Black Caps v England
-
@Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:
@KiwiMurph said in Black Caps v England:
@Chris said in Black Caps v England:
@KiwiMurph said in Black Caps v England:
@Chris said in Black Caps v England:
@Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:
Tom Not Pakistan, Sri Lanka, West Indies, or Bangladesh Test Sides Latham.
So... banking on Henry Nicholls.
Or England as Tom has a test century against them as well.
One swallow doesn't make a summer
One more than you have against England Mate.
The lowest of bars
I would back myself for a well compiled 0 (1).
Well by the looks you don’t need any sort of defensive technique to play Cricket for the Black Caps anymore, So everyone is up for selection I reckon I could knick one threw slips and jag a boundary.
-
-
@Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:
@KiwiMurph said in Black Caps v England:
So Matt Henry to come in for test 2 presumably.
Any other changes? Young?
Has to be Young or Philipps for Nicholls. Also Henry and Bracewell
Young will score not much he is vulnerable to knick off as he loses his off stump, Poms will love him.
-
@Damo said in Black Caps v England:
So long as these two bat out the rest of the evening session and then through to tea tomorrow we are a shout.
They've already amassed an 11 run partnership, England will be worried
-
@No-Quarter said in Black Caps v England:
@Damo said in Black Caps v England:
So long as these two bat out the rest of the evening session and then through to tea tomorrow we are a shout.
They've already amassed an 11 run partnership, England will be worried
Both are well capable of big hundreds under pressure.
The key will be getting through tomorrow's night session with wickets in hand.
-
@Damo said in Black Caps v England:
@No-Quarter said in Black Caps v England:
@Damo said in Black Caps v England:
So long as these two bat out the rest of the evening session and then through to tea tomorrow we are a shout.
They've already amassed an 11 run partnership, England will be worried
Both are well capable of big hundreds under pressure.
The key will be getting through tomorrow's night session with wickets in hand.
Not sure They both are capable of a big innings under pressure in a test match,
Mitchell yes we have seen it Bracewell hasn’t so is he capable. -
@Chris said in Black Caps v England:
@Damo said in Black Caps v England:
@No-Quarter said in Black Caps v England:
@Damo said in Black Caps v England:
So long as these two bat out the rest of the evening session and then through to tea tomorrow we are a shout.
They've already amassed an 11 run partnership, England will be worried
Both are well capable of big hundreds under pressure.
The key will be getting through tomorrow's night session with wickets in hand.
Not sure They both are capable of a big innings under pressure in a test match,
Mitchell yes we have seen it Bracewell hasn’t so is he capable.Bracewell nearly single handedly beat India in ODI a couple of weeks ago from a similar situation.
-
@Damo said in Black Caps v England:
@Chris said in Black Caps v England:
@Damo said in Black Caps v England:
@No-Quarter said in Black Caps v England:
@Damo said in Black Caps v England:
So long as these two bat out the rest of the evening session and then through to tea tomorrow we are a shout.
They've already amassed an 11 run partnership, England will be worried
Both are well capable of big hundreds under pressure.
The key will be getting through tomorrow's night session with wickets in hand.
Not sure They both are capable of a big innings under pressure in a test match,
Mitchell yes we have seen it Bracewell hasn’t so is he capable.Bracewell nearly single handedly beat India in ODI a couple of weeks ago from a similar situation.
That was a ODI innings a lot different to a test match.
As for tests 74 not out one good innings and 7 failures doesn't tell me he is capable of 150 which is a big score under pressure.I hope he does but a I out of 8 test innings in Test Cricket doesn't prove he can. -
-
@Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:
That unbeaten partnership at the end clearly has England on the ropes. I'll be back there tomorrow with great expectations. The scoreboard had us well ahead of the required run rate too.
Only need 2 an over if we bat deep into the 5th day too easy.
-
@Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:
That unbeaten partnership at the end clearly has England on the ropes. I'll be back there tomorrow with great expectations. The scoreboard had us well ahead of the required run rate too.
Yes. We’re up against it alright, but this England team never gives up. Don’t count your chickens just yet.
-
@Chris said in Black Caps v England:
@Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:
@KiwiMurph said in Black Caps v England:
@Chris said in Black Caps v England:
@KiwiMurph said in Black Caps v England:
@Chris said in Black Caps v England:
@Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:
Tom Not Pakistan, Sri Lanka, West Indies, or Bangladesh Test Sides Latham.
So... banking on Henry Nicholls.
Or England as Tom has a test century against them as well.
One swallow doesn't make a summer
One more than you have against England Mate.
The lowest of bars
I would back myself for a well compiled 0 (1).
Well by the looks you don’t need any sort of defensive technique to play Cricket for the Black Caps anymore, So everyone is up for selection I reckon I could knick one threw slips and jag a boundary.
We aren't the black caps anymore. Black craps
-
Broad was very impressive. Amazing crowd for first two sessions and very entertaining by England.
Thought both Tickner and Kuggeleijn bowled OK. But Wagner ran up quickest hundred I have ever seen from a test bowler.
Good luck to Daryl and Bracewell tomorrow. I won't bother heading back though. -
@Chris said in Black Caps v England:
Attitude in the way we play negative and tentative need to be bolder and positive.
The difference between the two teams is a reflection of the personality of the respective coaches. Stead just comes across as conservative and boring.
-
@Bovidae said in Black Caps v England:
@Chris said in Black Caps v England:
Attitude in the way we play negative and tentative need to be bolder and positive.
The difference between the two teams is a reflection of the personality of the respective coaches. Stead just comes across as conservative and boring.
For all the grief the NZRU gets about its coaching appointments, NZC seems to be just as bad with retaining untouchable coaches. Gary Stead and High Performance Bob Carter appear to have guaranteed jobs for life.
-
@Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:
@Bovidae said in Black Caps v England:
@Chris said in Black Caps v England:
Attitude in the way we play negative and tentative need to be bolder and positive.
The difference between the two teams is a reflection of the personality of the respective coaches. Stead just comes across as conservative and boring.
For all the grief the NZRU gets about its coaching appointments, NZC seems to be just as bad with retaining untouchable coaches. Gary Stead and High Performance Bob Carter appear to have guaranteed jobs for life.
Larsen is a selector as well. One who wouldn't pick Boult FFS.
-
@Bovidae said in Black Caps v England:
@Chris said in Black Caps v England:
Attitude in the way we play negative and tentative need to be bolder and positive.
The difference between the two teams is a reflection of the personality of the respective coaches. Stead just comes across as conservative and boring.
That will have a lot to do with it.
-
@Bovidae said in Black Caps v England:
@Chris said in Black Caps v England:
Attitude in the way we play negative and tentative need to be bolder and positive.
The difference between the two teams is a reflection of the personality of the respective coaches. Stead just comes across as conservative and boring.
It’s amazing the turnaround that has occurred in the England set up. For sure, Baz has generated a seismic shift in attitude in the England set up, but the really significant change was in the willingness to appoint a maverick like McCullum in the first place. We’ve nearly always favoured time-servers as coaches who bring that mantra in to selection and tactics.
Just the other day I was watching a recording of a Steve Waugh interview and his critique on England selection was as illuminating as it was unsurprising (can it be both?). Looking at the attack he said we rarely picked the likes of Devon Malcolm who had express pace and a poor radar, in favour of journeymen who could be guaranteed to put the ball “on the spot”. Trouble was, everyone knew where “the spot” was. His view on Malcolm was, “yeah he was erratic and at his pace, that scared the shit out of us”.
-
Thank god this is nearly over. Tough day at the office. We had our chances, but poor bowling let them off the hook.
For the second test, we need better bowlers. Henry definitely, I'd pick Boult as well but that won't happen. KJ needs to be looked after somehow, and stress fractures fixed.
Batting, who knows. Will Young I presume gets a crack - but it's going to be easier with just daylight to deal with. Day/night tests are great in theory, but I don't love them right now; too one sided at night.Well played England. You took your chances and made us look silly.
-
@ARHS said in Black Caps v England:
Broad was very impressive. Amazing crowd for first two sessions and very entertaining by England.
Thought both Tickner and Kuggeleijn bowled OK. But Wagner ran up quickest hundred I have ever seen from a test bowler.
Good luck to Daryl and Bracewell tomorrow. I won't bother heading back though.Whoever sets the ticket prices on this one may have slightly missed a trick. I was waiting to hear if it was reduced adult prices at 5 wickets down like the evening-only rate.
It isn't (other than the preplanned 'one kid free per adult ticket'), so we've done the wait-to-see-if-early-wickets-fall thing, and....
Might not have done much for net ticket revenue in the end, but perhaps more punters for the food and beer, and to show up on screen.
