Chiefs vs Highlanders
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Toddy" data-cid="577683" data-time="1462609300">
<div>
<p>Couple of weeks on the sideline for Ngatai?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>given the ref/ARses were considering Red...youd have to think so!! :idiot2: :ireful:</p> -
<p>It's the climate rugby exists in currently. It just had to be a card</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Not saying right or wrong, just the environment the fish heads have created</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The justification and conversations about landing is more concerning than the debate about flipping people whether intentional or not</p> -
Absolutely pathetic that isn't a red card. The reasoning behind it staying at yellow was The fact Dixon landed on his side. When should the luck of the victim impact on the punishment. Needed to be red.
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Gunner" data-cid="577680" data-time="1462609229">
<div>
<p>If this is a card, its a fucking joke.<br><br>
Ngatai was committed to the tackle (head down) before Dixon jumped into the tackle.<br><br>
Not his fault IMO</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>But that's the rationale when jumping with eyes only the ball - and that leads to reds</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Not saying it's the right precedent but it's a reality</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="SouthernMan" data-cid="577689" data-time="1462609430">
<div>
<p>Absolutely pathetic that isn't a red card.<strong> The reasoning behind it staying at yellow was The fact Dixon landed on his side.</strong> When should the luck of the victim impact on the punishment. Needed to be red.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>they used that reasoning for the red card on Le Roux...the fact he landed on his head.</p> -
<p>Hmmm this debate is typical of rugby forums</p>
<p> </p>
<p>1) Chiefs supporter: fckn ref, not even a penalty</p>
<p>2) Clan supporter: definite red, looking at a couple of weeks on the sidelines</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Take the patches off people...and this is coming from a Crusaders man :p</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Siam" data-cid="577692" data-time="1462609514">
<div>
<p>But that's the rationale when jumping with eyes only the ball - and that leads to reds</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Not saying it's the right precedent but it's a reality</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Ngatai didnt jump, he was committed to tackle, Dixon jumped.</p> -
With a jumping player it is the defenders responsibility to wait until they land safely.
-
Good call as a non red card I thought.<br><br>
A few other thoughts<br><br>
Naholo looks brilliant for first game back - some good runs, great kick chasing and a turnover also.<br><br>
Highlanders are reading the Chiefs attack. Chiefs need to mix it up - too much one dimensional wide passing from Weber.<br><br>
Highlanders halves out playing Chiefs. -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="577693" data-time="1462609535">
<div>
<p>they used that reasoning for the red card on Le Roux...the fact he landed on his head.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Exactly, and they also used it for the Kings' player to only give him yellow (player landed on back, not neck/head).</p>