Canes vs Chiefs

[Frank]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="574356" data-time="1461402985">
<div>
<p>not really convenient when they are now down to 14</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Chiefs didn't realize that would happen.</p>

[Rancid Schnitzel]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="574350" data-time="1461402734"><p>
niggle yea I guess, stupid thugish behaviour, which is what I saw that as.....<br><br>
Chiefs hanging in there</p></blockquote>
<br>
I was referring to niggle not thuggish behaviour.

[taniwharugby]

<p>oh dear, TJ made an absolute meal of that</p>

[hurricane]

<p>45 seconds left</p>

[No Quarter]

Guys Joubert clearly said you can't replace a player and cause golden oldies I.E. bullshit he's injured, you now have 14. That's my understanding.

[No Quarter]

Woodward drops the fucking game, fuck me.

[Higgins]

<p>Woodward you plonker.</p>

[taniwharugby]

<p>Woodwards hands lose it (not a great pass, but still)</p>

[Rancid Schnitzel]

Faaaaaaaaarrkkkk

[Unco]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="No Quarter" data-cid="574367" data-time="1461403225">
<div>
<p>Guys Joubert clearly said you can't replace a player and cause golden oldies I.E. bullshit he's injured, you now have 14. That's my understanding.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Tokolahi was injured, wasn't he?</p>

[hurricane]

<p>Unreal!</p>

[Frank]

<p>Sam Cane probably called the "injury" - showing McCaw-like levels of cunning, but Richie would have known that technicality.</p>

[No Quarter]

Golden oldies and Woodward saves the Chiefs. That's a pretty frustrating finish!! Haha

[taniwharugby]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="No Quarter" data-cid="574367" data-time="1461403225">
<div>
<p>Guys Joubert clearly said you can't replace a player and cause golden oldies I.E. bullshit he's injured, you now have 14. That's my understanding.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Was someone on the sideline telling Joubert wasnt it...is it a new ruling or an obscure one not often called?</p>

[Stargazer]

<p>Apparently, this is the rule (as tweeted by Nigel Yalden):</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Law 3.5(k)</p>
<p> </p>
<p><img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cgt3jyTUoAAaxmS.jpg" alt="Cgt3jyTUoAAaxmS.jpg"></p>

[Billy Tell]

<p>Woodward :(</p>

[antipodean]

<p>If Beaudy's kicking didn't completely kill them, the brain farts by TJP did. I can't believe anyone in their right mind thinks he should be the second halfback option.</p>

[gt12]

Poor Woodward. Played well then dropped one ball and that's that. Muppet.

[Siam]

<p>Wow that game had everything !</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Great fun to watch all things considered</p>

[Talisker]

The ruling is to stop a team that is getting mullered in the tight going uncontested as a tactic.