Canes vs Chiefs

[Rancid Schnitzel]

Faaaaaaaaarrkkkk

[Unco]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="No Quarter" data-cid="574367" data-time="1461403225">
<div>
<p>Guys Joubert clearly said you can't replace a player and cause golden oldies I.E. bullshit he's injured, you now have 14. That's my understanding.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Tokolahi was injured, wasn't he?</p>

[hurricane]

<p>Unreal!</p>

[Frank]

<p>Sam Cane probably called the "injury" - showing McCaw-like levels of cunning, but Richie would have known that technicality.</p>

[No Quarter]

Golden oldies and Woodward saves the Chiefs. That's a pretty frustrating finish!! Haha

[taniwharugby]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="No Quarter" data-cid="574367" data-time="1461403225">
<div>
<p>Guys Joubert clearly said you can't replace a player and cause golden oldies I.E. bullshit he's injured, you now have 14. That's my understanding.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Was someone on the sideline telling Joubert wasnt it...is it a new ruling or an obscure one not often called?</p>

[Stargazer]

<p>Apparently, this is the rule (as tweeted by Nigel Yalden):</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Law 3.5(k)</p>
<p> </p>
<p><img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cgt3jyTUoAAaxmS.jpg" alt="Cgt3jyTUoAAaxmS.jpg"></p>

[Billy Tell]

<p>Woodward :(</p>

[antipodean]

<p>If Beaudy's kicking didn't completely kill them, the brain farts by TJP did. I can't believe anyone in their right mind thinks he should be the second halfback option.</p>

[gt12]

Poor Woodward. Played well then dropped one ball and that's that. Muppet.

[Siam]

<p>Wow that game had everything !</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Great fun to watch all things considered</p>

[Talisker]

The ruling is to stop a team that is getting mullered in the tight going uncontested as a tactic.

[Billy Tell]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="antipodean" data-cid="574379" data-time="1461403364">
<div>
<p>If Beaudy's kicking didn't completely kill them, the brain farts by TJP did. I can't believe anyone in their right mind thinks he should be the second halfback option.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I think it should still be TKB.  He's less flashy than Weber or TJP, but he's reliable.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I will be interested to see who gets the 3rd spot: TJP or Weber.</p>

[Toddy]

<p>Good away win for the chiefs. When do they play the crusaders?</p>

[No Quarter]

That's our 2nd 1 point loss this season. Grrr.

[KiwiMurph]

Entertaining but weird game. Barrett was excellent goal kicking aside. Thought Cruden was bloody quiet and Julian Savea doesnt look like an AB.

[Dice]

<p>Another good game.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Just like at the end of the Highlanders game, Woodward shows that he's not clutch.</p>

[hurricane]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Billy Tell" data-cid="574383" data-time="1461403457">
<div>
<p>I think it should still be TKB.  He's less flashy than Weber or TJP, but he's reliable.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I will be interested to see who gets the 3rd spot: TJP or Weber.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>DWTA. Weber on a bad day, and today was a bad day, is better than TKB on <strong>current form</strong>.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>But close call granted as both didn't look the goods. My opinion only,</p>

[Talisker]

Really enjoyable game. <br>
I really like McKenzie, and Savea Jr is fulfilling the promise<br><br>
Dane Coles had a good game too

[hurricane]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Stargazer" data-cid="574377" data-time="1461403316">
<div>
<p>Apparently, this is the rule (as tweeted by Nigel Yalden):</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Law 3.5(k)</p>
<p> </p>
<p><img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cgt3jyTUoAAaxmS.jpg" alt="Cgt3jyTUoAAaxmS.jpg"></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>I am not sure where I stand on the rule. It wasn't the chiefs fault they had two blokes injured. Unless we are punishing them for not having more props on the bench who can play both sides.</p>