• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Springboks vs All Blacks I

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
springboksallblacks
1.6k Posts 85 Posters 50.1k Views
Springboks vs All Blacks I
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus Banned
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #66

    @sparky said in Springboks vs All Blacks I:

    @nostrildamus The series win in 1996, keeping the Boks to 0 at Newlands in 2008 and the last minute win at Soccer City in 2010 meant a lot me to be than reaching 50 unbeaten at Eden Park.

    fair enough!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus Banned
    replied to Smuts on last edited by
    #67

    @Smuts said in Springboks vs All Blacks I:

    That is some ugly reading. Ironic that Ian McIntosh got fired after recording our best result at Eden Park in the last 90 years

    I'd wager there's a lot more South African fans who'd attend a match at Eden Park today, might tip it back more in your favour..

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • W Offline
    W Offline
    W32
    replied to Frank on last edited by
    #68

    @Frank said in Springboks vs All Blacks I:

    The Boks have an aging team.
    They'd better hope the new guys are as good as what has come before.

    This is true, however the average age of the Bok starting 15 last saturday was 27. New Zealand average age of starting 15 a week ago was 28. (I can't find stats for saturdays AB game on the AB website)

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #69

    Pakman team, assuming EDG fit, but Paddy not:

    EDG/CT/TL/SB/TV/SC/SF/RD/TJS(!)/DMac/CC/JB/RI/WJ/BB

    Bench: TW/AA/FN/SD/DP/CR/ALB/MT

    BonesB ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Jet
    wrote on last edited by
    #70

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #71

    @pakman shit I just realised Ratima and Finau have the same initials as their future replacements.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Jet
    wrote on last edited by
    #72

    I have a bizarre feeling we are going to beat them twice.

    We are due some luck on the card front. Reckon 1 or 2 of their okes get "sent".

    Allbacks by 15+

    BonesB W 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Jet on last edited by
    #73

    @Jet said in Springboks vs All Blacks I:

    I have a bizarre feeling we are going to beat them twice.

    We are due some luck on the card front. Reckon 1 or 2 of their okes get "sent".

    Allbacks by 15+

    I just can't see us winning both. But I can definitely see them dropping their guard for one, most likely the second when they've already tied up the RC.

    kiwiinmelbK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #74

    First half will be massive. Aim being to burn off Bok starting fatties by halftime.

    Stand by for 'innovative' Rassie time wasting...

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    replied to Bones on last edited by kiwiinmelb
    #75

    @Bones said in Springboks vs All Blacks I:

    @Jet said in Springboks vs All Blacks I:

    I have a bizarre feeling we are going to beat them twice.

    We are due some luck on the card front. Reckon 1 or 2 of their okes get "sent".

    Allbacks by 15+

    I just can't see us winning both. But I can definitely see them dropping their guard for one, most likely the second when they've already tied up the RC.

    That’s my tip but would be happier with jet’s prediction

    kiwiinmelbK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    replied to kiwiinmelb on last edited by
    #76
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BerniesCornerB Offline
    BerniesCornerB Offline
    BerniesCorner
    wrote on last edited by
    #77

    If we do happen to have a good first half cant see the rationale to bring the subs on at a set time.
    Keep the starting lineup on as necessary and see how gets on.

    canefanC P 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • W Offline
    W Offline
    W32
    replied to Jet on last edited by
    #78

    @Jet said in Springboks vs All Blacks I:

    I have a bizarre feeling we are going to beat them twice.

    We are due some luck on the card front. Reckon 1 or 2 of their okes get "sent".

    Allbacks by 15+

    Is that you murray?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to BerniesCorner on last edited by
    #79

    @BerniesCorner I don't like predetermined subs either. Especially if affects our momentum like last Saturday

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to BerniesCorner on last edited by
    #80

    @BerniesCorner said in Springboks vs All Blacks I:

    If we do happen to have a good first half cant see the rationale to bring the subs on at a set time.
    Keep the starting lineup on as necessary and see how gets on.

    I meant the Boks changing out their fatties at 40. We ought to get more from ours.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    darylmitchell
    replied to Frank on last edited by darylmitchell
    #81

    @pakman said in Springboks vs All Blacks I:

    @BerniesCorner said in Springboks vs All Blacks I:

    If we do happen to have a good first half cant see the rationale to bring the subs on at a set time.
    Keep the starting lineup on as necessary and see how gets on.

    I meant the Boks changing out their fatties at 40. We ought to get more from ours.

    let's hope Taimati Williams starts again.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    ARHS
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #82

    @Bones said in Springboks vs All Blacks I:

    @pakman shit I just realised Ratima and Finau have the same initials as their future replacements.

    And I thought everyone was being replaced by 'AI' these days. Maybe the selectors are showing they are boomers and missed the trend at 6...

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #83

    @canefan said in Springboks vs All Blacks I:

    @BerniesCorner I don't like predetermined subs either. Especially if affects our momentum like last Saturday

    I don’t think last weekend was predetermined. In fact far from it. That was more a case of “we are up by plenty, clear the bench”.

    Doubt that will happen this weekend.

    The Boks have a clear strategy when it comes to subbing their front row forwards.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    wrote on last edited by
    #84

    image.png

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #85

    @pakman said in Springboks vs All Blacks I:

    Pakman team, assuming EDG fit, but Paddy not:

    EDG/CT/TL/SB/TV/SC/SF/RD/TJS(!)/DMac/CC/JB/RI/WJ/BB

    Bench: TW/AA/FN/SD/DP/CR/ALB/MT

    6/2 bench I reckon. Don’t need an outside back replacement for this test with Jordie and Ioane in the team.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Springboks vs All Blacks I
Rugby Matches
springboksallblacks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.