RWC Week 2: All Blacks v Namibia
-
@MiketheSnow said in RWC Week 2: All Blacks v Namibia:
Did any of you guys watch the Italy v Namibia match?
They beat them 52-8
You’re all flapping your gums like you’re about to play Ireland or SA in the QF ffs
Regardless of who was picked in whatever position this match is going to tell you 4/5 of fuck all beyond are players match fit
Yep 100% it is Namibia,If we have people wanking on about players who play well in this match that they should be in the top XV to play the QF,Well we are in a desperate state and we probably are thanks to Foster.
It does not mean a thing if players can play to a pattern etc its Namibia and you will not be able to replicate in the QF.
-
@stodders said in RWC Week 2: All Blacks v Namibia:
@MiketheSnow not about the opposition quality. More about whether the players can play to the pattern and execute consistently. You know, like Ireland did against Romania to blow the cobwebs out
It still will not tell us anything, we are playing Namibia it means nothing as how can you compare that to what you can achieve against the big boys in the QF, you will not get away with shit you do in this game in that QF.
-
how come everyone needs rest except BB and savea, is it literally because fozzie has no one else he trusts in those posititions?
-
@Kiwiwomble said in RWC Week 2: All Blacks v Namibia:
how come everyone needs rest except BB and savea, is it literally because fozzie has no one else he trusts in those posititions?
Not sure on Savea,But maybe by giving BB the game against Namibia and he shines it justifies his selection going forward, well in Fosters eyes anyway.
That could be a dangerous selection game to play. -
@Chris i just find it so weird, almost every other position players get rotated through, often too much so they cant really settle...except these two who play so much theyre stinting the depth in those positions...
-
-
@Kiwiwomble you can't see the logic because there isn't any logic to see mate.
-
@Kiwiwomble but Savea no rest, despite probably close to the most minutes of anyone in a very attritional position?
-
I wonder if BB at 15 and DMac at 10 is a sign that Fozzie is now thinking that DMac might come onto his bench?
Nobody wants to see BB at 10 if RM gets injured, so maybe this is about giving DMac some more time to get up to speed there. BB then keeps his spot to just provide some consistency in the side, some experience at the back, and maybe a continuation of the dual playmaker stuff. Stuff that would be missing if we also gave WJ a run at 15
Lord knows, our bench could use a bit of something
Jeez, that midfield though - it wouldn't scare most club sides
-
@voodoo nobody wants to see Beauden at 15 either.
-
@Canes4life said in RWC Week 2: All Blacks v Namibia:
@voodoo nobody wants to see Beauden at 15 either.
Ha - but in all seriousness, I think he is absolutely bolted-on in Fozzie's mind, so it's about finding the pieces to fit around him. I'd say that 9, 10, 12, 13 and 15 are absolutely locked in. Just the wingers and bench to finalise, with WJ pretty much a certainty still I think with one of Clarke, LF and Telea at 11
-
Unfortunately, I think you're right, even though Beauden showed his clear limitations against France on Saturday.
-
@Kiwiwomble said in RWC Week 2: All Blacks v Namibia:
@Chris i just find it so weird, almost every other position players get rotated through, often too much so they cant really settle...except these two who play so much theyre stinting the depth in those positions...
Do they see BB as fathering DMac at 10?
Is Jordan injured? Was this not the game to see how well he does at 15 and give BB a rest? -
@nostrildamus maybe....i mean Dmac has over a hundred super games and 41 tests....you'd hope he wouldn't need too much baby sitting
-
@Canes4life dunno, I think BB showed on the weekend he is still capable of doing what needs to be done, but for whatever reason, isnt doing these consistently, but it also doesnt look like these are poor execution of an action, more a deliberate action, meaning he is either opting for this or it is part of the gameplan.
-
@voodoo said in RWC Week 2: All Blacks v Namibia:
@Canes4life said in RWC Week 2: All Blacks v Namibia:
@voodoo nobody wants to see Beauden at 15 either.
Ha - but in all seriousness, I think he is absolutely bolted-on in Fozzie's mind, so it's about finding the pieces to fit around him. I'd say that 9, 10, 12, 13 and 15 are absolutely locked in. Just the wingers and bench to finalise, with WJ pretty much a certainty still I think with one of Clarke, LF and Telea at 11
You seriously reckon the first two have a chance of ousting Telea ?
They could rack up ten tries between them this weekend and still have Bob Hope and No hope of getting that 11 jersey for the big games.
-
@Kiwiwomble said in RWC Week 2: All Blacks v Namibia:
@nostrildamus maybe....i mean Dmac has over a hundred super games and 41 tests....you'd hope he wouldn't need too much baby sitting
he sure as shit doesn't need baby-sitting against Namibia.
Test rugby at 10 is a step up, so if you want to use him there you need to give him a go there and build confidence and combinations - not what I suspect is Foster's plan to drop him into the last 10 mins of a must win QF, asking him to save the day against either SA who just humped us, or Ireland who beat us in a home series.
The preparation needs to be as part of the A team, not with the B team. he's been given one go with the A team, against Argentina, and he looked nervous as to be honest - goalkicking went to shit - but it was still the best our backline unit has looked since Foster took over. It's actually one of the most exciting things about next year I reckon.
