon Frizell have both beaten up women, but it is Akira Ioane and Hoskins Sotutu who always have their names dragged through the mud as if they are bad eggs so don't deserve selection. People have lost their fucking minds.

    dogmeatD gt12G 2 Replies Last reply
    10
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #382

    @nzzp said in All Blacks EOYT:

    @frugby said in All Blacks EOYT:

    @nzzp said in All Blacks EOYT:

    @frugby said in All Blacks EOYT:

    @brodean said in All Blacks EOYT:

    Social media etiquette should not be a criteria for AB selection.

    I don't think anyone said it should be. But think about it like this:

    If you were a coach, and a player refused to answer a phone call explaining his non-selection, and went on to make a cryptic social media post moaning about it, would you be more or less likely to be inclined to select him in the future?

    One thing we seem to have learned is that Ryan/Razor seem to hold grudges.

    To answer your question - if I thought someone could add to my team's perforamnce, I would do what it took to get them engaged. Writing people off is what bad managers do. Getting the best out of different people and personality types is a strength I expected Razor to have (in particular). Arguably Hansen had it. Henry definitely had it.

    I don't think I disagree with any of that, but I think the bold text probably explains it. I don't think they see Sotutu as being better than Savea at 8, so therefore felt he was out of their plans.

    That's a fundamental shifting of the goalposts though. You argued above that it was attitude and sulking that was the issue - that is not the same as 'not good enough'

    I think as I have tagged above though, they view his attitude and sulking as part of the problem.

    No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    replied to frugby on last edited by
    #383

    @frugby said in All Blacks EOYT:

    @nzzp said in All Blacks EOYT:

    @frugby said in All Blacks EOYT:

    @nzzp said in All Blacks EOYT:

    @frugby said in All Blacks EOYT:

    @brodean said in All Blacks EOYT:

    Social media etiquette should not be a criteria for AB selection.

    I don't think anyone said it should be. But think about it like this:

    If you were a coach, and a player refused to answer a phone call explaining his non-selection, and went on to make a cryptic social media post moaning about it, would you be more or less likely to be inclined to select him in the future?

    One thing we seem to have learned is that Ryan/Razor seem to hold grudges.

    To answer your question - if I thought someone could add to my team's perforamnce, I would do what it took to get them engaged. Writing people off is what bad managers do. Getting the best out of different people and personality types is a strength I expected Razor to have (in particular). Arguably Hansen had it. Henry definitely had it.

    I don't think I disagree with any of that, but I think the bold text probably explains it. I don't think they see Sotutu as being better than Savea at 8, so therefore felt he was out of their plans.

    That's a fundamental shifting of the goalposts though. You argued above that it was attitude and sulking that was the issue - that is not the same as 'not good enough'

    I think as I have tagged above though, they view his attitude and sulking as part of the problem.

    How do you think they view beating up women? That's A OK?

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #384

    @No-Quarter said in All Blacks EOYT:

    @frugby said in All Blacks EOYT:

    @nzzp said in All Blacks EOYT:

    @frugby said in All Blacks EOYT:

    @nzzp said in All Blacks EOYT:

    @frugby said in All Blacks EOYT:

    @brodean said in All Blacks EOYT:

    Social media etiquette should not be a criteria for AB selection.

    I don't think anyone said it should be. But think about it like this:

    If you were a coach, and a player refused to answer a phone call explaining his non-selection, and went on to make a cryptic social media post moaning about it, would you be more or less likely to be inclined to select him in the future?

    One thing we seem to have learned is that Ryan/Razor seem to hold grudges.

    To answer your question - if I thought someone could add to my team's perforamnce, I would do what it took to get them engaged. Writing people off is what bad managers do. Getting the best out of different people and personality types is a strength I expected Razor to have (in particular). Arguably Hansen had it. Henry definitely had it.

    I don't think I disagree with any of that, but I think the bold text probably explains it. I don't think they see Sotutu as being better than Savea at 8, so therefore felt he was out of their plans.

    That's a fundamental shifting of the goalposts though. You argued above that it was attitude and sulking that was the issue - that is not the same as 'not good enough'

    I think as I have tagged above though, they view his attitude and sulking as part of the problem.

    How do you think they view beating up women? That's A OK?

    Probably the same way as you or I would view it - grub behaviour.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #385

    @No-Quarter and I would have preferred neither of them ever got near an AB jersey as a result. Not like they were ever outstanding but even if they were.....

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by gt12
    #386

    @No-Quarter said in All Blacks EOYT:

    Sevu Reece and Shannon Frizell have both beaten up women, but it is Akira Ioane and Hoskins Sotutu who always have their names dragged through the mud as if they are bad eggs so don't deserve selection. People have lost their fucking minds.

    They have good body language on the field though.

    #betterstancesmakebetterallblacks

    1 Reply Last reply
    4

All Blacks EOYT
Sports Talk
allblacks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.