SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil)
-
@mariner4life said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
And Leon is getting an AB gig?
I'm assuming Robertson - who knows what he wants - had a hand in selecting him?
-
Blues need their leaders to step up. Headless chicken stuff ATM
-
@chimoaus said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
@KiwiMurph I would rather watch Leon Blues then Leon ABs 😉
He can be water boy
-
@Victor-Meldrew Yep to make sure he never does what Leon suggests. To be fair we are being tough on him, the players skills have well and truly been poor so far.
-
@Victor-Meldrew said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Blues need their leaders to step up. Headless chicken stuff ATM
They don't have leaders. That's the problem
-
Blues just being bullied
-
"Mo'unga aggressive defender" - what drugs are these commentators on. They're getting awfully carried away now.
-
@antipodean said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
"Mo'unga aggressive defender" - what drugs are these commentators on. They're getting awfully carried away now.
Crusaders player says
-
@antipodean said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
"Mo'unga aggressive defender" - what drugs are these commentators on
Clearly not Mogadon.
-
@Victor-Meldrew said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
@mariner4life said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
And Leon is getting an AB gig?
I'm assuming Robertson - who knows what he wants - had a hand in selecting him?
Maybe he just likes yes men around - because Rangi and Holland don't look like guys who'll add much to what Razor can do.
-
@Winger said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
RM easily the better first so far
Not fucking hard, TBF.
-
No Blues to make thr AB 23. Not one. Pea hearted. No brains. No big match temperament.
They are 2nd to everything
-
Why is the Blues pattern of play to use the least imposing tight forwards to carry the ball up? Nepo and Ricci are useless at it. A three legged donkey would be more effective.
-
Ricatelli does a great impression of a beach ball...
